Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:51:30.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isozyme Variation in Broom Snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Yanglin Hou  and
Tracy M. Sterling
Yanglin Hou
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol., Plant Pathol. and Weed Sci., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003
Tracy M. Sterling
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol., Plant Pathol. and Weed Sci., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Broom snakeweed, a perennial rangeland shrub, is highly variable morphologically and can grow under a broad range of environmental conditions. In this study, isozyme analysis using starch gel electrophoresis was used to quantify genetic variability within and among New Mexico populations of broom snakeweed. Eight separate populations of broom snakeweed and one population of threadleaf snakeweed as a comparison were investigated. of the 10 enzyme systems examined, 16 loci were identified in eight populations and two species. Eleven loci were monomorphic in eight populations and two species and five loci were polymorphic in at least one population or species. Genetic variability was large in broom and threadleaf snakeweed populations as determined by isozyme analysis. Genetic variability among broom snakeweed populations was greater than that within populations for the five polymorphic loci. Cluster analysis of genetic distance and identity for the eight populations and two species characterized two major groups. Within broom snakeweed, cluster analysis characterized five groups. The two species shared most common alleles. The genetic variation identified in this research may account for the morphological differences and broad geographical distribution of broom snakeweed.

Keywords

Broom snakeweed, Gutierrezia sarothrae (Pursh) Britt. & Rusby #3 GUESAthreadleaf snakeweed, Gutierrezia microcephala (DC.) Gray # GUEMIG. microcephalagenetic variabilityisoenzymesisozyme analysispolymorphismGUESAGUEMI
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 156 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Bayer, R. J. 1988. Patterns of isozyme variation in western North American Antennaria (Asteraceae: Inulene). 1. Sexual species of section Dioicae . Syst. Bot. 14:389–397.Google Scholar
2. Brown, A.H.D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 15:1–42.Google Scholar
3. Farris, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am. Nat. 106:645–668.Google Scholar
4. Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7:1–46.Google Scholar
5. Haiti, D. L. 1980. Mendelian populations. Pages 72–95 in Haiti, D. L., ed. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publ. Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
6. Haiti, D. L. 1988. Genetic variation. Pages 49–62 in Haiti, D. L., ed. A Primer of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publ., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
7. Hedrick, P. W. 1983. Population genetics and evolutionary biology. Pages 477–522 in Hedrick, P. W., ed. Genetics of Populations. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. Publ. NY.Google Scholar
8. Howard, D. J. and Shields, W. M. 1990. Patterns of genetic variation within and among species of Chauliognathus (Coleoptera: Cantharidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83:326–334.Google Scholar
9. Lane, M. A. 1982. Genetic limits of Xanthocephalum, Gutierrezia, Amphiachyris, Gymnosperma, Greenella, and Thurovia (Compositae: Asteraceae). Syst. Bot. 7:405–416.Google Scholar
10. Lane, M. A. 1985. Taxonomy of Gutierrezia (Compositae: Asteraceae) in North America. Syst. Bot. 10:7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Levene, H. 1949. On a matching problem arising in genetics. Ann. Math. Stat. 20:91–94.Google Scholar
12. McDaniel, K. C., Pieper, R. D., and Donart, G. B. 1982. Grass response following thinning of broom snakeweed. J. Range Manage. 35:219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McDaniel, K. C. and Torell, L. A. 1987. Ecology and management of broom snakeweed. Pages 110–115 in Capinera, J. L., ed. Integrated Pest Management of Rangeland: A Shortgrass Prairie Perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
14. McDaniel, K. C. and Sosebee, R. E. 1988. Ecology management and poisonous properties associated with perennial snakeweeds. Pages 43–56 in James, L. F., Ralphs, M. H., and Nielson, D. B. eds. The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
15. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283–292.Google Scholar
16. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:3321–3323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Nei, M. 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann. Human Genet. 41:225–233.Google Scholar
18. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590.Google Scholar
19. Nei, M., Tajima, F., and Tateno, Y. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Il. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Shields, C. R., Orton, T. J., and Stuber, C. W. 1983. An outline of general resource needs and procedures for the electrophoretic separation of active enzymes from plant tissue. Pages 443–468 in Tanksley, S. D. and Orton, T. J., ed. Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Elsevier Publ., Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Sokal, R. R and Rohlf, F. J. 1962. The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon. 11:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Solbrig, O. T. 1960. Cytotaxonomic and evolutionary studies in the North American species of Gutierrezia (Compositae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 188:1–61.Google Scholar
23. Solbrig, O. T. 1964. Intraspecific variation in the Gutierrezia sarothrae complex (Compositae-Asteraceae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 193:67–115.Google Scholar
24. Swofford, D. L. and Selander, R. B. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72:281–283.Google Scholar
25. Torell, L. A., Gordon, H. W., McDaniel, K. C., and McGinty, A. 1988. Economic impacts of perennial snakeweed infestations. Pages 57–69 in James, L. F., Ralphs, M. H. and Nielsen, D. B., eds. The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
26. Wright, S. 1949. Population structure in evolution. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 93:471–478.Google ScholarPubMed
27. Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Page 125–257 in Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. vol. 4. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar