Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:36:54.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Herbicides on the Growth and Yield of Muskmelons (Cucumis melo)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Carl E. Motsenbocker
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., Box 7609, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
A. Richard Bonanno
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., Box 7609, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695

Abstract

Three herbicide treatments were evaluated for use under clear polyethylene mulch and three types of row covers (spunbonded polyester, double-slitted polyethylene, and perforated polyethylene). Treatments included combinations of bensulide {O,O-bis(1-methylethyl)-S-[2-[(phenylsulfonyl)amino]ethyl]phosphorodithioate} and naptalam {2-[(1-naphthalenylamino)carbonyl]benzoic acid}, and cinmethylin {exo-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-2-[(2-methylphenyl)methoxy]-7-oxabicyclo [2.2.1] heptane} alone and in combination with naptalam. In 1985 and 1986, all herbicide treatments controlled more than 95% of carpetweed (Mollugo verticillata L. # MOLVE) and large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA], except for the combination of bensulide plus naptalam in 1986, which controlled only 73 to 85% of these weeds. In both years, all herbicide treatments reduced crop vigor at 3 weeks but not at 7 weeks after transplanting. Total yield was not different with any of the herbicide treatments in 1985 and 1986. However, in 1986, yields were greater from the bensulide plus naptalam treatment than for the weed-free control. Herbicide treatment did not affect early yields in 1985, but the bensulide plus naptalam treatment was greater than all others in 1986. The use of row covers did not increase herbicide-induced crop injury over that of clear mulch alone. Greenhouse studies indicated that soil-applied cinmethylin reduced muskmelon root and shoot weight. Foliar applications reduced muskmelon shoot weight.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashley, R. A. 1970. Weed control in transplanted cucumbers under clear plastic. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:328330.Google Scholar
2. Baron, J. J. and Gorske, S. F. 1981. Soil carbon dioxide levels: as affected by plastic mulches. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 16:149155.Google Scholar
3. Black, A. L. and Greb, B. W. 1962. Nitrate accumulation in soils covered with plastic mulch. Agron. J. 54:366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bonanno, A. R. and Lamont, W. J. 1987. The effect of polyethylene mulches, irrigation method, and row covers on soil and air temperatures and yield of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112:735738.Google Scholar
5. Buchholz, C. 1966. Weed control under clear plastic mulch. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 20:8188.Google Scholar
6. Clarkson, V. A. and Frazier, W. A. 1957. Effect of paper and polyethylene mulches and plastic caps on cantaloupe yields and earliness. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 69:400404.Google Scholar
7. Dickerson, C. T. and Sweet, R. D. 1968. Weed control for transplanted muskmelons grown under clear plastic mulch. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:225232.Google Scholar
8. Downes, J. 1966. Comparison of five mulch fumigation treatments on yields and quality of tomatoes and muskmelons. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 7:5355.Google Scholar
9. El-Deek, M. H. and Hess, F. D. 1986. Inhibited mitotic entry is the cause of growth inhibition by cinmethylin. Weed Sci. 34:684688.Google Scholar
10. Gorske, S. F. 1980. Weed control under clear plastic for muskmelons. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 15:104106.Google Scholar
11. Gorske, S. F. 1981. Chemical weed control programs for selected vegetables on clear plastic mulches. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 16:142–138.Google Scholar
12. Goss, J. R. and May, J. W. 1984. Performance of SD 95481 in herbicide combinations for broad spectrum weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 24:20.Google Scholar
13. Hopen, H. J. 1965. Effects of black and transparent polyethylene mulches on soil temperatures, sweet corn growth and maturity in a cool growing season. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 86:415420.Google Scholar
14. Long, J. H., May, J. W., and Goss, J. R. 1984. SD 95481 a new soil applied herbicide for use in broadleaved crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 24:261.Google Scholar
15. May, J. W. and Goss, J. R. 1984. SD 95481, a new soil applied herbicide for use in soybeans, cotton and peanuts. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 24:45.Google Scholar
16. Pollack, B. L., Smith, N. J., and Cialone, J. C. 1969. A summary of crop response to various agricultural film mulches. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 9:1725.Google Scholar
17. Schales, F. D. and Sheldrake, R. 1966. Mulch effects on soil conditions and muskmelon response. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 88:425430.Google Scholar
18. Sheldrake, R. 1963. Carbon dioxide levels in the microclimate as influenced by the permeability of mulches. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 4:9396.Google Scholar
19. Shell Dev. Co. 1985. Cinch Herbicide Technical Manual. Shell Chem. Co., Houston, TX. Page 5.Google Scholar
20. Smith, N. J. 1968. Evaluation of selective herbicides under clear polyethylene film for melon production. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 8:123125.Google Scholar
21. Waggoner, P. E., Miller, P. M., and De Roo, J. C. 1960. Plastic mulching, principles and benefits. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 634. 144.Google Scholar
22. Wells, O. S. and Loy, J. B. 1981. Slitted plastic row covers for vegetable production. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 16:124128.Google Scholar
23. Wien, H. C. and Bell, D. 1981. Polyethylene tunnels and other protective row covers for production of early vegetables in New York State. Proc. Nat. Agric. Plast. Conf. 16:92102.Google Scholar