Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:12:24.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interacting Effects of Imidazolinone Herbicide Mixtures on Translocation in Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw ,
Dennis G. Riley  and
Bradford W. Minton
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Dennis G. Riley
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Bradford W. Minton
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individual herbicides and all double combinations of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and imazapyr were applied alone and in combination to the foliage of pitted morningglory plants in order to evaluate potential influences on translocation. Unlabeled imazethapyr at 5.62 μg plant−1 stimulated basipetal translocation of both 14C-imazaquin and 14C–imazapyr. Unlabeled imazaquin at 7.49 μg plant−1 also increased basipetal translocation of 14C–imazethapyr but did not influence 14C–imazapyr translocation. No combination affected the amount of 14C herbicide remaining in treated leaves or moving into foliage above treated leaves. Unlabeled imazapyr at 0.11 μg plant−1 did not affect movement of either imazaquin or imazethapyr.

Keywords

Imazapyr, (±)–2–[4,5–dihydro–4–methyl–4–(1–methylethyl)–5–oxo–1H–imidazol–2–yl]–3–pyridinecarboxylic acidimazaquin, 2–[4,5–dihydro–4–methyl–4–(1–methylethyl)–5–oxo–1H–imidazol–2–yl]–3–quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, (±)–2–[4,5–dihydro–4–methyl–4–(1–methylethyl)–5–oxo–1H–imidazol–2–yl]–5–ethyl–pyridinecarboxylic acidpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAImazapyrimazaquinimazethapyrIPOLA
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 540 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bloodworm, L. H. and Shaw, D. R. 1987. Morningglory control in a wheat-soybean double crop system. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:41.Google Scholar
2. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
3. Harrison, M. P., Rhodes, G. N. Jr., Krueger, W. A., and Hayes, R. M. 1989. Activity of imazethapyr in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:57.Google Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R. and Anion, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Circ. No. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
5. King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Reduced preemergence herbicide rates in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:29.Google Scholar
6. King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1989. Timing of postemergence imazethapyr (Pursuit) applications. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:58.Google Scholar
7. Nandihalli, U. B. and Bendixen, L. E. 1988. Absorption, translocation, and toxicity of foliar-applied imazaquin in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 36:313–317.Google Scholar
8. Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1988. Influence of imazapyr on the control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 36:663–666.Google Scholar
9. Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) control with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 3:95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinones—potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.Google Scholar
11. Shaner, D. L. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252 214 in soybeans (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 33:469–471.Google Scholar
12. Van Ellis, M. R. and Shaner, D. L. 1988. Mechanism of cellular absorption of imidazolinones in soybean (Glycine max) leaf discs. Pestic. Sci. 23:25–34.Google Scholar
13. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., and Cole, T. A. 1988. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied imazaquin in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and associated weeds. Weed Sci. 36:5–8.Google Scholar
14. Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1987. Influence of inorganic salts and imazapyr on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 1:328–331.Google Scholar