Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:05:09.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Insect, Resistance, and Floral Resource Management in Weed Control Decision-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Antonio DiTommaso ,
Kristine M. Averill ,
Michael P. Hoffmann ,
Jeffrey R. Fuchsberg  and
John E. Losey
Antonio DiTommaso
Affiliation:
Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Kristine M. Averill
Affiliation:
Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Michael P. Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Jeffrey R. Fuchsberg
Affiliation:
Medical Center of the Americas Foundation, 201 E. Main Street, El Paso TX 79901
John E. Losey
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Managing agricultural pests with an incomplete understanding of the impacts that tactics have on crops, pests, and other organisms poses risks for loss of short-term profits and longer-term negative impacts, such as evolved resistance and nontarget effects. This is especially relevant for the management of weeds that are viewed almost exclusively as major impediments to crop production. Seldom considered in weed management are the benefits weeds provide in agroecosystems, which should be considered for optimal decision-making. Integration of weed costs and benefits will become increasingly important as management for pests transitions away from nearly complete reliance on herbicides and transgenic crop traits as the predominant approach for control. Here, we introduce a weed-management decision framework that accounts for weed benefits and exemplify how in-crop weed occurrence can increase crop yields in which a highly damaging insect also occurs. We highlight a case study showing how management decision-making for common milkweed, which is currently controlled primarily with glyphosate in herbicide-tolerant corn, can be improved by integrating management of the European corn borer (ECB), which is currently controlled primarily by the transgenic toxin Cry1 in Bacillus thuringiensis corn. Our data reveal that milkweed plants harboring aphids provide a food source (honeydew) for parasitoid wasps, which attack ECB eggs. Especially at high ECB population densities (> 1 egg mass leaf–1), maintaining low milkweed densities (< 1 stem m–2), effectively helps to minimize yield losses from ECB and to increase the economic injury level of this aggressive perennial weed. In addition, milkweed is the host for the monarch butterfly, so breeding-ground occurrences of the plant, including crop fields, may help sustain populations of this iconic insect. Using a more-holistic approach to integrate the management of multiple crop pests has the capacity to improve decision-making at the field scale, which can improve outcomes at the landscape scale.

Keywords

Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis Berlinerglyphosatecommon milkweed, Asclepias syriaca L.corn, Zea mays L.European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübnermilkweed aphids, Aphis asclepiadis Fitch, Aphis nerii Boyer de Fonscolome, and Myzocallis asclepiadis Monelmonarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus L.Trichogramma wasp, Trichogramma ostriniae Peng and ChenEconomic injury levelintegrated pest managementpest management decision-makingweed management
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 743 - 756
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the Weed Science Society of America

Footnotes

Associate editor for this paper: John L. Lindquist, University of Nebraska.

References

Literature Cited

Altieri, MA, Nicholls, CI, Gillespie, M, Waterhouse, B, Wratten, S, Gbéhounou, G, Gemmill-Herren, B (2015) Crops, Weeds and Pollinators: Understanding Ecological Interactions for Better Management. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 96 pGoogle Scholar
Altieri, MA, Van Schoonhoven, A, Doll, J (1977) The ecological role of weeds in insect pest management systems: a review illustrated by bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cropping systems PANS Pest Artic News Summ 23:195–205 Google Scholar
Appleby, AP (2005) A history of weed control in the United States and Canada—a sequel Weed Sci 53:762–768 Google Scholar
Bartlett, BR, Clausen, CP (1978) Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Agriculture Handbook 480. 545 pGoogle Scholar
Beaton, D, Obeid, K, Chaput, J, Cowbrough, M (2015) Guide to Weed Control 2016–2017. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Publication 75. 468 pGoogle Scholar
Bhowmik, PC (1994) Biology and control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Rev Weed Sci 6:227–250 Google Scholar
Biddinger, DJ, Rajotte, EG (2015) Integrated pest and pollinator management—adding a new dimension to an accepted paradigm Curr Opin Insect Sci 10:204–209 Google Scholar
Bode, WM, Calvin, DD (1990) Yield-loss relationships and economic injury levels for European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) populations infesting Pennsylvania field corn J Econ Entomol 83:1595–1603 Google Scholar
Bohnenblust, EW, Vaudo, AD, Egan, JF, Mortensen, DA, Tooker, JF (2016) Effects of the herbicide dicamba on nontarget plants and pollinator visitation Environ Toxicol Chem 35:144–151 Google Scholar
Bretagnolle, V, Gaba, S (2015) Weeds for bees? a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:891–909 Google Scholar
Bridges, DC (1994) Impact of weeds on human endeavors Weed Technol 8:392–395 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Hartzler, RG, Forcella, F (1997) Implications of weed seedbank dynamics to weed management Weed Sci 45:329–336 Google Scholar
Burnside, OC, Wilson, RG, Wicks, GA, Roeth, FW, Moomaw, RS (1986) Weed seed decline and buildup in soils under various corn management systems across Nebraska Agron J 78:451–454 Google Scholar
Caldwell, BA, Mohler, CL, Ketterings, QM, DiTommaso, A (2014) Yields and profitability during and after transition in organic grain cropping systems Agron J 106:871–880 Google Scholar
Capinera, JL (2005) Relationships between insect pests and weeds: an evolutionary perspective Weed Sci 53:892–901 Google Scholar
Cramer, GL, Burnside, OC (1982) Distribution and interference of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in Nebraska Weed Sci 30:385–388 Google Scholar
Curran, WS, Lingenfelter, D (2015) The Penn State Agronomy Guide 2015–2016. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Renner, KA, Gross, KL (2005) Weed seedbank and community shifts in a long-term cropping systems experiment Weed Sci 53:296–306 Google Scholar
Diffendorfer, JE, Loomis, JB, Ries, L, Oberhauser, K, Lopez-Hoffman, L, Semmens, D, Semmens, B, Butterfield, B, Bagstad, K, Goldstein, J, Wiederholt, R, Mattsson, B, Thogmartin, WE (2014) National valuation of monarch butterflies indicates an untapped potential for incentive-based conservation Conserv Lett 7:253–262 Google Scholar
Dixon, AFG, Kindlmann, P, Lepš, J, Holman, J (1987) Why there are so few species of aphids, especially in the tropics Am Nat 129:580–592 Google Scholar
Drechsler, M, Smith, H, Sturm, A, Wätzold, F (2016) Payments for conservation measures to incentivize connected habitats: cost-effectiveness of agglomeration payments, agglomeration bonuses and spatially homogeneous payments in the presence of two endangered species. Conserv Biol. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12708Google Scholar
Edwards, CB, Jordan, DL, Owen, MD, Dixon, PM, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Weller, SC, Shaw, DR (2014) Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant crop systems in the United States. Economics of herbicide resistance management practices in a 5 year field-scale study. Pest Manag Sci 70:1924–1929 Google Scholar
Egan, JF, Bohnenblust, E, Goslee, S, Mortensen, D, Tooker, J (2014) Herbicide drift can affect plant and arthropod communities Agric Ecosyst Environ 185:77–87 Google Scholar
Evetts, LL, Burnside, OC (1973) Competition of common milkweed with sorghum Agron J 65:931–932 Google Scholar
Evetts, LL, Burnside, OC (1975) Effect of early competition on growth of common milkweed Weed Sci 23:1–3 Google Scholar
Faria, CA, Wäckers, FL, Pritchard, J, Barrett, DA, Turlings, TC (2007) High susceptibility of Bt maize to aphids enhances the performance of parasitoids of Lepidopteran pests. PLoS One 2:e600 Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J, Wechsler, S, Livingston, M, Mitchell, L (2014) Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Rep 162. 60 pGoogle Scholar
Flockhart, DTT, Pichancourt, J-B, Norris, DR, Martin, TG (2015) Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: breeding-season habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies J Anim Ecol 84:155–165 Google Scholar
Fuchsberg, JR, Yong, T-H, Losey, JE, Carter, ME, Hoffmann, MP (2007) Evaluation of corn leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis; Homoptera: Aphididae) honeydew as a food source for the egg parasitoid Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Biol Control 40:230–236 Google Scholar
Gagic, V, Riggi, LG, Ekbom, B, Malsher, G, Rusch, A, Bommarco, R (2016) Interactive effects of pests increase seed yield. Ecol Evol. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2003Google Scholar
Gallandt, ER (2006) How can we target the weed seedbank? Weed Sci 54:588–596 Google Scholar
Greiner, R (2015) Factors influencing farmers’ participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists Aust J Agric Res Econ 60:1–21 Google Scholar
Hartzler, RG (2010) Reduction in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) occurrence in Iowa cropland from 1999 to 2009 Crop Prot 29:1542–1544 Google Scholar
Hartzler, RG, Buhler, DD (2000) Occurrence of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in cropland and adjacent areas Crop Prot 19:363–366 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/. Accessed April 1, 2016Google Scholar
Herbert, LH, Vazquez, DE, Arenas, A, Farina, WM (2014) Effects of field-realistic doses of glyphosate on honeybee appetitive behaviour J Exp Biol 217:3457–3464 Google Scholar
Hoffmann, MP, Pitcher, SA, Cheever, SA, Gardner, J, Losey, JE, Kuhar, TP, Laub, CA, Youngman, RR (2006) Efficacy of inoculative releases of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) against European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in field corn Biol Control 36:345–349 Google Scholar
Hoffmann, MP, Walker, DL, Shelton, AM (1995) Biology of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) reared on Ostrinia nubilalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) and survey for additional hosts Entomophaga 40:387–402 Google Scholar
Hoffmann, MP, Wright, MG, Pitcher, SA, Gardner, J (2002) Inoculative releases of Trichogramma ostriniae for suppression of Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer) in sweet corn: field biology and population dynamics Biol Control 25:249–258 Google Scholar
Holst, E (2016) Farmers Key to Bringing Monarch Butterflies Back from the Brink of Extinction. http://ecowatch.com/2016/02/16/monarch-butterflies-brink-of-extinction/. Accessed February 25, 2016Google Scholar
Honey-Rosés, J (2009) Disentangling the proximate factors of deforestation: the case of the monarch butterfly Biosphere Reserve in Mexico Land Degrad Dev 20:22–32 Google Scholar
Howard, E, Davis, AK (2015) Investigating long-term changes in the spring migration of monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) using 18 years of data from Journey North, a Citizen Science Program Ann Entomol Soc Am 108:664–669 Google Scholar
Hutchison, WD, Burkness, EC, Mitchell, PD, Moon, RD, Leslie, TW, Fleischer, SJ, Abrahamson, M, Hamilton, KL, Steffey, KL, Gray, ME, Hellmich, RL, Kaster, LV, Hunt, TE, Wright, RJ, Pecinovsky, K, Rabaey, TL, Flood, BR, Raun, ES (2010) Areawide suppression of European corn borer with Bt maize reaps savings to non-Bt maize growers Science 330:222–225 Google Scholar
Inamine, H, Ellner, SP, Springer, JP, Agrawal, AA (2016) Linking the continental migratory cycle of the monarch butterfly to understand its population decline. Oikos. DOI: 10.1111/oik.03196Google Scholar
Iowa State University (2013) The European Corn Borer Second Generation. http://www.ent.iastate.edu/pest/cornborer/manage/second. Accessed March 17, 2016 Jensen B, Liesch PJ, Nice G, Renz M, Smith D (2015) Pest Management in Wisconsin Field Crops, 2016. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension. 260 pGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N, Vatovec, C (2004) Agroecological benefits from weeds. Pages 137–158 in Inderjit, , ed. Weed Biology and Management. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Google Scholar
Jordan, NR, Zhang, J, Huerd, S (2000) Arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi: potential roles in weed management Weed Res 40:397–410 Google Scholar
Kadrmas, T, Johnson, WS, Eiswerth, M, Coca, M (2003) The Estimated Costs of Treating Invasive Weeds in Elko County, Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Fact Sheet-03-41Google Scholar
Kogan, M (1998) Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments Annu Rev Entomol 43:243–270 Google Scholar
Langpap, C (2006) Conservation of endangered species: can incentives work for private landowners? Ecol Econ 57:558–572 Google Scholar
