Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:00:06.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of surface and subsurface soil properties on atrazine sorption and degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Brian M. Jenks ,
Fred W. Roeth ,
Alex R. Martin  and
Dennis L. McCallister
Brian M. Jenks*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of Agronomy, Lincoln, NE 68583
Fred W. Roeth
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, South Central Research and Extension Center, Clay Center, NE 68933
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of Agronomy, Lincoln, NE 68583
Dennis L. McCallister
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of Agronomy, Lincoln, NE 68583
*
Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies to predict pesticide fate often lack measurements of model input parameters. Using independent data sets and understanding how soil properties affect herbicide retention and degradation may result in more accurate prediction of herbicide fate. We conducted laboratory studies to determine the influence of soil properties on atrazine adsorption and degradation. These data will be used in a separate study involving a pesticide fate model. Atrazine adsorption and desorption isotherms were constructed for six soil depths of a Hastings silty clay loam (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Udic Argiustoll) using batch equilibration. The Freundlich adsorption constants (log Kf ) ranged from 0.38 (60 to 90 cm) to 2.91 (0 to 30 cm). Adsorption was higher in the low pH, high organic matter-containing surface soil compared to the lower soil depths. Multiple regression of the adsorption constants against selected soil properties indicated that organic matter content was the best single predictor of atrazine adsorption (R 2 = 0.98) followed by soil pH (R 2 = 0.82). Combining organic matter and cation exchange capacity in the model produced the lowest Cp statistic (2.33) and highest R 2 value (0.99). We observed hysteresis in atrazine adsorption–desorption isotherms by higher adsorption slopes (1/n)ads compared to desorption slopes (1/n)des. Soils that adsorbed more atrazine also desorbed less atrazine. Desorption correlated negatively with organic matter content and positively with soil pH. Atrazine degradation after 84 d of incubation generally decreased with increasing depth. The first-order degradation rate was highest 0 to 30 cm deep (0.0187 day−1) and lowest 270 to 300 cm deep (0.0031 day−1). Atrazine degradation was faster in soil treated annually for 12 yr than in soil with no previous atrazine history (p = 0.01).

Keywords

Pesticideherbicidehysteresisgroundwater qualitycontaminationFreundlichbound residueherbicide leaching
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 132 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, NE 69361; brian@mortsun.unl.edu

References

Literature Cited

Adams, C. D. and Thurman, E. M. 1991. Formation and transport of deethylatrazine in the soil and vadose zone. J. Environ. Qual. 20: 540–547.Google Scholar
Assaf, N. A. and Turco, R. F. 1994. Accelerated biodegradation of atrazine by a microbial consortium is possible in culture and soil. Biodegradation 5: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, J. U., Powers, W. L., Shea, P. J., and Stuefer-Powell, C. L. 1992. Pore size distribution index as an indicator of atrazine movement in a Crete silt loam soil. Soil Sci. 154: 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. R. and Warncke, D. 1988. Recommended cation tests and measures of cation exchange capacity. Pages 15–16 in Dahnke, W. C., ed. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Bulletin No. 499. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University.Google Scholar
Clay, S. A., Allmaras, R. R., Koskinen, W. C., and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Desorption of atrazine and cyanazine from soil. J. Environ. Qual. 17: 719–723.Google Scholar
Clay, S. A. and Koskinen, W. C. 1990a. Characterization of alachlor and atrazine desorption from soils. Weed Sci. 38: 74–80.Google Scholar
Clay, S. A. and Koskinen, W. C. 1990b. Adsorption and desorption of atrazine, hydroxyatrazine, and s-glutathione atrazine on two soils. Weed Sci. 38: 262–266.Google Scholar
Comfort, S. D., Shea, P. J., and Roeth, F. W. 1994. Understanding Pesticides and Water Quality in Nebraska. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Cooperative Extension Publication. EC 94–135. 16 p.Google Scholar
Dao, T. H. and Lavy, T. L. 1978. Atrazine adsorption on soil as influenced by temperature, moisture content and electrolyte concentration. Weed Sci. 26: 303–308.Google Scholar
Dao, T. H., Lavy, T. L., and Sorensen, R. C. 1979. Atrazine degradation and residue distribution in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43: 1129–1133.Google Scholar
Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. Pages 562–566 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Durand, G. and Barcelo, D. 1992. Environmental degradation of atrazine, linuron, and fenitrothion in soil samples. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 36: 225–234.Google Scholar
Eckert, D. J. 1988. Recommended pH and lime requirement rests. Pages 6–8 in Dahnke, W. C., ed. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Bulletin No. 499. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. A. and Jurinak, J. J. 1973. Estimation of activity coefficients from the electrical conductivity of natural aquatic systems and soil extracts. Soil Sci. 116: 26–30.Google Scholar
Harris, C. I., Woolson, E. A., and Hummer, B. E. 1969. Dissipation of herbicides at three depths. Weed Sci. 17: 27–31.Google Scholar
Helling, C. S. and Gish, T. J. 1986. Soil characteristics affecting pesticide movement into ground water. Pages 14–38 in Gatner, W. Y., Honeycutt, R. C., and Nigg, H. N., eds. Evaluation of Pesticides in Ground Water. Symposium Ser. 315. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Kruger, E. L., Somasundaram, L., Kanwar, R. S., and Coats, J. R. 1993. Persistence and degradation of [14C] atrazine and [14C] deisopropylatrazine as affected by soil depth and moisture conditions. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12: 1959–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, D. A., Barriuso, E., Dowdy, R. H., and Koskinen, W. C. 1992. Adsorption of atrazine on smectites. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavy, T. L., Roeth, F. W., and Fenster, C. R. 1973. Degradation of 2,4-D and atrazine at three soil depths in the field. J. Environ. Qual. 2: 132–137.Google Scholar
Linn, D. M. and Doran, J. W. 1984. Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nonfilled soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48: 1267–1272.Google Scholar
Ma, L., Southwick, L. M., Willis, G. H., and Selim, H. M. 1993. Hysteretic characteristics of atrazine adsorption—desorption by a Sharkey soil. Weed Sci. 41: 627–633.Google Scholar
Nash, R. G. 1988. Dissipation from soil. Page 137 in Grover, R., ed. Environmental Chemistry of Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Obien, S. R. and Green, R. E. 1969. Degradation of atrazine in four Hawaiian soils. Weed Sci. 17: 509–514.Google Scholar
Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Atrazine degradation in two soil profiles. Weed Sci. 17: 202–205.Google Scholar
Roy, W. R. and Krapac, I. G. 1994. Adsorption and desorption of atrazine and deethylatrazine by low organic carbon geologic materials. J. Environ. Qual. 23: 549–556.Google Scholar
Roy, W. R., Krapac, I. G., Chou, S.F.J., and Griffin, R. A. 1992. Batch-type procedures for estimating soil adsorption of chemicals. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Technical Resources Doc. 530/SW-87-006-F. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989a. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed., Volume 1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989b. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed., Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1990. Procedures Guide. Version 6, 3rd ed., Volume 1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Schulte, E. E. 1988. Recommended soil organic matter tests. Pages 29–32 in Dahnke, W. C., ed. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Bulletin No. 499. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University.Google Scholar
Shea, P. J. 1989. Role of humified organic matter in herbicide adsorption. Weed Technol. 3: 190–197.Google Scholar
Skipper, H. D. and Volk, V V. 1972. Biological and chemical degradation of atrazine in three Oregon soils. Weed Sci. 20: 344–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolpe, N. B. and Shea, P. J. 1995. Alachlor and atrazine degradation in a Nebraska soil and underlying sediment. Soil Sci. 160: 359–370.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1987. Hetbicide persistence in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 1–17.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Welch, S. J. 1991. Enhanced degradation of some soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 31: 49–57.Google Scholar