Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:01:37.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms that may lead to high genetic divergence and to the invasive success of tall fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis; Asteraceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2021

Maycon Rodrigo Ruiz ,
Claudete Aparecida Mangolin ,
Rubem Silvério de Oliveira Jr ,
Rafael Romero Mendes ,
Hudson Kagueyama Takano ,
Tauana Gibim Eisele  and
Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado Open the ORCID record for Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado [Opens in a new window]
Maycon Rodrigo Ruiz
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Program in Comparative Biology, State University of Maringá, Biological Sciences Center, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Claudete Aparecida Mangolin
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Rubem Silvério de Oliveira Jr
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Rafael Romero Mendes
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Program in Agronomy, State University of Maringá, Center of Agrarian Sciences, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Hudson Kagueyama Takano
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Program in Agronomy, State University of Maringá, Center of Agrarian Sciences, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Tauana Gibim Eisele
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Program in Genetics and Breeding, State University of Maringá, Center of Agrarian Sciences, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado, Department of Biotechnology Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo 5790, Maringá, PR, Brazil. (Email: mfpsmachado@uem.br)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tall fleabane [Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. Walker] is commonly invasive in agricultural fields, reducing yield in various infested crops. The current study investigates the genetic diversity within and between a significant number of invasive C. sumatrensis biotypes in soybean fields in southern, southeastern, and midwestern Brazil, using microsatellites as molecular markers. High and low observed and expected heterozygosity estimated in microsatellite loci supported our hypothesis that different levels of genetic diversity may be detected within biotypes from different invaded fields. Analysis of a significant number of biotypes in several fields showed high and low genetic diversity not associated with geographic distribution, bottleneck effect, or susceptibility to glyphosate. A deficit of heterozygous plants, high genetic divergence, and moderate allelic transference were also observed. Allelic fixation was different in the different biotypes. The bottleneck effect was seen in biotypes with reduced genetic diversity and in biotypes with the highest genetic diversity. Data on genetic diversity, bottleneck effect, and glyphosate resistance showed contrasts in biotypes from nearby invaded fields. Our study showed different genetic diversity levels in biotypes from invaded areas under the same climatic conditions.

Keywords

Broad-leaved fleabaneConyza albidagenetic diversitymicrosatellitesSSR markersSumatran fleabaneweed species
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 64 - 78
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Mithila Jugulam, Kansas State University

References

Abercrombie, LG, Anderson, CM, Baldwin, BG (2009) Permanent genetic resources added to molecular ecology resources database. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1375–1379 Google ScholarPubMed
Allendorf, FW, Luikart, G (2007) Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Malden, UK: Blackwell. 624 p Google Scholar
Anastasiu, P, Memedemin, D (2011) Conyza sumatrensis: a new alien plant in Romania. Botanica Serbica 36:37–40 Google Scholar
Andrews, CA (2010) Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow do not act in isolation in natural populations. Nat Educ Knowl 3:5–8 Google Scholar
Chethan, CR, Singh, PK, Dubey, RP, Subhash, C, Dibakar, G (2019) Herbicide application methodologies: influence of nozzle selection, droplet size and spray drift on effective spraying—a review. Innovative Farming 4:45–53 Google Scholar
Clasen, BM, Moss, NG, Chandler, MA, Smith, AG (2011) A preliminary genetic structure study of the non-native weed, common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). Can J Plant Sci 91:717–723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornuet, JM, Luikart, G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauer, JT, Mortensen, DA, Vangessel, MJ (2007) Temporal and spatial dynamics of long-distance Conyza canadensis seed dispersion. J Appl Ecol 44:105–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dlugosch, KM, Parker, IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, JJ, Doyle, JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15 Google Scholar
Earl, DA, Von Holdt, BM (2012) Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res 4:359–361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erfmeier, A, Hantsch, L, Bruelheide, H (2013) The role of propagule pressure, genetic diversity and microsite availability for Senecio vernalis invasion. PLoS ONE 8:e57029 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S, Goudet, J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Excoffier, L, Foll, M, Petit, RJ (2009) Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:481–501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facon, B, Jarne, P, Pointier, JP, David, P (2005) Hybridization and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic variance. J Evol Biol 18:524–535 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Facon, B, Pointier, J-P, Jarne, P, Sarda, V, David, P (2008) High genetic variance in life-history strategies within invasive populations by way of multiple introductions. Curr Biol 18:363–367 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamrick, JL, Godt, MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 351:1291–1298 Google Scholar
Hao, J-H, Qiang, S, Liu, Q-Q, Cao, F (2009) Reproductive traits associated with invasiveness in Conyza sumatrensis. J Syst Evol 47:245–254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, SR, Gilbert, KJ, Fields, PD (2012) Bayesian inference of a complex invasion history revealed by nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity in the colonizing plant, Silene latifolia. Mol Ecol 20:4721–4734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, SR, Taylor, DR (2010) Genomic admixture increases fitness during a biological invasion. J Evol Biol 23:1720–1731 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M, Crow, JF (1964) The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725–738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavergne, S, Molofsky, J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3883–3888 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazaroto, CA, Fleck, NG, Vidal, RA (2008) Biologia e ecofisiologia de buva (Conyza bonariensis e Conyza canadensis). Cienc Rural 38:852–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucardi, RD, Wallace, LE, Ervin, GN (2020) Patterns of genetic diversity in highly invasive species: cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) expansion in the invaded range of the Southern United States (US). Plants 9:423–436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marochio, CA, Bevilaqua, MRR, Takano, HK, Mangolim, CA, Oliveira, RS Jr, Machado, MFPS (2017) Genetic admixture in species of Conyza (Asteraceae) as revealed by microsatellite markers. Acta Sci 39:437–45Google Scholar
Matesanz, S, Theiss, KE, Holsinger, KE, Sultan, SE (2014) Genetic diversity and population structure in Polygonum cespitosum: insights to an ongoing plant invasion. PLoS ONE 9:e93217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minati, MH, Preston, C, Malone, J (2020) Genetic diversity and spread of glyphosate-resistant flaxleaf fleabane. Bull Nat Res Center 44:2–11 Google Scholar
Mzuku, M, Khosla, R, Reich, R, Inman, D, Smith, F, MacDonald, L (2005) Spatial variability of measured soil properties across soil color-based management zones. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1572–1579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, T, Kimura, M (1973) A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res 22:201–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, M, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Peng, Y, Shrestha, A, Stewart, CN Jr, Jasieniuk, M (2013) Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis in California. Evol Appl 6:761–777 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okada, M, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Peng, Y, Shrestha, A, Stewart, CN Jr, Wright, SD, Jasieniuk, M (2015) Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis in California and a comparison with closely related Conyza canadensis. Weed Res 55:173–184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, RS Jr, Guerra, N, Osipe, JB, Franchini, LHM, Adegas, FS, Osipe, R (2013) Herbicidas registrados para uso e resultados de pesquisa. Pages 65–89 in Constantin, J, Oliveira, RS Jr, Oliveira Neto, AM, eds. Buva: Fundamentos e recomendações para manejo. Curitiba, Brazil : Omnipax Editora Ltda CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peakall, R, Smouse, PE (2012) GENALEX 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrier, X, Jacquemoud-Collet, JP (2019) DARwin Software. Current released version 6.0.021. CIRAD. http://darwin.cirad.fr. Accessed: September 15, 2020Google Scholar
Petit, RJ, Duminil, J, Fineschi, S, Hampe, A, Salvini, D, Vendramin, GG (2005) Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol Ecol 14:689–671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, JK, Wen, W (2003) Documentation for Structure Software. Version 2. http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu Accessed: May 18, 2020Google Scholar
Rasool, N, Reshi, ZA, Khasa, DP, Roshan, M, Shah, MA (2016) Invasion by Conyza sumatrensis alters soil microbial community structure in urban ecosystems. Ecol Proces 5:10–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert, JM, Dariva, TA, Reinert, DJ, Silva, VR (2008) Spatial variability of a planosol and soybean yield on a land-leveled paddy soil: geoestatistical and regression analysis. Ciênc Rural 38:981–988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sansom, M, Saborido, AA, Dubois, M (2013) Control of Conyza spp. with glyphosate—a review of the situation in Europe. Plant Prot Sci 49:44–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, FM, Vargas, L, Christoffoleti, PJ, Agostinetto, D, Martin, TN, Ruchel, Q, Fernando, JA (2014a) Developmental stage and leaf surface reduce the efficiency of chlorimuron-ethyl and glyphosate in Conyza sumatrensis . Planta Daninha 32:361–375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, FM, Vargas, L, Christoffoleti, PJ, Martin, TN, Mariani, F, Silva, DRO (2015) Herbicidas alternativos para o controle de Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. H. Walker resistentes aos inibidores da ALS e EPSPs. Rev Ceres 62:531–538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, G, Oliveira, RS Jr, Constantin, J, Francischini, AC, Osipe, JB (2014b) Multiple resistance of Conyza sumatrensis to chlorimuron-ethyl and to glyphosate. Planta Daninha 32:409–416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, T, Rizzardi, MA, Brammer, SP, Scheffer-Basso, SM, Nunes, AL (2020) Genetic dissimilarity in Conyza sumatrensis revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Planta Daninha 38:e020220570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AL, Hodkinsonc, TR, Villellasd, J, Catforde, JA, Csergö, AM, Blombergh, SP, Cronei, EE, Ehrlénj, J, Garciak, MB, Lainel, A-L, Roachn, DA, Salguero-Gómezo, R, Wardlep, GM, Childsq, DZ, Elderdr, BD, et al. (2020) Global gene flow releases invasive plants from environmental constraints on genetic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:4218–4227 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, J-S, Ma, M (2020) Genetic diversity and genetic differentiation of invasive weed Xanthium italicum in China. Comptes Rendus Biol 343:63–72 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thebaud, C, Abbott, RJ (1995) Characterization of invasive Conyza species (Asteraceae) in Europe: quantitative trait and isozyme analysis. Am J Bot 82:360–368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tola, E, Al-Gaadi, KA, Madugundu, R, Zeyada, AM, Kayad, AG, Biradar, CM (2017) Characterization of spatial variability of soil physicochemical properties and its impact on Rhodes grass productivity. Saudi J Biol Sci 24:421–429 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Travlos, IS, Chachalis, D (2013) Assessment of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis L. Cronq.) and fleabane (Conyza albida Willd. ex Spreng) populations from perennial crops in Greece. Int J Plant Prod 7:665–676 Google Scholar
Vaz Mondo, VH, Gomes Junior, FG, Pinto, TLF, Marchi, JL, Motomiya, AVA, Molin, JP, Cicero, SM (2012) Spatial variability of soil fertility and its relationship with seed physiological potential in a soybean production area. Rev Brasil Sementes 34:193–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, KJF, Macell, M, Wolfe, LM, Biere, A (2011) Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression. Proc R Soc B 278:2–8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voss, N, Eckstein, RL, Durka, W (2012) Range expansion of a selfing polyploid plant despite widespread genetic uniformity. Ann Bot 110:585–593 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, SM, Gaskin, JF, Wilson, LM (2008) Ecological genetics of plant invasion: what do we know? Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:98–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, AP, Cook, ER, Smerdon, JE, Cook, BI, Abatzoglou, JT, Bolles, K, Baek, SH, Badger, AM, Livneh, B (2020) Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368:314–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S (1978) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 590 pGoogle Scholar
Xu, C-Y, Tang, S, Fatemi, M, Gross, C, Julien, M, Curtis, C, Van Klinken, RD (2015) Population structure and genetic diversity of invasive Phyla canescens: implications for the evolutionary potential. Ecosphere 6:ar162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, W-H, Mu, H-P, Cao, H-L, Cao, Ge X-J (2003) Genetic structure of the invasive Chromolaena odorata in China. Weed Res 44:129–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, FC, Yang, R, Boyle, T (1999) Popgene: Microsoft Windows-based Freeware For Population Genetic Analysis. Version 1.32. Calgary, AB, Canada: Centre for International Forestry Research, University of AlbertaGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y-Y, Zhang, D-Y, Barrett, SCH (2010) Genetic uniformity characterizes the invasive spread of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), a clonal aquatic plant. Mol Ecol 19:1774–1786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J, Lou, A (2017) Genetic diversity and population structure of the invasive plant Solanum rostratum in China. Russ J Ecol 48:134–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ruiz et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Ruiz et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.8 KB