Lee, JJ (2015) Imperiled Monarch Butterflies Get $3.2 Million From U.S. Government. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/02/150209-monarch-butterfly-milkweed-habitat-conservation-insect-science/. Accessed March 17, 2016Google Scholar
Li, L-Y (1994) Worldwide use of Trichogramma for biological control on different crops: A survey. Pages 37–53 in Wajnberg, E, Hassan, SA, eds. Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. Wallingford, UK: CAB International Google Scholar
Lindquist, JL, Mortensen, DA, Clay, SA, Schmenk, R, Kells, JJ, Howatt, K, Westra, P (1996) Stability of corn (Zea mays)–velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships Weed Sci 44:309–313 Google Scholar
Lindquist, JL, Mortensen, DA, Westra, P, Lambert, WJ, Bauman, TT, Fausey, JC, Kells, JJ, Langton, SJ, Harvey, RG, Bussler, BH, Banken, K, Clay, S, Forcella, F (1999) Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships Weed Sci 47:195–200 Google Scholar
Lingenfelter, D, Curran, WS (2015) Back to the future with non-GMO herbicide programs. Page 300 in Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America. Champaign, IL: WSSA Google Scholar
Losey, JE, Hufbauer, RA, Hartzler, RG (2003) Enumerating Lepidopteran species associated with maize as a first step in risk assessment in the USA Environ Biosafety Res 2:247–261 Google Scholar
Losey, JE, Vaughan, M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects Bioscience 56:311–323 Google Scholar
Loux, MM, Doohan, D, Dobbels, AF, Johnson, WG, Young, BG, Legleiter, TR, Hager, A (2016) Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Extension Pub WS16/Bull 789/IL15. 224 pGoogle Scholar
Lucht, JM (2015) Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops Viruses (Basel) 7:4254–4281 Google Scholar
Lundgren, JG (2009) Nutritional aspects of non-prey foods in the life histories of predaceous Coccinellidae Biol Control 51:294–305 Google Scholar
Mason, CE, Rice, ME, Calvin, DD, Van Duyn, JW, Showers, WB, Hutchison, WD, Witkowski, JF, Higgins, RA, Onstad, DW, Dively, GP (1996) European Corn Borer: Ecology and Management. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, North Central Iowa Regional Extension Pub 327Google Scholar
Mohler, CL, Marschner, CA, Caldwell, BA, DiTommaso, A (2016) Weed mortality caused by row-crop cultivation in organic corn–soybean–spelt cropping systems. Weed Technol. DOI: 0.1614/WT-D-16-00020.1Google Scholar
Monsanto (2015) The Monarch Butterfly Commitment. http://www.monsanto.com/improvingagriculture/pages/monarch-butterfly.aspx. Accessed March 15, 2016Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Egan, JF, Maxwell, BD, Ryan, MR, Smith, RG (2012) Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management Bioscience 62:75–84 Google Scholar
Moyer, J (2011) Organic No-Till Farming. Austin, TX: Acres U.S.A. 204 pGoogle Scholar
Nagarkatti, S, Tobin, PC, Saunders, MC, Muza, AJ (2003) Release of native Trichogramma minutum to control grape berry moth Can Entomol 135:589–598 Google Scholar
Nalewaja, JD (1999) Cultural practices for weed resistance management Weed Technol 13:643–646 Google Scholar
Neeser, C, Dille, JA, Krishnan, G, Mortensen, DA, Rawlinson, JT, Martin, AR, Bills, LB (2004) WeedSOFT®: a weed management decision support system. Weed Sci 52:115–122 Google Scholar
Norris, RF, Kogan, M (2000) Interactions between weeds, arthropod pests, and their natural enemies in managed ecosystems Weed Sci 48:94–158 Google Scholar
Oberhauser, KS, Prysby, MD, Mattila, HR, Stanley-Horn, DE, Sears, MK, Dively, G, Olson, E, Pleasants, JM, Lam, W-KF, Hellmich, RL (2001) Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11913–11918 Google Scholar
Osteen, C, Gottlieb, J, Vasavada, U, eds (2012) Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service EIB-98Google Scholar
Palumbi, SR (2001) Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force Science 293:1786–1790 Google Scholar
Park, MG, Blitzer, EJ, Gibbs, J, Losey, JE, Danforth, BN (2015) Negative effects of pesticides on wild bee communities can be buffered by landscape context. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 282:20150299 Google Scholar
Pleasants, JM (2015) Monarch butterflies and agriculture. Pages 169–178 in Oberhauser, KS, Nail, KR, Altizer, SM, eds. Monarchs in a Changing World: Biology and Conservation of an Iconic Insect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press Google Scholar
