Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T19:23:45.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobility of Dicamba, Picloram and 2,4-D in Soil Columns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Grover
R. Grover*
Affiliation:
Herbicide Behaviour in the Environment Section, Res. Stn. Agric. Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The movement of dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), and 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] was studied in five Canadian prairie soils using soil columns. The three acid herbicides showed the following general order of decreasing mobility in the five soils: Asquith sandy loam > Indian Head loam > Regina heavy clay > Weyburn Oxbow loam > Melfort loam, thus indicating an inverse relationship between adsorption and mobility. In general, the distribution coefficients (kd) were comparable to the corresponding Freundlich constants (k) and these were significantly related to the soil organic matter content, to a lesser extent to soil pH, and not correlated with soil clay content. The maximum concentrations of all three herbicides in the column effluents were well below their respective water solubilities and were inversely related to the distribution coefficients. The calculated values for the amounts of precipitation required to leach the three herbicides to a depth of 10 cm showed the following order of mobility: dicamba > picloram > 2,4-D.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 1977 , pp. 159 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Davidson, J.M., Rieck, C.E., and Santelman, P.W. 1969. Influence of water flux and porous material on the movement of selected herbicides. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32:629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davidson, J.M. and Santelman, P.W. 1968. Displacement of fluometuron and diuron through saturated glass beads and soil. Weed Sci. 16:544–548.Google Scholar
3. Day, P.R. 1956. Report of the committee on physical analyses, 1954–55. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 20:167–169.Google Scholar
4. Elrick, D.E. and Maclean, A.H. 1966. Movement, adsorption and degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in soil. Nature 212:102–104.Google Scholar
5. Friesen, H.A. 1965. The movement and persistence of dicamba in soil. Weeds 13:30–33.Google Scholar
6. Green, R.E., Yamane, V.K., and Obien, S.R. 1968. Transport of atrazine in a latosolic soil in relation to adsorption, degradation, and soil water variables. Trans. Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 9th. (Adelaide) 1:195–204.Google Scholar
7. Grover, R. 1971. Adsorption of picloram by soil colloids and various other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 19:417–418.Google Scholar
8. Grover, R. 1973. The adsorptive behavior of acid and ester forms of 2,4-D on soils. Weed Res. 13:51–58.Google Scholar
9. Grover, R. 1973. Movement of picloram in soil columns. Can. J. Soil Sci. 53:307–314.Google Scholar
10. Grover, R. and Smith, A.E. 1974. Adsorption studies with the acid and dimethylamine forms of 2,4-D and dicamba. Can. J. Soil Sci. 54:179–186.Google Scholar
11. Kay, B.D. and Elrick, D.E. 1967. Adsorption and movement of lindane in soils. Soil Sci. 104:314–322.Google Scholar
12. King, P.H. and McCarty, P.L. 1968. A chromatographic model for predicting pesticide migration in soils. Soil Sci. 106:248–261.Google Scholar
13. Lambert, S.M., Porter, P.E., and Schieferstein, R.H. 1965. Movement and sorption of chemicals applied to the soil. Weeds 13:185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lindstrom, F.T., Haque, R., Freed, V.H., and Boersma, L. 1967. Theory on the movement of some herbicides in soils – Linear diffusion and convection of chemicals in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1:561–565.Google Scholar
15. Oddson, J.K., Letey, J., and Weeks, L.V. 1970. Predicted distribution of organic chemicals in solution and adsorbed as a function of position and time for various chemical and soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:412–417.Google Scholar
16. Snelling, K.E., Hobbs, J.A., and Powers, W.L. 1969. Effects of surface area, exchange capacity, and organic matter content on miscible displacement of atrazine in soils. Agron. J. 61:875–878.Google Scholar
17. Swoboda, A.R. and Thomas, G.W. 1968. Movement of parathion in soil columns. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16:923–927.Google Scholar
18. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37:29–38.Google Scholar