Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:42:05.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of herbicides on growth and sclerotia production in Rhizoctonia solani

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

R. Harikrishnan  and
X. B. Yang
X. B. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011; xbyang@iastate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of three commonly applied soybean (Glycine max) herbicides (glyphosate, imazethapyr, and pendimethalin) on the mycelial growth, sclerotial production, and viability of Rhizoctonia solani isolates [anastomosis groups AG-1, AG-2-2, and AG-4] under controlled conditions. Pendimethalin significantly reduced mycelial growth of all three R. solani isolates investigated, whereas effects of the herbicides imazethapyr and glyphosate were not significant. Sclerotial production was affected differently by the three herbicides. Isolates AG-1 and AG-2-2 produced sclerotia both in vitro and in vivo, whereas isolate AG-4 did not produce sclerotia in vitro. In vitro AG-1 isolate showed a decrease, and AG-2-2 isolate showed an increase in sclerotial production in the presence of herbicide. In contrast, both AG-1 and AG-2-2 isolates showed reduction in sclerotial production in vivo compared to AG-4 isolate, which showed an increase in sclerotial production in the presence of herbicides. Sclerotial production was generally higher in vivo than in vitro. The number of sclerotia produced per unit sclerotial weight was often higher in the presence of herbicides. Viability of sclerotia produced in the presence of herbicides was not significantly different from the no-herbicide control.

Keywords

GlyphosateimazethapyrpendimethalinRhizoctonia solani Kuhn [teleomorph Thanatephorus cucumeris (A.B. Frank) Donk] AG-1, AG-2-2, and AG-4soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrRoot rot
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 241 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Altman, J. 1969. Pre-disposition of sugarbeets to Rhizoctonia solani damping-off with herbicides. Phytopathology 59:1015.Google Scholar
Altman, J. and Campbell, C. L. 1973. Effect of herbicides on plant diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 15:361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, B. B., Griffin, J. L., Russin, J. S., and Snow, J. P. 1996. Herbicide effects on Rhizoctonia solani in vitro and Rhizoctonia foliar blight of soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carling, D. E. 1996. Grouping in Rhizoctonia solani by hyphal anastomosis reaction. Pages 37–47 In Sneh, B., Jabaji-Hare, S., Neate, S., and Dijst, G., eds. Rhizoctonia species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology, and Disease Control. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Chan, M.M.Y., Trimer, R. E., and Fong, B. 1991. Effect of antimicrotubule drug oryzalin on growth and differentiation of the parasitic protozoan Leishmania mexicana . Differentiation 46:15–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Doupnik, B. 1993. Soybean production and disease loss estimates for north central United States from 1989 to 1991. Plant Dis. 77:1170–1171.Google Scholar
Harikrishnan, R. and Yang, X. B. 1998. Effects of herbicide on mycelial growth, sclerotial production and viability of Rhizoctonia solani under in vitro conditions. Phytopathology 88:S36. [Abstract]Google Scholar
Hyde, G. J. and Hardham, A. R. 1993. Microtubules regulate the generation of polarity in zoospores of Phytophthora cinnamoni . Eur. J. Cell Biol. 62:75–85.Google Scholar
Jones, R. K. and Belmar, S. B. 1989. Characterization and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. isolated from rice, soybean, and other crops grown in rotation with rice in Texas. Plant Dis. 73:1004–1010.Google Scholar
Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1973. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Residue Rev. 45:145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawate, M. K., Kawate, S. C., Ogg, A. G. Jr, and Kraft, J. M. 1992. Response of Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi and Pythium ultimum to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 40:497–502.Google Scholar
Leach, S. S., Murdoch, C. W., and Gordon, G. 1991. Response of selected soilborne fungi and bacteria to herbicides utilized in potato crop management systems in Maine. Am. Potato J. 68:269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morejohn, L. C., Bureau, T. E., Mole-Bajer, J., Bajer, A. S., and Fosket, D. E. 1987. Oryzalin, a dinitroanaline herbicide binds to plant tubulin and inhibits microtubule polymerization in vitro. Planta 172:252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiki, T. and Ui, T. 1978. Ecological and morphological characteristics of sclerotia of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn produced in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10:471–478.Google Scholar
Nelson, B., Helm, T., Christianson, T., and Kural, I. 1996. Characterization and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia from soybean. Plant Dis. 80:74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, N. R., Rush, C. M., Horn, N. L., and Carver, R. B. 1977. Aerial blights of soybean caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 25:125–143.Google Scholar
Partyka, R. E. and Mai, W. F. 1958. Nematicides in relation to sclerotial germination in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum . Phytopathology 48:720–722.Google Scholar
Reichard, S. L., Sule, R. M., and Rhodes, L. H. 1997. Growth and reproduction of Sclerotinia trifoliorum as influenced by herbicides. Mycologia 89:82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriquez-Kabana, R., Curl, E. A., and Funderburk, H. H. 1966. Effects of four herbicides on growth of Rhizoctonia solani . Phytopathology 56:1332–1333.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. B. and Backman, P. A., eds. 1989. Compendium of Soybean Diseases. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
Sneh, B., Burpee, L., and Ogashi, A. 1991. Identification of Rhizoctonia Species. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. pp. 67–75.Google Scholar
Strachan, S. D. and Hess, F. D. 1983. The biochemical mechanism of action of the dinitroanaline herbicide oryzalin. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 20:141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachibana, H. 1968. Rhizoctonia solani root rot epidemics of soybeans in central Iowa. Plant Dis. Rep. 52:613–614 Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R., Harvey, R. G., and Hagedorn, D. J. 1979. Mechanism for the suppression of pea (Pisum sativum) root rot by dinitroanaline herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ui, T. 1966. Formation of sclerotia and mycelial strands in Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 32:203–209.Google Scholar
Verma, P. R. and McKenzie, D. L. 1985. In vitro effects of herbicides on mycelial growth of AG 2-1 and AG-4 Rhizoctonia solani isolates from canola/rapeseed. Phytopathology 75:1363.Google Scholar
Wacker, I., Quader, H., and Schnepf, E. 1987. Influence of herbicide oryzalin on cytoskeleton and growth of Funaria hygrometrica Pronemata. Protoplasma 142:55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, W. F. 1996. Influence of dintroanaline herbicides on growth, sporulation, and infectivity of four Phytophthora spp. pathogenic to deciduous fruit trees. Phytopathology 86:906–913.Google Scholar