Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:58:10.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Off-site movement of surface-applied simazine from a citrus orchard as affected by irrigation incorporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Fuhan Liu  and
Neil V. O'Connell
Neil V. O'Connell
Affiliation:
Cooperative Extension, University of California, Tulare, CA 93274
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the San Joaquin Valley of California the presence of preemergence herbicides in runoff water from citrus orchards during winter rainfall can cause surface water and groundwater contamination. In 1999 and 2000 this study was conducted in a citrus orchard to evaluate the effect of irrigation incorporation with rotor sprinklers on simazine losses in runoff water. Four treatments included the application of simazine at 2.0 kg ai ha−1 without irrigation incorporation and the application of simazine at 2.0 kg ai ha−1 with three levels of irrigation incorporation (0.5, 1.25, and 1.75 cm of water). Simulated rainfall with 3.5 cm of water was then applied on the plots to generate surface runoff. Simazine concentrations in runoff water from the first simulated rainfall event averaged 0.85, 0.77, 0.45, and 0.30 mg L−1 for treatments without irrigation incorporation and for those receiving 0.5, 1.25, and 1.75 cm of water incorporation, respectively; simazine concentration in runoff water from the second event applied 1 wk later averaged 0.42, 0.38, 0.21, and 0.16 mg L−1, respectively. Total simazine mass recovered in runoff water from both simulated rainfall events was estimated to be 6.5, 6.0, 3.6, and 2.5% of the application for treatments without irrigation incorporation and for those receiving 0.5, 1.25, and 1.75 cm of water incorporation, respectively. Applying sufficient water for herbicide incorporation into the soil matrix is a practical approach to mitigate off-site movement from the soil.

Keywords

SimazineRunoff lossescitrus orchard
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 5 , October 2002 , pp. 672 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barker, J. L. and Mickelson, S. K. 1994. Application technology and best management practices for minimizing herbicide runoff. Weed Technol. 8:862–869.Google Scholar
Blake, G. R. and Hartge, K. H. 1986. Bulk density. Pages 363–375 In Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods—Agronomy Monograph No. 9. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: American Agronomy Society-Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Bouwer, H. 1986. Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. Pages 825–843 In Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods—Agronomy Monograph No. 9. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: American Agronomy Society-Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Braun, A. L. and Hawkins, L. S. 1991. Presence of Bromacil, Diuron, and Simazine in Surface Water Runoff From Agricultural Fields and Non-Crop Sites in Tulare County, California. Report PM91-1. Sacramento, CA: Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California Department of Pesticide Regulation.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture. 1995. Analysis of Triazines in Environmental Samples Using a Double Antibody-Coated Micro-titer Plate ELISA Method. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture.Google Scholar
Glotfelty, D. E., Taylor, A. W., Isensee, A. R., Jersey, J., and Glenn, S. 1984. Atrazine and simazine movement to Wye river estuary. J. Environ. Qual. 13:115–121.Google Scholar
Goh, K. S., Hernandez, J., Powell, S. J., Garreston, C., Troiano, J., Randy, M., and Greene, C. D. 1991. Enzyme immunoassay for the determination of atrazine residues in soil. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 46:30–36.Google Scholar
Goh, K. S., Weaver, D. J., Hsu, J., Richman, S. J., Tran, D., and Barry, T. A. 1993. ELISA regulatory application: compliance monitoring of simazine and atrazine in California soils. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 51:330–340.Google Scholar
Goolsby, D. A., Battaglin, W. A., and Thurman, E. M. 1993. Occurrence and Transport of Agricultural Chemicals in the Mississippi River Basin, July through August 1993. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1120-c. 22 p.Google Scholar
Lee, M. 1983. Aldicarb Contamination of Groundwater in Del Norte County. Internal Memo September 21, 1983. PMAP program. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. A. 1990. Movement of pesticides into surface waters. Pages 303–348 In Cheng, H. H., ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts, and Modeling. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 2. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Maes, C. M., Pepple, M., Troiano, J., Weaver, D., Kimaru, W., and SWRCB Staff. 1992. Sampling for Pesticide Residues in California Well Water: 1992 Well Inventory Data Base, Cumulative Report 1986–1992. EH93-02. Sacramento, CA: Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California Department of Pesticide Regulation.Google Scholar
Meek, B. D., Rechel, E. R., Carter, L. M., and DeTar, W. R. 1992. Bulk density of a sandy loam: traffic, tillage, and irrigation-method effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:562–565.Google Scholar
Pickett, C. H., Hawkins, L. S., Pehrson, J. E., and O'Connell, N. V. 1990. Herbicide Use in Citrus Production and Groundwater Contamination in Tulare County. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide Statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 705 p.Google Scholar
Schneider, P. and Hammock, B. D. 1992. Influence of the ELISA format and the hapten-enzyme conjugate on the sensitivity of an immunoassay for s-triazine herbicides using monoclonal antibodies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, S. E. and Leyva, J. J. 1994. Presence of Soil-Applied Herbicides in Three Rights-of-way Infiltration Basins in San Joaquin County. EH 94-01. Sacramento, CA: Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California Department of Pesticide Regulation.Google Scholar
Spurlock, F., Burow, K., and Dubrovsky, N. 2000. Chlorofluorocarbon dating of herbicide-containing well waters in Fresno and Tulare counties, California. J. Environ. Qual. 29:474–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurlock, F., Garretson, C., and Troiano, J. 1997. Runoff from Citrus Orchard Middles: Comparison of Three Herbicides and Effects of Organosilicon Surfactant. EH 97-02. Sacramento, CA: Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California Department of Pesticide Regulation.Google Scholar
Troiano, J. and Garretson, C. 1998. Movement of simazine in runoff water from citrus orchard row middles as affected by mechanical incorporation. J. Environ. Qual. 27:488–494.Google Scholar
Troiano, J., Nordmark, C., Barry, T., and Johnson, B. 1997. Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California: phase II—evaluation and modification of a statistical model. Environ. Monit. Assess. 45:301–318.Google Scholar
Troiano, J., Weaver, D., Marade, J., Spurlock, F., Pepple, M., Nordmark, C., and Bartkowiak, D. 2001. Summary of well water sampling in California to detect pesticide residues resulting from nonpoint-source applications. J. Environ. Qual. 30:448–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed