Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:29:22.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) on Snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Ray Frank
J. Ray Frank*
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Ft. Detrick, Bldg. 1301, Frederick, MD 21701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1987 and 1988 at Frederick, MD, to determine established horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.) interference with snapbean. Horsenettle grown for 3 yr prior to planting snapbeans reduced yield 65% in 1987 and 48% in 1988. Horsenettle established for 1 yr reduced snapbean yield 20 and 18% in 1987 and 1988, respectively. As the distance of the snapbean row from the horsenettle row increased, there was less effect on the yield of snapbean. In 1987, snapbean yield in rows 15, 30, or 60 cm from horsenettle was reduced 43, 29, and 15%, respectively, while during 1988 in the same plots snapbean yields were reduced 38, 26, and 11%. Eight horsenettle planted in a 4.6-m row the first year and 16 horsenettle per row for the second year reduced snapbean yield 36 and 55% respectively. Horsenettle fruit number was 16% lower the first year and 45% lower the second year when snapbeans were grown at a 15-cm row spacing instead of a 60-cm row spacing.

Keywords

Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. ♯ SOLCA, Phaseolus vulgaris L. v. ‘Gallatin Valley’Weed interactioncompetitionconservation tillageinterferencePhaseolus vulgarisSolanum carolinenseSOLCA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 220 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1978. Glyphosate for weed control in apple orchards. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:189.Google Scholar
2. Albert, W. B. 1960. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) in pastures. Weeds 8:680–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Banks, P. A., Kirby, M. A., and Santelman, P. W. 1977. Influence of postemergence and subsurface layered herbicides on horsenettle and peanuts. Weed Sci. 25:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. 1981. Changing weed problems with conservation tillage. Pages 167–174 in Conference on Crop Production with Conservation in the 1980's. Am. Soc. Agric. Engin. Publ. 7–81.Google Scholar
5. Carroll, R. J. and Ruppert, D. 1988. Pages 9–83 in Transformation and Weighting in Regression. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frank, J. R. 1988. The influence of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.) on snapbean growth. HortScience 23 (3):796.Google Scholar
7. Frank, J. R. and King, J. A. 1979. Metolachlor and alachlor for weed control in establishing woody nursery stock. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:228–231.Google Scholar
8. Freeland, T. R. 1982. The biology and control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.). Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. M.S. Thesis. 37 pp.Google Scholar
9. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1981. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) fleshy roots in pastures. Weed Sci. 29:586–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1988. Translocation and fate of dicamba, picloram, and triclopyr in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense). Weed Sci. 36:447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Verhalan, L. M. 1987. Full-season interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987. Interference of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:780–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ilnicki, R. D., Tisdell, T. F., Fertig, S. N., and Furrer, A. H. Jr. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in the Northeast 3. Horsenettle. Rhode Island Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull No. 368.Google Scholar
14. Jordan, T. N., Bauman, T. T., and Williams, J. L. 1979. Weed problems in reduced and no-till production. Weed Sci. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. BP-10–11. Purdue Univ. 4 pp.Google Scholar
15. Kendig, J. A. and Talbert, R. E. 1986. Horsenettle control in blueberries. Proc. 1986 Arkansas Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:95–97.Google Scholar
16. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Page 289 in Poisonous plants in the U.S. and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google Scholar
17. McGregor, J. T., Smith, R. J., and Talbert, R. E. 1988. Interspecific and intraspecific interference of broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 36:589–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Minotti, P. L. and Sweet, R. D. 1981. Role of crop competition in limiting losses from weeds. Pages 351–367 in Pimentel, D., ed. Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Vol. n. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
19. SAS Users Guide: Statistics, Version 6.03 Edition. 1988. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
20. Wehtje, G., Wilcut, J. W., Vint Hicks, T., and Sims, G. R. 1987. Reproductive biology and control of Solanum dimidiatum and Solanum carolinense . Weed Sci. 35:356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar