Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:37:16.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of Molinate use with Water Management for Red Rice (Oryza sativa) Control in Water-seeded Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John B. Baker ,
Earl A. Sonnier  and
James W. Shrefler
John B. Baker
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Earl A. Sonnier
Affiliation:
Louisiana Rice Res. Stn., P.O. Box 1429, Crowley, LA 70527-1429
James W. Shrefler
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Integration of preplant-incorporated molinate (S-ethyl hexahydro-1H-azepine-1-carbothioate) at 4.5 kg ai/ha and a brief postseeding drainage period in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) gave the best red rice (Oryza sativa L. # ORYSA) control without a significant reduction in cultivar stand density. This combination of practices provided higher cultivar grain yield and lower red rice grain yield than any water management practice alone. Continuous-flood water management provided a substantial reduction in red rice stand density, but it also caused a significant reduction in the cultivar stand density. Under the reduced stand density conditions, the red rice was very competitive and yielded more than the cultivar. Although brief drainage alone gave a significantly lower level of red rice control, it had no significant effect on the cultivar stand density, and the red rice and cultivar yields were not significantly different from the continuous-flood yields. Prolonged drainage had the highest red rice and cultivar stand densities and the highest red rice grain yield, but the cultivar yield was not significantly different from the other plots that were not treated with herbicide. Although this treatment gave the highest total grain yield, its composition had the highest percentage of red rice. Puddling the seedbed did not alter the stands or yields of red rice or cultivar compared to the nonpuddled plots with the same water management and herbicide rate. The application of molinate as a preplant-incorporated treatment or as a preplant postflood treatment before or after puddling gave results that were not significantly different from each other. The superior performance of preplant application of molinate in water-seeded rice in conjunction with a brief postseeding drainage period provides an excellent tool for red rice suppresion.

Keywords

Weed controlherbicidesmethods of applicationflooding drainagestand densitypanicle densitypanicle sizeseed productionORYSA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , November 1986 , pp. 916 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cohn, M. A., Hughes, J., and Butera, D. 1984. Dormancy and viability of red rice during maturation and storage. (Abstr.) Plant Physiol. S-75:68.Google Scholar
2. Craigmiles, J. P. 1978. Introduction. Pages 5–6 in Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice: Research and Control. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-1270.Google Scholar
3. Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 33: 644–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dodson, W. R. 1898. Red rice. Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 50:206–226.Google Scholar
5. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology in plants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, T. H. and Miller, M. D. 1973. Culture. Pages 88–134 in Rice in the United States: Varieties and Production. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 289.Google Scholar
7. Jennings, P. R. and Aquino, R. C. 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanisms of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22:529–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Jones, D. B., Peterson, M. L., and Geng, S. 1979. Association between grain filling rate and duration and yield components in rice. Crop Sci. 19:641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Matsushima, S. 1966. Crop science in rice. Fuji Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
10. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa L.) in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 29:663–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Sonnier, E. A. 1978. Cultural control of red rice. Pages 10–15 in Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice: Research and Control. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-1270.Google Scholar
12. USDA. 1977. United States standards for rough rice, brown rice for processing, milled rice. USDA Federal Grain Inspection Services, Inspection Div., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
13. Williams, R. T. 1956. Weeds in rice. The Rice J. 59(2):8.Google Scholar
14. Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. The Int. Rice Res. Inst., Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar