Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:58:21.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Soil Moisture on Phytotoxicity of Cinmethylin to Various Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven G. Russell
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Thomas J. Monaco
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Jerome B. Weber
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to determine the effects of moisture on cinmethylin activity. The herbicide was applied preemergence at rates of 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 kg ai ha−1 to both dry and moist sandy loam soil, followed by varying irrigation regimes. Plant species used in the study included soybean, snap bean, cotton, peanut, and cucumber. Peanut was the most tolerant to cinmethylin, followed by cotton, soybean, snap bean, and cucumber. When cinmethylin was applied to a moist soil, less crop injury resulted than when it was applied to a dry soil. If 7.6 cm of water was applied shortly after cinmethylin application to a dry soil, severe crop injury occurred. When 2.5 cm of irrigation was applied within 8 h or at 5 days after cinmethylin application to a dry soil, crop injury was reduced when compared to applying 7.6 cm irrigation.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Achelladelis, B. and Hanson, J. R. 1968. Studies in terpenoid biosynthesis—III. The incorporation of geranyl pyrophosphate into cineole. Phytochemistry 7:13171319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1985. CINCH Herbicide Technical Manual. Shell Chemical Co. Pages 125.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1987. SAS User's Guide: Basics. SAS Institute, Inc. Pages 731762.Google Scholar
4. Birch, A. J., Boulter, D., Fryer, R. I., Thomson, P. J., and Willis, J. L. 1959. The biosynthesis of citronellal and of cineole in Eucalyptus . Tetrahedron Lett. 3:12.Google Scholar
5. Bozarth, G. A., May, J. W., Goss, J. R., and Long, J. H. 1984. CINCH Herbicide (SD 95481): a new soil-applied herbicide for use in broadleaf crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:390.Google Scholar
6. Haagen-Smit, A. J. 1958. The lower terpenes. Encycl. Plant Physiol. 10:5290.Google Scholar
7. Hogg, J. W., Terhune, S. J., and Lawrence, B. M. 1974. Dehydro-1,8-cineole: a new monoterpene oxide in Laurus nobilis oil. Phytochemistry 13:868869.Google Scholar
8. Houseworth, L. D. and Tweedy, B. G. 1971. Interactions of light, temperature and moisture on terbutryn toxicity. Weed Sci. 19:732735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Liu, S. L. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Retention and mobility of AC 252,214, chlorsulfuron, prometryn, and SD 95481 in soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:465474.Google Scholar
10. Lorber, P. and Muller, W. H. 1980. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by Salvia leucophylla: effects on metabolic activity in mitochondrial suspensions. Comp. Physiol. Ecol. 5(2):6875.Google Scholar
11. May, J. W. and Goss, J. R. 1985. Cinmethylin (CINCH Herbicide) for use in vegetable, vine, tree and ornamental crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:121.Google Scholar
12. Mehlich, A. 1976. New buffer pH method for rapid estimation of exchangeable acidity and lime requirements of soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 7:637653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:14091416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mehlich, A. 1984. Photometric determination of humic matter in soils, a proposed method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:14171422.Google Scholar
15. Monaco, T. J. and Bonanno, A. R. 1985. CINCH: a promising new herbicide for vegetable crops? Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:120.Google Scholar
16. Muller, W. H. 1965. Volatile materials produced by Salvia leucophylla: effects on seedling growth and soil bacteria. Bot. Gaz. 126:195200.Google Scholar
17. Muller, W. H. and Muller, C. H. 1964. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by Salvia species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 91:327330.Google Scholar
18. Muller, W. H. and Hauge, R. 1967. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by Salvia leucophylla: effect on seedling anatomy. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 94:182191.Google Scholar
19. Price, T. P., May, J. W., and Wittsell, L. E. 1983. Control of annual grasses and broadleaved weeds in soybeans with SD 95481. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:157.Google Scholar
20. Russell, S. G., Monaco, T. J., and Weber, J. B. 1990. Influence of simulated rainfall and soil moisture on herbicidal activity of cinmethylin. Weed Sci. 38:267272.Google Scholar
21. Upchurch, R. P. 1951. The influence of soil moisture content on the response of cotton to herbicides. Weeds 5:112120.Google Scholar
22. Walker, A. 1971. Effects of soil moisture content on the availability of soil-applied herbicides to plants. Pestic. Sci. 2:5659.Google Scholar
23. Wendt, D. R. 1988. Adsorption/desorption of cinmethylin and metolachlor on soils and soil constituents. MS. Thesis, Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ. Google Scholar
24. Wittsell, L. E. and May, J. W. 1983. Impact of rainfall on the performance of SD 95481. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:154155.Google Scholar