Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:14:59.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Starke
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted on eight weed species to determine if chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, or sulfentrazone at two rates (labeled and one-half the labeled rate) were complementary tank mixtures with glyphosate at 210 and 420 g ai ha−1. Laboratory experiments were conducted on barnyardgrass, pitted morningglory, Palmer amaranth, and velvetleaf using radiolabeled glyphosate, chlorimuron, and imazethapyr to determine the absorption and translocation pattern of these herbicides applied alone and in combination. In the field, glyphosate plus chlorimuron tank mixtures were generally additive. Adding chlorimuron did not decrease absorption or translocation of 14C-glyphosate by barnyardgrass, pitted morningglory, or velvetleaf. Adding glyphosate increased absorption of 14C-chlorimuron by Palmer amaranth and velvetleaf. All four fomesafen plus glyphosate rate combinations were antagonistic to goosegrass, sicklepod, Palmer amaranth, and velvetleaf, and three of the four were antagonistic to barnyardgrass and entireleaf morningglory. Fomesafen decreased absorption and translocation of 14C-glyphosate in barnyardgrass, pitted morningglory, and velvetleaf. Ninety percent of glyphosate plus imazethapyr combinations were additive or synergistic, with all rate combinations synergistic for pitted morningglory. Adding glyphosate to imazethapyr increased absorption of 14C-imazethapyr by Palmer amaranth and velvetleaf. Glyphosate plus sulfentrazone tank mixtures were antagonistic at all rate combinations for barnyardgrass and Palmer amaranth and at three of the four combinations for goosegrass and entireleaf morningglory, indicating that these herbicides are not complementary in tank mixtures.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Appleby, A. P. and Somabhi, M. 1978. Antagonistic effect of atrazine and simazine on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 26: 135139.Google Scholar
Ballard, T. O., Foley, M. E., and Bauman, T. T. 1995. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of imazethapyr in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) . Weed Sci. 43: 572577.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. 1993. Interactions of herbicides and other agrochemicals in plants: interactions in mixtures with other herbicides and with safe-ners, fungicides, insecticides and nematicides. Pages 113132 in Altman, J., ed. Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15: 2022.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Green, H. M., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Postemergence activity of sulfentrazone: effects of surfactants and leaf surfaces. Weed Sci. 44: 797803.Google Scholar
Doss, L. G. and York, A. C. 1995. Roundup Ready soybean response to glyphosate and ALS inhibitor combinations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 4546.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Bailey, S. P. 1988. Herbicide interactions with herbicides and other chemicals. Pages 3761 in McWhorter, C. G. and Gephardt, M. R., eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides and Other Agricultural Chemicals. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D. 1985. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Boston: Butterworths, pp. 34, 231–235.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R., Gossett, B. J., Murphy, T. R., and Toler, J. E. 1991. Response of broadleaf weeds and soybeans to the diphenyl ether herbicides. J. Prod. Agric. 4: 407410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1: 163.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1938. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Univ. Calif. Agric. Res. Sta. Circ. 347: 139.Google Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8: 129133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354362.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G. R., Krausz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean tolerance and summer annual weed control with glufosinate and glyphosate in resistant soybeans. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49: 120.Google Scholar
Kitchen, L. M., Hook, B. J., and Godley, J. L. 1984. A comparison of soybean overtop broadleaf herbicides in Louisiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37: 7778.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E., King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity. Weed Sci. 40: 227232.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F. and Kapusta, G. 1994. Annual weed control with glyphosate at several rates, weed sizes, and spray volumes. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49: 120121.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. K. and Griffin, J. L. 1994. Comparison of herbicide programs and cultivation for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max) . Weed Technol. 8: 7782.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Taylor, S. E., and Gander, J. R. 1996. Influence of application timing and rate of glyphosate on weed control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 57.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980. Interaction between glyphosate and various herbicides for broadleaved control. Weed Res. 20: 255260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, W. and Crabtree, G. 1986. Absorption, translocation, and toxicity of glyphosate and oxyfluorfen in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) . Weed Sci. 34: 923929.Google Scholar
Selleck, G. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29: 185190.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P., Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1978. Separation of glyphosate and possible metabolites by thin-layer chromatography. Weed Sci. 26: 673674.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., Jordan, D. L., and Miller, D. K. 1997. Postemergence weed control in soybeans using glyphosate and chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 175.Google Scholar
Wells, B. H. and Appleby, A. P. 1992. Lactofen increases glyphosate-simulated shikimate production in little mallow (Malva parviflora) . Weed Sci. 40: 171173.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, V. T. 1989. Absorption and translocation of foliar applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37: 175180.Google Scholar
Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24: 557566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandstra, B. H. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1977. Movement and activity of glyphosate in purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 25: 268274.Google Scholar