Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:46:11.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) Response to Control Practices in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paul R. Nester
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Thomas R. Harger
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James P. Geaghan
Affiliation:
Dep. Exp. Stn., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to document the response of itchgrass [Rottboellia exaltata (L.) L.f. ♯3 ROOEX] in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Forrest’] to selected herbicides and postplanting cultivation. Early cultivation stimulated emergence of itchgrass seedlings; however, when plots were cultivated two or three times, itchgrass was effectively removed from the tilled area. Cultivation had no effect on the density, height, standing biomass, or seed production of itchgrass plants in the soybean row but did increase soybean yield. In response to a density reduction of 90%, the average weight, number of tillers and branches, and seed production of single itchgrass plants increased by a factor of 2.9, 3.1, 2.3 and 2.6, respectively, in trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine)-treated plots. Individual plants did not increase growth following density reduction by a postemergence application of diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid}. Itchgrass plants competing for the entire season in plots treated with trifluralin reduced soybean yield approximately 21 g per weed, while itchgrass recovering from diclofop treatment and competing the remainder of the season reduced yield approximately 5 g per weed.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Harger, T. R., Vidrine, P. R., and Nester, P. R. 1982. Control and management of itchgrass. Louisiana Agric. 25(4):2021 and 24.Google Scholar
2. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. 609 pp.Google Scholar
3. Mercado, B. L. 1978. Biology, problems and control of Rottboellia exaltata L.f. A monograph. Biotrop Bull. No. 14.Google Scholar
4. Millhollon, R. W. 1965. Growth characteristics and control of Rottboellia exaltata L.f. a new weed in sugarcane. Sugar Bulletin 44:8288.Google Scholar
5. Millhollon, R. W. 1971. The status of raoulgrass as a weed. Sugar Bulletin 49:291292.Google Scholar
6. Patterson, D. J. and Flint, E. P. 1979. Effects of simulated field temperatures and chilling on itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata). Weed Sci. 27:549553.Google Scholar
7. Rehbein, C. A. 1963. Itchgrass. The Cane Growers Quarterly 26:9495.Google Scholar