Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:46:37.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of pine bark and gravel on degradation of isoxaben in retention basins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gretchen L. Jameson ,
Jeanne A. Briggs ,
Ted Whitwell ,
R. Thomas Fernandez  and
Melissa B. Riley
Gretchen L. Jameson
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Box 340375, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Ted Whitwell
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Box 340375, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
R. Thomas Fernandez
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48825
Melissa B. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicides applied to container plants in nurseries are transported in runoff water to on- and off-site ponds and retention basins. This study was conducted to determine biotic and abiotic effects on isoxaben dissipation in model flow-through retention basins to maximize aqueous isoxaben degradation. Field studies were conducted in 1999 and 2000 to evaluate the effects of gravel and pine bark amendments and water retention times on isoxaben persistence in holding basins. In 1999, total isoxaben discharge into flow-through gravel-filled basins was greater than isoxaben losses from gravel and nongravel basins in which water was retained. Photodegradation appeared to be greater in basins without gravel, indicating that gravel protected isoxaben from photolysis. Further studies determined the effect of water retention time and the presence of aged pine bark amendment on isoxaben discharge from basins. Isoxaben discharge level was reduced when water retention time was increased from 3 to 5 d. In the 3-d retention time treatment, added pine bark reduced peak isoxaben discharge by 45% and total isoxaben by 53% at 14 d after treatment. In treatments containing pine bark within the retention basins, isoxaben was released over a longer period of time. No differences were observed in 5-d water retention time treatments with and without pine bark. Analysis of gravel from isoxaben-treated retention basins indicated the presence of several genera of bacteria including Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter, and Cellulomonas. Some isolates of Pseudomonas, Rahnella, Methobacterium, and Paenibacillus from the basins grew on M9 medium with isoxaben as the sole carbon and energy source, indicating their ability to metabolize isoxaben. Results indicate that retention basins are helpful in reducing isoxaben levels before release or reuse of runoff water from a container nursery, and that retention time of runoff water in basins is the most important factor in reducing isoxaben discharge.

Keywords

IsoxabenAdsorptionaqueous degradationcontainer plant productionherbicide runoffmicrobial degradationphotolysis
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 158 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhandary, R. M., Whitwell, T., and Briggs, J. 1997. Growth of containerized landscape plants is influenced by herbicide residues in irrigation water. Weed Technol 11:793–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, J. A., Riley, M. B., and Whitwell, T. 1998. Quantification and remediation of pesticides in runoff water from containerized plant production. J. Environ. Qual 27:814–820.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. A., Whitwell, T., and Riley, M. B. 1999. Remediation of herbicides in runoff water from container plant nurseries utilizing grassed waterways. Weed Technol 13:157–164.Google Scholar
Corio-Costet, M. F., Dall'Agnese, M., and Scalla, R. 1991. Effects of isoxaben on sensitive and tolerant plant cell cultures I. Metabolic fate of isoxaben. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 40:246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cote, R. J. and Gherna, R. L. 1994. Nutrition and media. Pages 155–178 in Gerhardt, P., Murray, R.G.E., Wood, W. A., and Krieg, N. R. eds. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, E., Carlton, B. C., and Brown, B. J. 1994. Gene mutation. Pages 297–316 in Gerhardt, P., Murray, R.G.E., Wood, W. A., and Krieg, N. R. eds. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
Gilliam, C. H., Fare, D. C., and Beasley, A. 1992. Nontarget herbicide losses from application of granular Ronstar to container nurseries. J. Environ. Hortic 10:175–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, M., Kotzias, D., and Korte, F. 1987. Photoreactivation of humic acid in natural waters. Chemosphere 16:523–525.Google Scholar
Huggenberger, F. and Ryan, P. J. 1985. The biological activity of EL-107 and its mobility and degradation in soil. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3:947–954.Google Scholar
Keese, R. J., Camper, N. D., Whitwell, T., Riley, M. B., and Wilson, P. C. 1994. Herbicide runoff from ornamental container nurseries. J. Environ. Qual 23:320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly Research Laboratories. 1987. Technical report on EL-107. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
MacDonald, E. M. S. and Morris, R. O. 1985. Isolation of cytokinins by immunoaffinity chromatography and analysis by high performance liquid chromatography radioimmunoassay. Methods Enzymol 110:347–358.Google Scholar
Mamouni, A., Schmitt, P., Mansour, M., and Schiavon, M. 1992. Abiotic degradation pathways of isoxaben in the environment. Pestic. Sci 35:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, J. C. and Senesac, A. F. 1990. Summer annual and winter annual weed control in field soil and soilless media with Gallery (isoxaben). J. Environ. Hortic 8:124–127.Google Scholar
Potrawfke, T., Timmis, K. N., and Wittich, R. M. 1998. Degradation of 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene by Pseudomonas chlororaphis RW71. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 64:3798–3806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, L. M., Harley, J. P., and Klein, D. A. 1999. Bacteria: The proteobacteria. Pages 458–487. Terrestrial environments. Pages 885–906 in Microbiology, 4th ed. Boston, MA: WCB McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rouchaud, J., Gustin, F., Callens, D., Van Himme, M., and Bulcke, R. 1993a. Soil metabolism of the herbicide isoxaben in winter wheat crops. J. Agric. Food Chem 41:2142–2148.Google Scholar
Rouchaud, J., Gustin, F., Van Himme, M., Bulcke, R., and Sarrazyn, R. 1993b. Soil dissipation of the herbicide isoxaben after use in cereals. Weed Res 33:205–212.Google Scholar
Rouchaud, J., Neus, O., Bulcke, R., Callens, D., and Dekkers, T. 1997. Isoxaben soil biodegradation in pear tree orchard after repeated high dose application. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 33:247–251.Google Scholar
Rouchaud, J., Neus, O., Labeke, M. C., Cools, K., and Bulcke, R. 1999. Isoxaben and BAS 479 14H retention/loss from peat substrate of nursery plants. Weed Sci 47:602–607.Google Scholar
Roy, W. R., Krapac, I. G., and Chou, S-F. J. 1999. Chemical fate and transport of atrazine in soil gravel materials at agrichemical distribution facilities. J. Soil Contam 8:365–387.Google Scholar
Sasser, M. 2001. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. Technical Note 101. May 1990, revised February 2001. Newark, DE: MIDI, p. 6.Google Scholar
Schaffner, I. R. Jr., Wieck, J. M., and Lamb, S. R. 1998. Taking microbial roll call. Pollut. Eng 40:40–42.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 265–266.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1987. Evaluation of a simulation model for prediction of herbicide movement and persistence in soil. Weed Res 27:143–152.Google Scholar
Wenk, M., Baumgartner, T., Dobovsek, J., Fuchs, T., Kucsera, J., Zopfi, J., and Stucki, G. 1998. Rapid mineralization of soil slurry and moist soil by inoculation of an atrazine-degrading Pseudomonas sp. strain. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 49:624–630.Google Scholar
Widmer, S. K. and Spalding, R. F. 1995. A natural gradient transport study of selected herbicides. J. Environ. Qual 24:445–453.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. C., Whitwell, T., and Klaine, S. J. 1999. Phytotoxicity, uptake, and distribution of [14C] simazine in Canna hybrida ‘Yellow King Humbert’. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 18:1462–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. C., Whitwell, T., and Klaine, S. J. 2000a. Metalaxyl and simazine toxicity to and uptake by Typha latifolia . Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 39:282–288.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. C., Whitwell, T., and Klaine, S. J. 2000b. Phytotoxicity, uptake, and distribution of 14C-simazine in Acorus gramenius and Pontederia cordata . Weed Sci 48:701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. C., Whitwell, T., and Riley, M. B. 1995. Effects of ground cover and formulation on herbicides in runoff water from miniature nursery sites. Weed Sci 43:671–677.Google Scholar