Pleasants, JM, Oberhauser, KS (2012) Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: effect on the monarch butterfly population Insect Conserv Divers 6:135–144 Google Scholar
Pleasants, JM, Williams, EH, Brower, LP, Oberhauser, KS, Taylor, OR (2016) Conclusion of no decline in summer monarch population not supported Ann Entomol Soc Am 109:169–171 Google Scholar
Prather, T, DiTomaso, J, Holt, J (2000) Herbicide Resistance: Definition and Management Strategies. Davis, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Pub 8012. 14 pGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Powles, SB (2002) Evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds: initial frequency of target site-based resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Lolium rigidum Heredity 88:8–13 Google Scholar
Pretty, JN, Brett, C, Gee, D, Hine, RE, Mason, CF, Morison, JIL, Raven, H, Rayment, MD, van der Bijl, G (2000) An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture Agric Syst 65:113–136 Google Scholar
Russell, K, Bessin, R (2009) Integration of Trichogramma ostriniae releases and habitat modification for suppression of European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner) in bell peppers Renew Agric Food Syst 24:19–24 Google Scholar
Ryan, MR, Mortensen, DA, Seidel, R, Smith, RG, Grantham, AM (2009) Weed community response to no-tillage practices in organic and conventional corn. Proc Northeast Weed Sci Soc 63:94 Google Scholar
Ryan, MR, Smith, RG, Mirsky, SB, Mortensen, DA, Seidel, R (2010) Management filters and species traits: weed community assembly in long-term organic and conventional systems Weed Sci 58:265–277 Google Scholar
Sarajlić, A, Raspudi, E, Maji, I, Ivezi, M, Brme, M, Josipovi, M (2014) Efficacy of natural population of Trichogramma wasps against European corn borer in field maize Poljoprivreda 20:18–22 Google Scholar
SAS (2012) JMP Statistical Software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc Google Scholar
Semmens, BX, Semmens, DJ, Thogmartin, WE, Wiederholt, R, López-Hoffman, L, Diffendorfer, JE, Pleasants, JM, Oberhauser, KS, Taylor, OR (2016) Quasi-extinction risk and population targets for the eastern, migratory population of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). Sci Rep 6:23265 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, Lindenmeyer, RB, Ostlie, MH (2012) What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? Pest Manag Sci 68:3–9 Google Scholar
Shelton, AM Zhao, J-Z, Roush, RT (2002) Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants Annu Rev Entomol 47:845–881 Google Scholar
Siegfried, BD, Hellmich, RL (2012) Understanding successful resistance management GM Crops Food 3:184–193 Google Scholar
Smith, EA, DiTommaso, A, Fuchs, M, Shelton, AM, Nault, BA (2011) Weed hosts for onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and their potential role in the epidemiology of iris yellow spot virus in an onion ecosystem Environ Entomol 40:194–203 Google Scholar
Smith, RA, Mooney, KA, Agrawal, AA (2008) Coexistence of three specialist aphids on common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca Ecology 89:2187–2196 Google Scholar
Smith, SM (1996) Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use Annu Rev Entomol 41:375–406 Google Scholar
Srinivasan, R, Alvarez, JM, Bosque-Pérez, NA, Eigenbrode, SD, Novy, RG (2008) Effect of an alternate weed host, hairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides, on the biology of the two most important potato leafroll virus (Luteoviridae: Polerovirus) vectors, Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Aphididae: Homoptera) Environ Entomol 37:592–600 Google Scholar
State Symbols, USA (2016) List of State Insects. http://www.statesymbolsusa.org/categories/insect. Accessed March 17, 2016Google Scholar
Stephens, EJ, Losey, JE, Allee, LL, DiTommaso, A, Bodner, C, Breyre, A (2012) The impact of Cry3Bb Bt-maize on two guilds of beneficial beetles Agric Ecosyst Environ 156:72–81 Google Scholar
Stern, VM, Smith, RF, van den Bosch, R, Hagen, KS (1959) The integration of chemical and biological control of the spotted alfalfa aphid: the integrated control concept Hilgardia 29:81–101 Google Scholar
Sturz, AV, Matheson, BG, Arsenault, W, Kimpinski, J, Christie, BR (2001) Weeds as a source of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural soils Can J Microbiol 47:1013–1024 Google Scholar
Taleb, NN (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House. 366 pGoogle Scholar
Timmons, FL (1970) A history of weed control in the United States and Canada Weed Sci 18:294–307 Google Scholar
Treacy, MF, Benedict, JH, Walmsley, MH, Lopez, JD, Morrison, RK (1987) Parasitism of bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs on nectaried and nectariless cotton Environ Entomol 16:420–423 Google Scholar
[USDA, APHIS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2015) Monsanto Co.; determination of nonregulated status of herbicide resistant soybean and cotton. Fed Regist 80:2675–2676 Google Scholar
[USDA NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (2015) Acreage. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1000. Accessed March 17, 2016Google Scholar
[USDA NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (2016) http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/Acre/Acre-06-30-2016.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2016Google Scholar
[USDA NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service (2015) The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov/index.html. Accessed February 25, 2015Google Scholar
[USDI] U.S. Department of the Interior (2014) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90-day findings on two petitions Fed Regist 79:78775–78778 (to be codified at 50 CFR pt. 17)Google Scholar
[USDI] U.S. Department of the Interior (2015) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding on a petition to list greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as an endangered or threatened species Fed Regist 80:59858–59942 (to be codified at 50 CFR pt. 17)Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Soteres, JK, Mallory-Smith, C, Burgos, NR, Johnson, WG, McClelland, MR (2012) Herbicide resistance: towards an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops Weed Sci 60(special issue):2–30 Google Scholar
Warwick, SI, Black, LD (1988) The biology of Canadian weeds, 90: Abutilon theophrasti Can J Plant Sci 68:1069–1085 Google Scholar
Waterfield, G, Zilberman, D (2012) Pest management in food systems: An economic perspective Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:223–245 Google Scholar
Westerman, PR, Liebman, M, Menalled, FD, Heggenstaller, AH, Hartzler, RG, Dixon, PM (2005) Are many little hammers effective? velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics in two- and four-year crop rotation systems Weed Sci 53:382–392 Google Scholar
Wilson, RS, Tucker, MA, Hooker, NH, LeJeune, JT, Doohan, D (2008) Perceptions and beliefs about weed management: perspectives of Ohio grain and produce farmers Weed Technol 22:339–350 Google Scholar
World Wildlife Fund (2016) Survey Suggests Migratory Monarchs Are Rebounding—With a Long Road Ahead. https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/survey-suggests-migratory-monarchs-are-rebounding-with-a-long-road-ahead. Accessed June 2, 2016Google Scholar
Wressell, HB (1973) The role of parasites in the control of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in southwestern Ontario Can Entomol 105:553–557 Google Scholar
Yarrow, G (2009) Rules, Regulations and Laws Affecting Wildlife Management. Clemson, SC: Clemson Extension Fact Sheet 26. 8 pGoogle Scholar
Yenish, JP, Durgan, BR, Miller, DW, Wyse, DL (1997a) Wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield reduction from common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) competition Weed Sci 45:127–131 Google Scholar
Yenish, JP, Fry, TA, Durgan, BR, Wyse, DL (1996) Tillage effects on seed distribution and common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) establishment Weed Sci 44:815–820 Google Scholar
Yenish, JP, Fry, TA, Durgan, BR Wyse, DL (1997b) Establishment of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in corn, soybean, and wheat Weed Sci 45:44–53 Google Scholar
Zandstra, BH, Motooka, PS (1978) Beneficial effects of weeds in pest management—a review PANS Pest Artic News Summ 24:333–338 Google Scholar
Zhang, F, Baberdreier, D, Wang, Z-Y, Il, KS, Zhang, L, Pyon, YC, Bai, S-X, Song, K, Ri, JO, Grossrieder, M, Kuhlmann, U (2010) Mass releases of Trichogramma ostriniae increase maize production in DPR Korea J Appl Entomol 134:481–490 Google Scholar
Zimdahl, RL (2004) Weed–Crop Competition: A Review. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 220 pGoogle Scholar
Ziska, LH, Dukes, JS (2010) Benefits from weeds. Pages 181–197 in Weed Biology and Climate Change. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Google Scholar