Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:44:27.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isoxadifen-Ethyl Derivatives Protect Rice from Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl–associated Injury during the Control of Weedy Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2017

Changchao Shen ,
Wenwei Tang ,
Dongqiang Zeng ,
Hongle Xu ,
Wangcang Su  and
Renhai Wu
Changchao Shen
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Associate, Research Associate, and Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China
Wenwei Tang
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Professor, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530005, China
Dongqiang Zeng
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Professor, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530005, China
Hongle Xu
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Associate, Research Associate, and Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China
Wangcang Su
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Associate, Research Associate, and Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China
Renhai Wu*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Associate, Research Associate, and Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China
*
Corresponding author’s E-mail: renhai.wu@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, a phenoxy herbicide of the aryloxy–phenoxy–propionic acid group, had a strong control effect when applied POST to weedy rice in this study, with the effective concentrations of 294 μM and 218 μM of herbicide causing 50% inhibition (IC50) in plant height and fresh weight values, respectively. However, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl caused phytotoxicity in cultivated rice. Isoxadifen-ethyl, a widely used herbicide safener in rice, can decrease the phytotoxicity caused by fenoxaprop-P-ethyl. Owing to the extremely similar morphological features and physiological properties of weedy and cultivated rice, it is not practical to spray isoxadifen-ethyl directly on cultivated rice plants to safen them. Applying the safener directly to cultivated rice seeds may be a practical alternative method. To improve the biological activity of isoxadifen-ethyl seed treatments, novel compounds were designed by splicing other groups, including amines, amino acids, and 2- methoxy-5-nitrophenol sodium salt, to the parental structure of isoxadifen-ethyl. Through hydrolysis, acyl chlorination, acyl amination, and esterification, a series of isoxadifen-ethyl derivatives were synthesized and their structures were determined by mass spectrometry and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The biological activities of five of the isoxadifen-ethyl derivatives, which possessed recovery effects similar to isoxadifen-ethyl, were able to relieve herbicide phytotoxicity. In pot experiments, isoxadifen-ethyl showed almost no activity as a seed treatment, while three derivative compounds, when used independently as seed treatments, were able to prevent the damage caused by fenoxaprop-P-ethyl. The results will help to develop a new control method for weedy rice, thereby decreasing production costs and increasing farmers’ incomes.

Keywords

Fenoxaprop-P-ethylisoxadifen-ethylrice, Oryza sativa L.Isoxadifen-ethyl derivativesseed treatmentsynthesisweedy rice.

Information

Type
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 65 , Issue 5 , September 2017 , pp. 579 - 587
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Franck E. Dayan, Colorado State University

