Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:22:02.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of tuber size and shoot removal on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) regrowth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bielinski M. Santos ,
Jose P. Morales-Payan ,
William M. Stall  and
Thomas A. Bewick
Jose P. Morales-Payan
Affiliation:
Horticulture Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690
William M. Stall
Affiliation:
Horticulture Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690
Thomas A. Bewick
Affiliation:
Horticulture Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the extent of purple nutsedge tuber depletion and shoot regrowth when shoots were removed periodically from plants sprouting from tubers of different original weights. Presprouted purple nutsedge tubers were planted in 0.5-L plastic containers filled with potting medium. Tuber weight categories were 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1 g per tuber. Shoots were removed by cutting at soil level beginning 6, 12, 18, 24, or 30 d after transplanting (DAT). Shoot removal occurred every 6 d after the first removal with a minimum of seven removals. Tuber weight had an effect on both shoot number and dry weight when the first removal was imposed either 6 or 12 DAT. When initial shoot removal was begun 6 DAT, total tuber depletion was achieved after the fifth removal for tubers weighing 0.25 g and after the seventh removal for tubers weighing 0.50 g. When the initial removal was delayed until 12 DAT, only tubers weighing 0.25 g were depleted after the sixth removal. No tuber depletion occurred for tubers weighing 0.75 g or more at any initial removal time. Greater initial sprouting vigor was observed among large tubers compared to smaller ones. Early removal (6 DAT) promoted the formation of more shoots from tubers weighing 0.75 or 1 g.

Keywords

Purple nutsedgeCyperus rotundus L.CYPROPurple nutsedge regrowthpurple nutsedge sproutingphysical removalcultural controltuber size
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 681 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bendixen, L. E. and Nandihalli, U. B. 1987. Worldwide distribution of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1: 61–65.Google Scholar
Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17: 338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. H. and Hawkins, R. S. 1943. Eradication and Control of Nutgrass. Phoenix, AZ: Atizona Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 751.Google Scholar
Day, B. E. and Russel, R. C. 1955. The Effect of Drying on Survival of Nutgrass Tubers. Berkeley, CA: California Agricultural Station Bulletin No. 751, p. 7.Google Scholar
Downton, W. J. and Tregunna, E. R. 1968. Carbon dioxide compensation—its relation to photosynthetic carboxylation reactions, systematics of the Gramineae, and leaf anatomy. Can. J. Bot. 46: 207–215.Google Scholar
Glaze, N. C. 1987. Cultural and mechanical manipulation of Cyperus spp. Weed Technol. 1: 82–83.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World&s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL: Krieger, p. 8.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1965. Data on the biology and chemical control of the nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) in Israel. PANS 11: 389–416.Google Scholar
Okoli, C.A.N., Shilling, D. G., Smith, R. L., and Bewick, T A. 1996. Distribution and genotypes of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36: 47.Google Scholar
Rao, J. S. 1968. Studies of the development of tubers in nutgrass and their starch content at different depths of soil. Madras Agric. J. 55: 18–23.Google Scholar
Smith, E. V. and Mayton, E. L. 1939. Nutgrass eradication studies: II. The eradication of nutgrass, Cyperus rotundus L., by certain tillage treatments. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 30: 18–21.Google Scholar
Smith, E. V. and Mayton, E. L. 1942. Nutgrass eradication studies: III. The eradication of nutgrass, Cyperus rotundus L., on several soil types by tillage. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34: 151–159.Google Scholar
Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1975. Yellow nutsedge sprouting and resprouting potential. Weed Sci. 23: 333–337.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. 1987. Description of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1: 2–9.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. and Briscoe, G. A. 1970. Anatomy of purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 18: 631–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar