Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:31:03.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of Dicamba Resistance in Wild Mustard (Brassica kaber)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marie Jasieniuk ,
Ian N. Morrison  and
Anita L. Brûlé-Babel
Marie Jasieniuk
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Ian N. Morrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Anita L. Brûlé-Babel
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inheritance of resistance to dicamba in wild mustard was determined by making reciprocal crosses between a resistant (R) population derived from a field treated repeatedly with auxin-type herbicides, and a known susceptible (S) population. The resulting F1 hybrids were selfed to produce F2 populations and backcrossed to the S parent. At the three- to four-leaf stage, parental, F1, F2, and backcross populations were screened for resistance to dicamba at three dosages (50, 200, and 400 g ai ha−1). F1 progeny survived all dosages and exhibited levels of injury similar to the R parental population. F2 populations segregated in a 3:1 ratio of R to S phenotypes. Progeny of backcrosses segregated in a 1:1 (R:S) ratio. Responses of the F1, F2, and backcross populations to treatment with dicamba indicate that resistance is determined by a single, completely dominant nuclear allele.

Keywords

Dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidwild mustard, Brassica kaber(DC.) L. C. Wheeler, Sinapis arvensis L. #3 SINARGeneticsherbicide resistanceauxinSinapis arvensisSINAR
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 192 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Darmency, H. 1994. Genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. Pages 263–297 in Powles, S. and Holtum, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
2. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. Pages 325–347 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
3. Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1992. Resistance to auxin-type herbicides in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) populations in western Canada. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 32:55.Google Scholar
4. Ito, T. 1981. Feasible selfed seed production methods in self-incompatible crucifer lines. Pages 345–355 in Takekar, N. S. and Griggs, T. D., eds. Chinese Cabbage. Asian Veg. Res. Dev. Ctr., Shanhua, Taiwan.Google Scholar
5. Jasieniuk, M., Brûté-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1995. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in agricultural weeds. Rev. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
6. LeBaron, H. M. 1991. Distribution and seriousness of herbicide-resistant weed infestations worldwide. Pages 27–43 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
7. Morrison, I. N. and Devine, M. D. 1994. Herbicide resistance in the Canadian prairie provinces: five years after the fact. Phytoprotection 75(Suppl.):5–16.Google Scholar
8. Mulligan, G. A. and Bailey, L. G. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 8. Sinapis arvensis L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:171–183.Google Scholar
9. Peniuk, M. G., Romano, M. L., and Hall, J. C. 1993. Physiological investigations into the resistance of a wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotype to auxinic herbicides. Weed Res. 33:431–440.Google Scholar