References

Literature Cited

Andres, A, Fogliatto, S, Ferrero, A, Vidotto, F (2015) Growth variability of Italian weedy rice populations grown with or without cultivated rice. Crop Sci 55:394–402 Google Scholar
Azmi, M, Abdullah, MZ (1998). A manual for the identification and control of padi angin (weedy rice) in Malaysia. Serdang (Malaysia): MARDI Publication. 18 pGoogle Scholar
Baek, JS, Chung, NJ, Chung, (2012) Seed wintering and deterioration characteristics between weedy and cultivated rice. Rice 5:1–10 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baki, BB, Chin, DV, Mortimer, M, eds (2000). Wild and Weedy Rice in Rice Ecosystems in Asia—A Review. Limited Proceedings No. 2. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 124 pGoogle Scholar
Buehring, NW, Talbert, RE, Baldwin, FL (2006) Rice (Oryza sativa) response and annual grass control with graminicides. Weed Technol 20:738–744 Google Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2008) Red rice (Oryza sativa) status after 5 years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busi, R, Nguyen, NK, Chauhan, BS, Vidotto, F, Tabacchi, M, Powles, SB (2016) Can herbicide safeners allow selective control of weedy rice infesting rice crops? Pest Manag Sci 73:71–77 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS (2013) Strategies to manage weedy rice in Asia. Crop Prot 48:51–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chèvre, AM, Eber, F, Baranger, A (1997) Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature 389:924–924 Google Scholar
Chèvre, AM, Eber, F, Darmency, H (2000) Assessment of interspecific hybridization between transgenic oilseed rape and wild radish under normal agronomic conditions. Theor Appl Genet 100:1233–1239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, DV (2001) Biology and management of barnyardgrass, red sprangletop and weedy rice. Weed Biol Manag 1:37–41 Google Scholar
Delouche, JC, Labrada, R (2007). Weedy Rices: Origin, Biology, Ecology and Control Volume 188. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 144 pGoogle Scholar
Deng, F, Hatzios, KK (2002) Characterization and safener induction of multiple glutathione S-transferases in three genetic lines of rice. Pestic Biochem and Phys 72:24–39 Google Scholar
Ferrero, A (2003) Weedy rice, biological features and control. Pages 89–107 in Labrada R ed., Weed Management for Developing Countries. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Google Scholar
Guo, ZY, Huang, F, Xu, Z (2008) Residue dynamics of 10% fenoxaprop-P-ethyl + cyhalofop-butyl EC in rice. J Ecol Rural Environ 24:51–54 Google Scholar
Hamada, M, Dobashi, A (2002) Chiral separation by electrokinetic capillary chromatography using newly synthesized linear polymers containing L-amino acid moieties. Anal Sci 18:83–88 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinga, M, Griffin, S, Moon, MS (2016a) Methods and compositions to produce rice resistant to ACCase inhibitors. U.S. Patent 9,370,149Google Scholar
Hinga, M, Moon, MS, Channarayappa, VR (2016b) Rice resistant to HPPD and ACCase inhibiting herbicides. U.S. Patent 9,303,270Google Scholar
Lucini, L, Molinari, GP (2010) Residues of the herbicide fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, its agronomic safener isoxadifen-ethyl and their metabolites in rice after field application. Pest Manag Sci 66:621–626 Google Scholar
Lucini, L, Molinari, GP (2011) Detection of the herbicide fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, its agronomic safener isoxadifen ethyl and their metabolites residue in rice. Qual Assur Saf Crops 3:63–68 Google Scholar
McMullan, PM (2006) The influence of temperature on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) tolerance to diclofop-methyl or fenoxaprop-P-ethyl mixtures. Weed Res 34:23–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisha, C, Chopra, NK (2005) Bioefficacy of fenoxaprop, clodinafop, metribuzin alone and in combination against weeds in wheat and their residual effect on succeeding crops. Ind J Weed Sci 37:163–166 Google Scholar
Pornprom, T, Mahatamnuchoke, P, Usui, K (2006) The role of altered acetyl-CoA carboxylase in conferring resistance to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees). Pest Manag Sci 62:1109–1115 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, CN, Reddy, MD, Devi, MP (2000) Evaluation of fenoxyprop-P-ethyl and ethoxysulfuron in transplanted rice. Ind J Weed Sci 32:105–107 Google Scholar
Saini, JP, Angiras, NN (2002) Evaluation of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl for weed control in direct seeded puddled rice. Ind J Weed Sci 34:131–133 Google Scholar
Sales, MA, Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK (2011) Morphological and physiological responses of weedy red rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cultivated rice (O. sativa) to N supply. Am J Plant Sci 2:569–577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankula, S, Braverman, MP, Oard, JH (1998) Genetic analysis of glufosinate resistance in crosses between transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 12:209–214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, W, Köcher, H (2009) Tembotrione and combination partner isoxadifen-ethyl—mode of herbicidal action. Bayer CropScience J 62:35–52 Google Scholar
Sheng, GS, Vila-Aiub, MM, Busi, R (2015) Glyphosate resistance in Echinochloa colona: phenotypic characterization and quantification of selection intensity. Pest Manag Sci 72:67–73 Google Scholar
Singh, VP, Singh, G, Singh, M (2004) Effect of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl on transplanted rice and associated weeds. Ind J Weed Sci 36:190–192 Google Scholar
Sun, J, Qian, Q, Ma, DR (2013) Introgression and selection shaping the genome and adaptive loci of weedy rice in northern China. New Phytol 197:290–299 Google Scholar
Yang, C, Dong, L, Li, J (2007) Identification of Japanese foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus) resistant to haloxyfop using three different assay techniques. Weed Sci 55:537–540 Google Scholar
Zhao, LX, Ying, F, Shuang, G (2014) Protective responses induced by 3-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine safeners in maize (Zea mays). Int J Agric. Biol 16:1204–1208 Google Scholar
Ziska, LH, Gealy, DR, Burgos, N (2015) Weedy (red) rice: an emerging constraint to global rice production. Adv Agron 129:181–218 Google Scholar