Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:28:07.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference between Rottboellia cochinchinensis and Zea mays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald E. Strahan ,
James L. Griffin ,
Daniel B. Reynolds  and
Donnie K. Miller
Ronald E. Strahan
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Box 9555, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Donnie K. Miller
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies conducted over 2 yr in Louisiana determined critical periods of Rottboellia cochinchinensis interference in Zea mays. In a duration of interference study, R. cochinchinensis was allowed to compete with Z. mays for 0 (weed-free, season-long), 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 (weedy, season-long) wk, after which plots were maintained weed-free for the rest of the growing season. Rottboellia cochinchinensis biomass at time of initial removal increased linearly as weeks of interference increased. For 2 wk of interference, R. cochinchinensis biomass was greater in 1993 than 1994, but for 4 wk or more of interference, biomass was greater the second year indicating environmental conditions were more conducive to R. cochinchinensis growth in 1994. Season-long R. cochinchinensis interference reduced Z. mays height by 18% compared with the weed-free check. For both years, R. cochinchinensis reduced yields 125 kg ha−1 for each week of interference. In weed-free maintenance studies, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 (weed-free, season-long) wk of weed-free conditions were provided, after which R. cochinchinensis was allowed to repopulate. Zea mays yield was equivalent for the weed-free control and plots maintained free of R. cochinchinensis for 2 wk or more. In the interference studies, season-long R. cochinchinensis interference reduced Z. mays yield at least 33% compared with the season-long weed-free check.

Keywords

Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W. Clayton ROOEX, itchgrassZea mays L. DeKalb 689, corn.Competitioncrop–weed interactionduration of interferenceFederal noxious weedweed-free maintenance
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 205 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aison, S., Johnson, M. K., and Harger, T. R. 1984. Role of birds in dispersal of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata (L.) L. f.) seeds in the southeastern U.S.A. Proc. Ecol. 6:307–313.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Louisiana's Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide for 1998. Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Pub. 1565. 183 p.Google Scholar
Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Non-competitive effects of giant foxtail in the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64:322–325.Google Scholar
Bridgemohan, P., McDavid, C. R., Berkele, I., and Brathwaite, R.A.I. 1992. The effects of Rottboellia cochinchinensis on the growth, development and yield of maize. Trop. Pest Manag. 38:400–404.Google Scholar
Duncan, N. 1983. Itchgrass: predicting its potential range. Agric. Res. 32:13.Google Scholar
Elakkad, M. A. 1983. Enviromental stresses induced by natural weed infestations and their effects on corn and soybeans. . University of Minnesota. 159 p.Google Scholar
El-Shafey, Y. H., El-Hattab, H., and Monged, N. O. 1975. N P K contents of maize plant and associated weeds as affected by nitrogen levels. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 45:316–320.Google Scholar
Freshwater, I. T., Benson, A. J., and Hall, T. F. 1986. Itchgrass Rottboellia cochinchinensis—Burdekin infestation and legislative control program. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 155–160.Google Scholar
Harger, T. R., Shrefler, J. W., Millhollon, E. P., and La Frankie, J. V. 1980. Germination of Rottboellia exaltata under laboratory and field conditions. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:256.Google Scholar
Harger, T. R., Vidrine, P. R., and Nester, P. R. 1982. Control and management of itchgrass. La. Agric. 25 (4): 20–21, 24.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, A. S. 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. USDA Miscellaneous Publ. 200. 1051 pp.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The Worlds Worst Weeds, Distribution, and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Black, H. L. 1985. R. cochinchinensis found in Arkansas. Ark. Farm Res. 34:5.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybean. Weeds. 13:331–334.Google Scholar
Kropff, M. J., Vossen, F.J.H., Spitters, C.J.T., and De Groot, W. 1984. Competition between a maize crop and a natural population of (Echinochloa crus-galli L.). Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 32:324–327.Google Scholar
LeJeune, K. R., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., and Saxton, D. B. 1994. Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) interference in soybean. Weed Technol. 8:733–737.Google Scholar
Lencse, R. J. and Griffin, J. L. 1991. Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) interference in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Weed Technol. 5:396–399.Google Scholar
Mercado, B. L. 1976. Some properties of the inhibitor from Rottboellia exaltata L. f. seed. Philipp. Weed Sci. Bull. 3:40–45.Google Scholar
Mercado, B. L. 1978. Biology, Problems, and Control of Rottboellia exaltata L. f. A Monograph. Biotropical Bull. 14.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1965. Growth characteristics and control of Rottboellia exaltata L. f., a new weed in sugarcane. Sugar Bull. 44 (5): 82–88.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1975. Weed watch. Weeds Today 6 (4): 20.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1980. Itchgrass—a weed of world-wide concern. Sugar J. 43:16.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R. and Buchanan, G. A. 1986. Weed competition economic thresholds. Pages 71–97 In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Pamplona, P. P. and Mercado, B. L. 1982. Ecotypes of Rottboellia exaltata L. f. in the Philippines: III. Competitive relationships with corn (Zea mays L.). Philipp. Agric. 65:395–402.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1979. The effects of shading on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata). Weed Sci. 27:549–553.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T., Meyer, C. R., Flint, E. D., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1979. Temperature responses and potential distribution of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in United States. Weed Sci. 27:77–82.Google Scholar
Perry, K. M., Evans, R., and Jeffrey, L. S. 1983. Competition between johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and corn (Zea mays). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:345.Google Scholar
Richards, P.V.M. and Thomas, P.E.L. 1970. An approach to the control of Rottboellia exaltata in maize. Pages 689–696 in Proceedings of the 10th British Weed Control Conference.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. and Zelaya, O. 1986. Competition and control of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in maize (Zea mays). Trop. Pest Manag. 32:101–104.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.E.L. and Allison, J.S.C. 1975. Competition between maize and Rottboellia exaltata . J. Agric. Sci. 84:302–305.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. and Westra, P. 1991. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) interference in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Sci. 39:217–220.Google Scholar
Zanin, G., Cantele, A., and Toniolo, L. 1986. Growth analysis parameters for studying weed competition in maize. Pages 153–160 In European Weed Research Society Symposium on Economic Weed Control. European Weed Research Society.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-Crop Competition, A Review. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University International Plant Protection Center. 195 p.Google Scholar