Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:20:10.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Julie M. Lich ,
Karen A. Renner  and
Donald Penner
Julie M. Lich
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to evaluate the potential for antagonistic or synergistic interactions from tank mixtures of glyphosate plus a selective herbicide applied postemergence. In the greenhouse, glyphosate at 420 g ae ha−1 plus 28% liquid urea-ammonium nitrate (28% UAN) provided at least 89% control of common lambsquarters and common ragweed. Glyphosate at 1,680 g ha−1 plus 28% UAN provided less than 81% control of velvetleaf and less than 75% control of ivyleaf morningglory. Tank mixing bentazon at 1,120 g ai ha−1 with glyphosate at 420 g ha−1 synergistically increased control of velvetleaf. Tank mixtures of glyphosate plus a selective herbicide were predominately additive in control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and velvetleaf. Several tank mix combinations of chlorimuron or imazethapyr plus glyphosate plus 28% UAN were antagonistic in control of ivyleaf morningglory. In the field, glyphosate at 840 g ha−1 plus 28% UAN provided at least 88% control of common lambsquarters and velvetleaf in 1994. However, glyphosate at 840 g ha−1 plus 28% UAN provided only 60% control of velvetleaf in 1995. Tank-mixing bentazon or CGA-248757 with glyphosate at 420 g ha−1 increased velvetleaf and common lambsquarters control in 1995. In general, adding chlorimuron, imazethapyr, or thifensulfuron to glyphosate plus 28% UAN did not increase control of common lambsquarters or velvetleaf. Tank mixing imazethapyr with glyphosate plus 28% UAN antagonized velvetleaf control in 1994 and in 1995. The tank mixture of thifensulfuron at 2 g ha−1 plus glyphosate at 420 g ha−1 plus 28% UAN increased soybean injury in the field in 1994. However, tank mixing chlorimuron, imazethapyr, or thifensulfuron with glyphosate plus 28% UAN did not increase soybean injury in the greenhouse or in the field in 1995.

Keywords

AntagonismbentazonchlorimuronflumicloracimazethapyrsynergismthifensulfuronABUTHAMBELCHEALIPOHEBentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidechlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]benzoicacidflumiclorac, [2-chloro-4-fluoro-5-(1,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-isoind ol-2-yl)phenoxy]acetic acidglyphosate,N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-enhyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AM BELivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHEvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ABUTHsoybean Glycine max (L.) Merr.
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 12 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1992. Resource Herbicide Technical Information Bulletin. Walnut Creek, CA: Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 12 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1995. Action Herbicide Technical Information Bulletin. Greensboro, NC: Ciba Crop Protection. 4 p.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Somabhi, M. 1978. Antagonistic effect of atrazine and simazine on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 26: 135–139.Google Scholar
Bocion, P. 1986. Synergistic herbicidal compositions containing glyphosate. European Patent EP 234, 379, 31 p.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1988. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3: 596–601.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15: 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35: 1461–1467.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Hurst, H. R., and Austin, D. F. 1990. Biology and control of morningglories (Ipomoea spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 5: 83–114.Google Scholar
Gerwick, B. C., Thompson, P., and Noveroske, R. 1988. Potential mechanisms in antagonism with aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28: 100.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1: 1–73.Google Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of nonselective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8: 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G., Krausz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean tolerance and summer annual weed control with glufosinate and glyphosate in resistant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 120.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. K. and Matysiak, R. 1991. Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39: 622–628.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980. Interaction between glyphosate and various herbicides for broadleaved weed control. Weed Res. 20: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecinovsky, K. T., Owen, M.D.K., and Lux, J. F. 1992. Glyphosate applications with various additives for quackgrass [Elytrigia repens (L.)] and annual weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 47: 23.Google Scholar
Pereira, W. and Crabtree, G. 1986. Absorption, translocation, and toxicity of glyphosate and oxyfluorfen in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34: 923–929.Google Scholar
Peters, R. A., Dest, W. M., and Triolo, A. C. 1974. Preliminary report on the effect of mixing liquid fertilizers and residual herbicides with paraquat and glyphosate. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 28: 35–40.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Jackson, E. P., and Penner, D. 1995. The basis for the hardwater antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 43: 541–548.Google Scholar
VanLieshout, L. A. and Loux, M. M. 1994. Interaction of glyphosate with preemergence soybean herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 49: 119.Google Scholar
Wells, B. H. and Appleby, A. P. 1992. Lactofen increases glyphosate-stimulated shikimate production in little mallow (Malva parviflora). Weed Sci. 40: 171–173.Google Scholar
Wells, B. H., Bradshaw, L. D., and Padgette, S. R. 1994. Perspectives on the potential of the development of glyphosate-resistant weeds. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 49: 130.Google Scholar
White, M. D., Bauman, T. T., Vidal, R. A., and Lambert, W. J. 1994. Weed management in soybeans with glyphosate and glufosinate applied postemergence. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 49: 53.Google Scholar
Whitwell, T., Banks, P., Basler, E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1980. Glyphosate absorption and translocation in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and activity in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense). Weed Sci. 28: 93–96.Google Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar