Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:59:33.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photoperiod Effects on the Reproductive Biology of Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. D. Williams
R. D. Williams*
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of 8-, 12-, and 16-h photoperiods on the growth and reproductive biology of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) were investigated over a 3-month period. Plants under the 8-h photoperiod produced the least total, shoot, root, rhizome, and tuber dry weight. Flowering occurred only at the 12-h photoperiod; thus, purple nutsedge is intermediate in flowering response to daylength. Although the total dry weight varied with photoperiod, the relative amount of dry weight (as percent of total weight) partitioned to shoots, roots, rhizomes, and tubers was constant.

Keywords

Partitioningtuber formationfloweringgrowth development
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , November 1978 , pp. 539 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Black, C. C. Jr., Chen, I. M., and Brown, R. N. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Frick, K. E. and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1977. Biocontrol of purple nutsedge by Bactra verutana Zeller in a greenhouse. Weed Sci. 25:13–17.Google Scholar
3. Frick, K. E., Williams, R. D., and Wilson, R. F. 1978. Interactions between Bactra verutana and the development of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) grown under three temperature regimes. Weed Sci. In press.Google Scholar
4. Hammerton, J. L. 1976. Experiments with Cyperus rotundus L. HI. Seasonal variations in growth. Weed Res. 15:339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 346. 32 pp.Google Scholar
6. Holm, L. G., Pucknett, D. L., Pancho, A. V., and Herberger, A. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. 609 pp.Google Scholar
7. Horowitz, M. 1972. Growth, tuber formation, and spread of Cyperus rotundus L. from single tubers. Weed Res. 12:348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Jansen, L. L. 1971. Morphology and photoperiodic responses of yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:210–218.Google Scholar
9. Wills, G. D. 1969. Factors affecting germination and growth of nutsedge. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:336.Google Scholar
10. Wills, G. D. 1975. Effect of light and temperature on growth of purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 23:93–96.Google Scholar
11. Williams, R. D., Quimby, P. C. Jr., and Frick, K. E. 1977. Intraspecific competition of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) under greenhouse conditions. Weed Sci. 25:477–481.Google Scholar