Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:45:37.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant Water Stress of Soybean (Glycine max) and Common Cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum): A Comparison Under field Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. D. Scott  and
R. D. Geddes
H. D. Scott
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
R. D. Geddes
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the seasonal and diurnal water stress of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Lee 74′] grown under intraspecific competition (competition between plants of the same species) and interspecific competition (competition between plants of different species) with common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.). Midday xylem potentials decreased as the season progressed and were lower in common cocklebur during vegetative growth of soybean and in soybean during reproductive growth. For a given species differences in xylem potential due to mode of competition were small. In the diurnal studies xylem potential for each species decreased to a minimum in the early afternoon but recovered to the original pre-dawn values at night. As the season progressed leaf xylem potential (a) decreased at a greater rate, (b) decreased sooner in the day, and (c) recovered at a slower rate. It was shown that differences in xylem potential between soybean and common cocklebur on a given day were small. Greater diffusive resistance values generally were found with soybean than with common cocklebur and with each species grown under interspecific competition.

Keywords

Xylem potential diffusiveresistanceintraspecific competitioninterspecific competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 285 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baughn, J. W. and Tanner, C. B. 1976. Leaf water potential: comparison of pressure chamber and in situ hygrometer on five herbaceous species. Crop Sci. 16:181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boyer, J. S. 1970a. Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates of corn, soybean and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol. 46:233–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Boyer, J. S. 1970b. Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean. Plant Physiol. 46:236–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Brady, R. A., Powers, W. L., Stone, L. R., and Goltz, S. M. 1974. Relation of soybean leaf water potential to soil water potential. Agron. J. 66:795–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ciha, A. J. and Brun, W. A. 1975. Stomatal size and frequency in soybeans. Crop Sci. 15:309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cowan, I. R. 1965. Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. J. Appl. Ecol. 2:221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Doss, B. D., Pearson, R. W., and Rogers, H. T. 1974. Effect of soil water status at various growth stages on soybean yield. Agron. J. 66:297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1978. Growth and water use of cocklebur and soybeans under field conditions. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
10. Ghorashy, S. R., Monroe, R. L., and Pendleton, J. W. 1971. The thirsty soybean. Ill. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. 12:5–6.Google Scholar
11. Kozlowski, T. T., ed. 1968. Water deficits and plant growth. Vol. I. Development, control, and measurement. Academic Press, New York. 390 pp.Google Scholar
12. Kramer, P. J. 1969. Plant and soil water relationships. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 482 pp.Google Scholar
13. Ritchie, J. T. 1974. Atmospheric and soil water influences on the plant water balance. Agric. Meterol. 14:183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Schollander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Bradstreet, E. D., and Hemmingsen, E. A. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Sionit, N. and Kramer, P. J. 1977. Effect of water stress during different stages of growth of soybean. Agron. J. 69:274–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sojka, R. E., Scott, H. D., Ferguson, J. A., and Rutledge, E. M. 1977. Relation of plant water status to soybean growth. Soil Sci. 123:182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar