Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:54:10.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low temperature reduces glufosinate activity and translocation in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Anuja R. Kumaratilake  and
Christopher Preston
Anuja R. Kumaratilake
Affiliation:
CRC for Australian Weed Management and School of Agriculture and Wine, Waite Campus, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild radish is a major weed in winter grain crops in Australia. This weed is poorly controlled by glufosinate. Therefore, factors influencing glufosinate efficacy in this species were examined. Dose–response studies conducted with three populations of wild radish collected from different parts of Australia and one from Europe showed poor control of all populations by glufosinate under Australian winter conditions. Studies conducted in controlled environmental chambers under night/day temperatures of 5/10, 15/20, and 20/25 C and various light intensities demonstrated that wild radish grown under cooler temperatures of 5/10 C were poorly controlled with 1,200 g ai ha−1 glufosinate when the same rate was sufficient to cause 100% mortality under 15/20 and 20/25 C. Light intensity did not significantly influence glufosinate activity at low temperatures. However, under warm temperatures of 20/25 C, glufosinate efficacy was enhanced with low light intensities. Experiments examining absorption and translocation of glufosinate showed that temperature did not have a significant effect on absorption of glufosinate. However, basipetal translocation of glufosinate was greatly increased by higher temperatures. Therefore, the poor control of wild radish by glufosinate at low temperatures is probably because of reduced accumulation of glufosinate in the meristematic regions of the plant.

Keywords

Glufosinatewild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum L. RAPRAHerbicide absorptionherbicide translocationtemperature
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 10 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, D. M., Swanton, C. J., Hall, J. C., and Mersey, B. G. 1993. The influence of soil moisture, simulated rainfall and time of application on the efficacy of glufosinate ammonia. Weed Res 33:139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beriault, J. N., Horsman, G. P., and Devine, M. D. 1999. Phloem transport of D,L-glufosinate and acetyl-L-glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant and susceptible Brassica napus . Plant Physiol 121:619–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromilow, R. H., Chamberlain, K., Tench, A. J., and Williams, R. H. 1993. Phloem translocation of strong acids—glyphosate, substituted phosphonic and sulfonic acids—in Ricinus communis L. Pestic. Sci 37:39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, K. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Comparative phytotoxicity of glyphosate, SC-0345 and HOE-0061. Weed Sci 32:841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheam, A. H. and Code, G. R. 1998. Wild radish. Pages 207–224 in Panetta, F. D., Groves, R. H., and Shepherd, R.C.H. eds. The Biology of Australian Weeds. Volume 2. Melbourne, Australia: R G & F J Richardson.Google Scholar
Coetzer, E., Al-Khatib, K., and Loughin, T. M. 2001. Glufosinate efficacy, absorption and translocation in amaranth as affected by relative humidity and temperature. Weed Sci 49:8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dröge-Laser, W., Siemeling, U., Puhler, A., and Broer, I. 1994. The metabolites of the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (glufosinate). Plant Physiol 105:159–166.Google ScholarPubMed
Frankton, C. 1955. Weeds of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Queen's Printer. 196 p.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Temperature effects on translocation patterns of several herbicides with quickgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci 36:545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. and Muller, F. 1987. Behavior of glufosinate ammonia in weeds. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 13:1075–1082.Google Scholar
Kleier, D. A. 1988. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics. I. Mathematical model unifying the weak acid and intermediate permeability theories. Plant Physiol 86:803–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocher, H. 2001. The effect of environmental factors on the activity of glufosinate. Pages 513–518 in The BCPC Conference—Weeds. Farnham, U.K.: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Kumaratilake, A. R., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., and Preston, C. 2002. A comparative study of glufosinate efficacy in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) and sterile oats (Avena sterilis). Weed Sci 50:560–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersey, B. G., Hall, J. C., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidal activity of glufosinate-ammonium: absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 37:90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, F. S., Coble, H. D., and Corbin, F. T. 2000. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glufosinate in Xanthium strumarium, Commelina diffusa, and Ipomoea purpurea . Weed Sci 48:171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J. and Hurle, K. 2001. Influence of climatic conditions and plant physiology on glufosinate-ammonium efficacy. Weed Res 41:31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wu, J., and Hatzios, K. K. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate in five weed species as influenced by ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Sci 47:636–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purba, E., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1995. The mechanism of resistance to paraquat is strongly temperature dependent in resistant Hordeum leporinum Link. and H. glaucum Steud. Planta 196:464–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, R. J. L., Stephenson, G. R., and Hall, J. C. 2002. Effect of relative humidity on the uptake, translocation and efficacy of glufosinate ammonium in wild oat (Avena fatua). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 73:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, E., Cremer, J., Donn, G., and Zink, J. 1995. The development of glufosinate ammonia tolerant crops into the market. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3:791–800.Google Scholar
Rasche, E. and Gadsby, M. 1997. Glufosinate ammonia tolerant crops— international commercial development and experiences. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3:941–946.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, B. A., Smeda, R. J., and Johnson, W. G. 2003. Diurnal fluctuations and leaf angle reduce glufosinate efficacy. Weed Technol 17:302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate in four weed species. Weed Sci 45:378–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, H. S., Hsiao, A. I., Quick, W. A., and Hume, J. A. 1996. Influence of water stress on absorption, translocation and phytotoxicity of fenoxaprop-ethyl and imazamethabenz-methyl in Avena fatua . Weed Res 36:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar