Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:31:47.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paraquat Phytotoxicity, Absorption, and Translocation in Peanut and Selected Weeds as Influenced by Chloramben

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Box 748, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Univ. Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794-0748
John A. Mcguire
Affiliation:
Res. Data Analysis and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849. Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. J. Ser. No. 3-913136

Abstract

The interaction of chloramben and paraquat on weed control and crop safety in peanuts was examined in a series of experiments. Greenhouse experiments revealed that chloramben was antagonistic toward paraquat on sicklepod and peanut, which are species tolerant to chloramben and sensitive to paraquat Control of Florida beggarweed, a species sensitive to both herbicides, was generally improved with tank mixtures. Similar results were obtained in field studies. Antagonism obtained with tank-mixing chloramben plus paraquat was also obtained by applying chloramben prior to paraquat Studies with 14C-labeled herbicides on Florida beggarweed revealed that chloramben inhibited foliar penetration of paraquat, but paraquat had no effect on foliar penetration of chloramben.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1986. Environmental Protection Agency: Pesticide Products Containing Dinoseb. Federal Register. Vol. 51. No. 198, Part II. Pages 3663436661.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. Pages 206249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. and Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
3. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed Survey—Southern States. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408420.Google Scholar
5. Funderburk, H. B. and Lawrence, J. M. 1964. Mode of action and metabolism of diquat and paraquat. Weeds. 12:259264.Google Scholar
6. O'Donovan, J. T., O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Amine salts of growth regulator herbicides antagonize paraquat. Weed Sci. 30:605608.Google Scholar
7. O'Donovan, J. T., O'Sullivan, P. A., and Caldwell, C. D. 1983. Basis for antagonism of paraquat phytotoxicity to barley by MCPA dimethylamine. Weed Res. 23:165172.Google Scholar
8. O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1982. Influence of several herbicides for broad-leaved weed control and Tween 20 on the phytotoxicity of paraquat Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:445452.Google Scholar
9. Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 959 pp.Google Scholar
10. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1968. Amiben metabolism and selectivity. Weed Sci. 16:283288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wehtje, G. and Reed, R. B. 1985. Control of Florida beggarweed in peanuts with chloramben. Peanut Sci. 12:7377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wehtje, G., Wilcut, J. W., Dylewski, D. P., McGuire, J. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1991. Antagonism of paraquat phytotoxicity in peanuts and selected weed species by naptalam. Weed Sci. 39:634639.Google Scholar
13. Wehtje, G., Wilcut, J. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1991. Influence of bentazon on the phytotoxicity of paraquat to peanuts and associated weeds. Weed Sci. 40:9095.Google Scholar
14. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) . Weed Sci. 37:385391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar