Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:59:20.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Repeated Applications of 2,4-D on Yield and Juice Quality of Concord Grapes (Vitis labruscana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Alex G. Ogg Jr. ,
M. Ahmed Ahmedullah  and
Gale M. Wright
Alex G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., U.S. Agric. Res. Serv., 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
M. Ahmed Ahmedullah
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. and Landscape Arch., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Gale M. Wright
Affiliation:
Washington State Univ., Prosser, WA 99350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In two field experiments over a 4-yr period, 2,4-D amine applied up to four times per year from late April to early June at 2.5, 10, and 25 ppmw produced a wide range of symptoms on ‘Concord’ grapes. When 2,4-D symptoms in July were severe, yields were reduced by as much as 85%. However, when 2,4-D symptoms in July were slight (less than 2 on a 0 to 6 visual scale), grape yields were not reduced. A second-order polynomial described well (R2 = 0.92) the relationship between symptoms and grape yield. Symptoms of 2,4-D on grape leaves did not persist beyond the year of treatment, although grape yields did not recover fully until the second year after the last 2,4-D treatment In the first year of 2,4-D treatments, low grape yields were correlated with reduced weight and number of berries per cluster. In the second and third year of treatment, low grape yields were correlated with fewer clusters per shoot in addition to lower cluster weight and fewer berries per cluster. When 2,4-D was applied one year only, soluble solids in the grape juice were reduced as much as 9%, although reductions were not related to severity of foliar symptoms. When 2,4-D was applied for three consecutive years, soluble solids in the juice were consistently higher in grapes with moderate to severe 2,4-D symptoms. There were no consistent effects of 2,4-D on juice color or titratable acidity. The pH of fresh juice was increased slightly by 2,4-D with the maximum being 10% after 3 yr of consecutive treatments. In the first subsequent non-treatment year after 3 yr of 2,4-D treatments, juice quality was similar to the quality of nontreated grapes. At a detection limit of 0.05 ppmw, 2,4-D was not detected in the harvested grapes. Based on the results of these experiments, grapes with slight 2,4-D symptoms would not be expected to have reduced yields or reduced juice quality.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidgrapes, Vitis labruscana L. ‘Concord’Herbicidedriftphototoxicitysoluble solidscolorpHtitratable acidity
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 284 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, D. F., Jackson, C. M., and Bamesberger, W. L. 1964. Quantitative studies of 2,4-D esters in the air. Weeds 12:280–283.Google Scholar
2. Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1987. United States standards for grades of canned grape juice. Pages 263—266 in Code of Federal Regulations, Agriculture 7, Part 52, Subpart 1341. Office of the Federal Register, U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3. Amerine, M. A. and Ough, C. S. 1974. Total (titratable) acidity. Pages 15—16 in Wine and Must Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Bruce, J. R. and Denisen, E. L. 1976. Resistance, tolerance, and susceptibility of several grape cultivars to volatile esters of 2,4-D. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:109–113.Google Scholar
5. Clore, W. J. 1972. 2,4-D on Concord grapes. Wash. State Grape Soc. Proc. Grandview, WA. Pages 29—32.Google Scholar
6. Clore, W. J. and Bruns, V. F. 1953. The sensitivity of the Concord grape to 2,4-D. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 61:125–134.Google Scholar
7. Clore, W. J., Neubert, A. M., Carter, G. H., Ingalsbe, D. W., and Brummond, V. P. 1965. Composition of Washington-produced Concord grapes and juices. Washington Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 48. 21.Google Scholar
8. Clore, W. J. and Tukey, R. B. 1972. Trellising and training grapes for production in Washington. Ext. Bull. 637. Coll. Agric., Wash. State Univ. 12.Google Scholar
9. Comes, R. D., Marquis, L. Y., and Kelley, A. D. 1984. Response of Concord grapes (Vitis labrusca) to 2,4-D in irrigation water. Weed Sci. 32:455–459.Google Scholar
10. Farwell, S. O., Robinson, E., Powell, W. J., and Adams, D. F. 1976. Survey of airborne 2,4-D in south-central Washington. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 26:224–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Food and Drug Administration. 1969. Chlorinated organic residues (ionic). General method for nonfatty foods. Section 222 in Pesticide Analytical Manual. Vol. 1. Foods and Feeds. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
12. Freund, R. J. and Littrell, R. C. 1986. SAS System for Regression. 1986 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
13. Jackson, D. I. 1986. Factors affecting soluble solids, acid, pH, and color in grapes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 37:179–183.Google Scholar
14. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. W., Kutner, M. H. 1985. Residual analysis. Pages 609—615 in Applied Linear Statistical Models, Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
15. Ries, S. K. 1976. Subtoxic effects on plants. Chapter 11. Pages 313—334 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicide-Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. II. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
16. Shaulis, N. J. and Pratt, C. 1965. Grapes: Their growth and development. Farm Res. Reprint No. 401. Cornell Univ., New York State Agric. Exp. Stn., Geneva, New York. 2.Google Scholar
17. Van Andel, O. M., Van der Zweep, W., and Gorter, C. J. 1976. Morphogenetic responses of plants. Chapter 4. Pages 127—163 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides-Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. I. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
18. Weaver, R. J. 1976. Grape Growing. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 371.Google Scholar
19. Weaver, R. J. 1970. Some effects on grapevine of exogenous plant regulators and herbicides. Pages 247—254 in Frazier, N. W., ed. Virus Diseases of Small Fruits and Grapevines. Univ. Calif. Div. Agric. Sciences, Berkeley.Google Scholar
20. Weaver, R. J., Leonard, O. A., and McCune, S. B. 1961. Response of Tokay grapes to spray applications of 2,4-D. Hilgardia 31:419–433.Google Scholar
21. Weigle, J. L., Denison, E. L., and Sherwood, C. H. 1970. 2,4-D as an air pollutant: Effects on market quality of several horticultural crops. Hortic. Sci. 5:213–214.Google Scholar