Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:07:47.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated management of itchgrass in a corn cropping system: modeling the effect of control tactics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

M. C. Smith ,
B. E. Valverde ,
A. Merayo  and
J. F. Fonseca
B. E. Valverde
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Unit, Tropical Agricultural Centre for Research and Higher Education (CATIE), Turrialba 07170, Coasta Rica
A. Merayo
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Unit, Tropical Agricultural Centre for Research and Higher Education (CATIE), Turrialba 07170, Coasta Rica
J. F. Fonseca
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Unit, Tropical Agricultural Centre for Research and Higher Education (CATIE), Turrialba 07170, Coasta Rica
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A population model of itchgrass was developed for a typical corn–based cropping system in the Pacific coastal region of Costa Rica. Field experiments were conducted to quantify density-dependent seedling mortality and fecundity. Additional information required for the model was obtained from the literature. Effect of control methods on itchgrass density—including a leguminous cover crop (velvetbean), a preemergence herbicide (pendimethalin), and classical biocontrol with the head smut—alone and in combination, were investigated using the model. According to model results, the cover crop planted at high and low densities between corn rows was highly efficient, reducing the initial itchgrass density from 54 plants m−2 to 4 and 17 plants m−2, respectively. Associating velvetbean with corn solely in the first crop each year resulted in predicted itchgrass densities of 33 and 36 plants m−2 (at high and low cover crop planting densities, respectively). The improvement in corn yield from preemergence herbicide or biocontrol in addition to the cover crop was only modest. This indicated that if, in practice, the cover crop is as effective as predicted, an inexpensive control tactic such as biological control (provided that an infection rate of at least 50% can be achieved) should be given priority to prevent income losses.

Keywords

Pendimethalincorn, Zea mays L.head smut, Sporisorium ophiuri [P. Henn] Vanky [Ustilaginales]itchgrass, Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W. Clayton RODEXvelvetbean, Mucuna deeringiana Merr.Biological controlcover croppopulation dynamicsRODEX
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 123 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aison, S., Johnson, M. K., and Harger, T. R. 1984. Role of birds in dispersal of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata (L.) L.f.) seeds in the south-eastern USA. Prot. Ecol. 6:307–313.Google Scholar
Cherwell Scientific Publishing. Ltd. 1997. ModelMaker. User Manual, Version 3. Oxford, United Kingdom: Cherwell Scientific Publishing. 362 pp.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R., Doyle, C. J., Wilson, B. J., and Cussans, G. W. 1986. Modelling the economics of controlling Avena fatua in wheat. Pestic. Sci. 17:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de la Cruz, R., Rojas, C. E., and Merayo, A. 1994. Manejo de la caminadora (Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W.D. Clayton) en el cultivo de maíz y el período de barbecho con leguminosas de cobertura. Manejo Integrado Plagas 31:29–34.Google Scholar
Doyle, C. J., Cousens, R., and Moss, S. R. 1986. A model of the economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat. Crop Prot. 5:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, C. A. and Evans, H. C. 1995. Present status of the biological control programme for the graminaceous weed Rottboellia cochinchinensis . Pages 493–500 In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Melbourne, Australia: DSIR/CSIRO.Google Scholar
Firbank, L. G. and Watkinson, A. R. 1986. Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effect upon crop yield. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENSTAT 5 Committee of the Statistics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1993. Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merayo, A., Fonseca, J. F., Valverde, B. E., and Umãna, E. 1998. Leguminosas de cobertura para el manejo de Rottboellia cochinchinensis en el asocio yuca/maíz. Manejo Integrado Plagas 48:49–53.Google Scholar
Mercado, B. L. 1978. Biology, Problems and Control of Rottboellia exaltata L.f. A Monograph. Biotrop Bulletin 14. Bogor, Indonesia: BIOTROP 39 p.Google Scholar
Reeder, R. H., Ellison, C. A., and Thomas, M. B. 1996. Population dynamic aspects of the interaction between the weed Rottboellia cochinchinensis (itchgrass) and the potential biological control agent Sporisorium ophiuri (head smut). Pages 205–211 in Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Rondebosch, South Africa: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Richards, P.V.M. and Thomas, P.E.L. 1970. An approach to the control of Rottboellia exaltata in Z. mays . Pages 689–696 In Proeedings of the 10th British Weed Control Conference. Farnham, United Kingdom: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Rojas, C. E., de la Cruz, R., and Merayo, A. 1993a. Effecto competivo de la caminadora (Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W.D. Clayton) en el cultivo del maíz (Zea mays L.). Manejo Integrado Plagas 27:42–45.Google Scholar
Rojas, C. E., de la Cruz, R., Shannon, P. J., and Merayo, A. 1993b. Study and management of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) in the Pacific region of Costa Rica. Pages 1183–1188 In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, United Kingdom: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Rojas, E., Merayo, A., and Calvo, G. 1994. La profundidad y duración en el suelo de la semilla de caminadora (Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour) W.D. Clayton) y su effecto sobre la viabilidad y persistencia en el trópico seco. Manejo Integrado Plagas 32:25–29.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. and Zelaya, O. 1986. Competition and control of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in maize (Zea mays). Trop. Pest Manag. 32:101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. C., Reeder, R. H., and Thomas, M. B. 1997. A model to determine the potential for biological control of Rottboellia cochinchinensis with the head smut Sporisorium ophiuri . J. Appl. Ecol. 34:388–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P.E.L. 1970a. Studies on Rottboellia exaltata (Shamva grass or Guineafowl grass). Rhod. Agric. J. 70:140–142.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.E.L. 1970b. A study of the biology of Rottboellia exaltata Linn. F. Pages 669–676 In Proceedings of the 10th British Weed Control Conference. Farnham, United Kingdom: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.E.L. and Allison, J.C.S. 1975. Seed germination and dormancy in Rottboellia exaltata . J. Agric. Sci. 85:129–134.Google Scholar
Valverde, B. E., Merayo, A., Reeder, R., and Riches, C. R. 1999. Integrated management of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) in corn in seasonally-dry Central America: facts and perspectives. Pages 131–140 In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Farnham, United Kingdom: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Valverde, B. E., Merayo, A., Rojas, C. E., and Alvarez, T. 1995. Interaction between a cover crop (Mucuna. sp.), a weed (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) and a crop (maize). Pages 197–200 In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Farnham, United Kingdom: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Watkinson, A. R. 1980. Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants. J. Theor. Biol. 83:345–357.Google Scholar