Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:50:05.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Activity of Sulfentrazone: Effects of Surfactants and Leaf Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Franck E. Dayan ,
Hannah M. Green ,
John D. Weete  and
H. Gary Hancock
Franck E. Dayan
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Hannah M. Green
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Microbiol., Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
John D. Weete
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Microbiol., Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sulfentrazone was foliar applied at 34 and 56 g ai ha−1 alone or in combination with surfactants to soybean cultivars Hutcheson and Centennial and to sicklepod, coffee senna, smallflower morningglory, velvetleaf, and yellow nutsedge. The most sensitive weeds, including coffee senna, smallflower morningglory, and velvetleaf, were severely injured by the lowest rate when sulfentrazone was applied with surfactants. Sulfentrazone provided the highest control of yellow nutsedge with X-77. Soybeans were not severely injured by sulfentrazone applied alone, but 55% foliar injury occurred when the herbicide was applied with X-77. However, the seedlings were not killed. Sicklepod was the most tolerant of the weeds tested. In the absence of surfactants, the order of radiolabeled sulfentrazone absorption by the foliage was Centennial (5.8%) = Hutcheson (8.5%) = coffee senna (10.4%) < yellow nutsedge (17.0%) < velvetleaf (22.3%) = smallflower morningglory (24%). Sicklepod leaves did not retain droplets containing sulfentrazone when no surfactant was used. Species with the highest foliar absorption also showed the greatest phytotoxic response to the herbicide. Addition of surfactants to the spray mixture enhanced the foliar absorption and overall phytotoxicity of sulfentrazone in the weeds. An inverse relationship was detected between the foliar absorption of sulfentrazone without surfactants and the amount of cuticular wax present on the leaves. No such correlation was observed when surfactants were used. Thus, surfactants overcame the barrier to absorption imposed by the cuticular wax and, under these conditions, selectivity apparently became dependent upon species-specific cellular tolerance to sulfentrazone.

Keywords

Sulfentrazone, N-[2,4-dichloro-5-[4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl]phenyl]methane sulfonamideAgri-DexSilwet L-77Sylgaard 309X-77coffee senna, Cassia occidentalis L. ♯ CASOCsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby ♯ CASOBsmallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Grisb., ♯ IAQTAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ♯ ABUTHyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. ♯ CYPESsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Centennial’ and ‘Hutcheson.’Adjuvantsherbicide absorptionsoybeanCASOBCASOCABUTHIAQTACYPES
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 797 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Physiological basis for differential sensitivity to sulfentrazone by sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis). Weed Sci. 44: 12–17.Google Scholar
2. Dayan, F. E. 1996a. Effects of sulfentrazone on protoprophyrinogen oxidase from soybean. Pages 124–135 in Physiological and Biochemical Basis for Tolerance to Sulfentrazone by Soybean and Selected Weed Species. , Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
3. Dayan, F. E. 1996b. Physiological and biochemical responses to sulfentrazone by soybean cultivars. Pages 73–85 in Physiological and Biochemical Basis for Tolerance to Sulfentrazone by Soybean and Selected Weed Species. , Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
4. De Ruiter, H., Uffing, A. J. M., Meinen, E., and Prins, A. 1990. Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Sci. 38: 567–72.Google Scholar
5. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed Survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 393–407.Google Scholar
6. Field, R. J. and Bishop, N. G. 1988. Promotion of stomatal infiltration of glyphosate by an organosilicone surfactant reduces the critical rainfall period. Pestic. Sci. 24: 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Foy, C. L. 1993. Progress and developments in adjuvant use since 1989 in the USA. Pestic. Sci. 38: 65–76.Google Scholar
8. Hancock, H. G. 1992. Weed spectrum of F6285 in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 49.Google Scholar
9. Hancock, H. G. 1994. Post-emergent activity of F6285 in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47: 63.Google Scholar
10. Harr, J., Guggenheim, R., Schulke, G., and Falk, R. H. 1991. Cassia obtusifolia L. The leaf surface of major weeds. Sandoz Agro Ltd. Google Scholar
11. Hayat, M. A. 1989. Plunge-freeze method for conventional and ultrarapid freezing (nitrogen slush). Pages 383–385 in Hayat, M. A. ed.; Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy, Biological Applications. 3rd Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
12. Jacobs, J. M., Jacobs, N. J., and Duke, S. O. 1996. Protoporphyrinogen destruction by plant extracts and correlation with tolerance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibiting herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. In press.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, W. O., Kollman, G. E., Swithenbank, C., and Yih, R. Y. 1978. RH-6201 (Blazer): A new broad spectrum herbicide for postemergence use in soybean. Agric. Food Chem. 26: 285–286.Google Scholar
14. Juniper, B. E. and Jeffree, C. E. 1983. The plant surface in action and plant surfaces in defence and attack. Pages 22–19 in Juniper, B. E. and Jeffree, C. E., eds.; Plant Surfaces. Edward Arnold Limited, London, UK.Google Scholar
15. Jeffree, C. E. 1986. The cuticle, epicuticular waxes and trichomes of plants, with reference to their structure, functions and evolution. Pages 23–64 in Juniper, B. and Southwood, R., eds.; Insects and the Plant Surface. Edward Arnold, Baltimore, MA.Google Scholar
16. Kirkwood, R. C. 1993. Use and mode of action of adjuvants for herbicides: A review of some current work. Pestic. Sci. 38: 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McWorther, C. G. and Ouzts, C. 1994. Leaf surface morphology of Erythroxylum sp. and droplet spread. Weed Sci. 42: 18–26.Google Scholar
18. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Hubbard, T. F. Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 263,222 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max) and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 41: 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Pereira, J. F. 1970. Some plant responses and the mechanism of selectivity of cabbage plants to nitrophen. Weed Sci. 19: 662–666.Google Scholar
20. Roggenbuck, F. C., Penner, D., Burow, R. F., and Thomas, B. 1993. Study of the enhancement of herbicide activity and rainfastness by an organosilicone adjuvant using radiolabeled herbicide and adjuvant. Pestic. Sci. 37: 121–125.Google Scholar
21. Sease, B. L., Murdox, E. C., Stapleton, G. S., and Toler, J. E. 1994. Coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis) control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 47: 66.Google Scholar
22. Singh, M. and Mack, R. E. 1993. Effect of organosilicone-based adjuvants on herbicide efficacy. Pestic. Sci. 38: 219–25.Google Scholar
23. Stevens, P. J. G., Kimberley, M. O., Murphy, D. S., and Policello, G. A. 1993. Adhesion of spray droplets to foliage: The role of dynamic surface tension and advantages of organosilicone surfactants. Pestic. Sci. 38: 237–45.Google Scholar
24. Theodoridis, G., Baum, J. S., Hotzman, F. W., Manfredi, M. C., Maravetz, L. L., Lyga, J. W., Tymonko, J. M., Wilson, K. R., Poss, K. M., and Wyle, M. J. 1992. Synthesis and herbicidal properties of aryltriazolinones. A new class of pre and postemergence herbicides. Pages 135–146 in Baker, D. R., Fenyes, J. G., Steffens, J. J., eds.; Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals III. ACS Symposium Series 504.Google Scholar
25. Vidrine, P. R., Jordan, D. L., and Girlinghouse, J. M. 1994. Efficacy of F6285 in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 47: 62.Google Scholar
26. Wade, B. R., Riechers, D. E., Liebl, R. A., and Wax, Loyd M. 1993. The plasma membrane as a barrier to herbicide penetration and site for adjuvant action. Pestic. Sci. 37: 195–202.Google Scholar
27. Walker, R. H., Richburg, J. S., and Jones, R. E. 1992. F6285 efficacy as affected by rate and method of application., Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45, 51.Google Scholar
28. Walker, R. H. 1994. F6285 applied postemergence in soybean. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 47: 64.Google Scholar
29. Wyrill, J. P. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24: 557–566.Google Scholar
30. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. The effect of competition duration. Pages 83–93 in Weed-Crop Competition. Deutsch, A. E. ed. International Plant Protection Center, Oregon.Google Scholar