Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:26:18.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological and Phenological Variation in Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert F. Norris
Robert F. Norris*
Affiliation:
Weed Sci. Program, Dep. Veg. Crops, Univ. Calif., Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individual barnyardgrass plants were grown in the absence of competition in a common garden environment. Cohorts were initiated in mid-March, late April, early June, mid-July, mid-August, and mid-September. Plants within a cohort varied from prostrate to upright. Early and late cohorts required slightly longer to achieve flowering and seed shatter than those initiated in late spring and early summer. The onset and development of senescence varied by as much as 5 wk between individuals within a cohort, and senescence progressed more rapidly for plants in later cohorts. Longest tiller length per plant averaged 150 cm and did not differ by cohort, but within cohort variation was approximately 33%. The number of tillers per plant declined with increasing delay in cohort initiation; within cohort variation exceeded 40%. Leaf numbers decreased from more than 10,000 per plant to less than 400 per plant with increasing delay in cohort initiation date. Individuals within a cohort had more than two-fold variation in leaf numbers. The number of inflorescences decreased from more than 4500 per plant to less than 100 with increasing delay in cohort initiation. Mean inflorescence length and frequency of different inflorescence lengths per plant varied between plants within a cohort. Vegetative biomass exceeded 3000 g for many plants in the early cohorts, and decreased to less than 25 g per plant for some individuals in the September cohort. More than two-fold variation in biomass occurred between plants within a cohort. Plasticity in morphology and phenology may contribute to the success of barnyardgrass as a weed.

Keywords

Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ♯ ECHCGBiotypesgrowthmorphologyphenologysenescence
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 804 - 814
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, H. G. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. Pages 147–172 in Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L. (eds), The Genetics of Colonizing Species, Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 1–24.Google Scholar
3. Barrett, S. C. H. and Wilson, B. F. 1981. Colonizing ability in the Echinochloa crus-galli complex (barnyardgrass). 1. Variation in life history. Can. J. Bot. 59: 1844–1860.Google Scholar
4. Crafts-Brandner, S., Below, F. E., Harper, J. E., and Hageman, R. H. 1984. Differential senescence of maize hybrids following ear removal. I. Whole plant. Plant Physiol. 74: 360–367.Google Scholar
5. Duncan, R. R., Bockholt, A. J., and Miller, F. R. 1981. Descriptive comparison of senescent and nonsenescent Sorghum genotypes. Agron. J. 73: 849–853.Google Scholar
6. Feltner, K. C., Hurst, H. R., and Anderson, L. E. 1969. Yellow foxtail competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 17: 211–213.Google Scholar
7. Gould, F. W., Alli, M. A., and Fairbrothers, B. E. 1972. A revision of Echinochloa in the United Stales. Am. Midl. Nat. 87: 36–59.Google Scholar
8. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 282 pp.Google Scholar
9. Hamrick, J. L. 1979. Genetic variation and longevity. Pages 84–113 in Solbrig, O. T., Jain, S., Johnson, G. B., and Raven, P. H. (eds), Topics in Plant Population Biology, Colombia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
10. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants, Academic Press, London, 892 pp.Google Scholar
11. Hitchcock, A. S. and Chase, A. 1950. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. Misc. Pub. 200, USDA, US Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1051 pp.Google Scholar
12. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. Pages 32–40 in Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P., The World's Worst Weeds, Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, HA.Google Scholar
13. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1989. Influence of planting date on growth of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Weed Sci. 37: 557–561.Google Scholar
14. Kelly, M. O. and Davies, P. J. 1988. The control of whole plant senescence. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 7: 139–173.Google Scholar
15. Mahmoud, A, Grime, J. P., and Furness, S. B. 1975. Polymorphism in Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Beauv. ex J. & C. Presl. New Phytol. 75: 269–276.Google Scholar
16. Martinková, Z. and Honek, A. 1992. Effect of plant size on the number of caryopses in barnyard grass, Echinochloa crus-galli (Poaceae). Preslia, Praha, 64: 171–176.Google Scholar
17. Maun, M. A. and Barrett, S. C. H. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 77. Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 739–759.Google Scholar
18. Mondal, W. A. and Choudhuri, M. A. 1984. Senescence behaviour of the whole plant in four rice varieties. Experientia 40: 460–461.Google Scholar
19. Nieto, J. H. and Staniforth, D. H. 1961. Corn-foxtail competition under various production conditions. Agron. J. 53: 1–5.Google Scholar
20. Norris, R. F. 1991. Relationship between inflorescence size and seed production in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Weed Sci. 40: 74–78.Google Scholar
21. Norris, R. F. 1992. Predicting seed rain in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Inter. Symp. Biol. Weeds, 9: 377–386.Google Scholar
22. Norris, R. F. and Ayres, D. 1991. Cutting interval and time of irrigation in alfalfa: Yellow foxtail invasion and economic analysis. Agron. J. 83: 552–558.Google Scholar
23. Rahn, E. M., Sweet, R. D., Vengris, J., and Dunn, S. 1968. Life history studies as related to weed control in the Northeast. 5—Barnyardgrass. Northeast Reg. Pub., Bull. 368, Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. of Delaware, Newark, 46 pp.Google Scholar
24. Roché, B. F. and Muzik, T. J. 1964. Ecological and physiological study of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. and the response of its biotypes to sodium 2,2-dichloropionate. Agron. J. 56: 155–160.Google Scholar
25. Rodriguez, R., Sánchez Tamés, R., and Durzan, D. J. (eds). 1990. Plant Aging: Basic and Applied Approaches. NATO ASI Ser., Ser. A: Life Sci. Vol. 186, Plenum Press, New York, 450 pp.Google Scholar
26. Schoner, C.A. Jr., Norris, R. F., and Chilcote, W. 1978. Yellow foxtail (Setaria lutescens) biotype studies: Growth and morphological characteristics. Weed Sci. 26: 632–636.Google Scholar
27. Silvertown, J. W. 1987. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology, Longman Scientific & Technical, and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 229 pp.Google Scholar
28. Thompson, B. K., Weiner, J., and Warwick, S. I. 1991. Size-dependent reproductive output in agricultural weeds. Can. J. Bot. 69: 442–446.Google Scholar
29. Vengris, J., Kacperska-Palacz, A. E., and Livingston, R. B. 1966. Growth and development of barnyardgrass in Massachusetts. Weeds 14: 299–301.Google Scholar
30. Watkinson, A. 1992. Plant senescence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 4l7–420.Google Scholar
31. Webster, R. 1993. Echinochloa. Pages 1252–1253 in Hickman, J. C., (ed), The Jepson Manual Higher Plants of California. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar