Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:40:56.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Grass Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. James Grichar  and
Thurman E. Boswell
W. James Grichar
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Plant Disease Res. Stn., Box 755, Yoakum, TX 77995
Thurman E. Boswell
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Plant Disease Res. Stn., Box 755, Yoakum, TX 77995
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

CGA 82725 {2-propynyl [2-[4-[(3,5-dichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy)] phenoxy] propanoate}, haloxyfop {2-[4-[[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy]phenoxy] propanoic acid}, sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one}, and fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} were applied postemergence to Texas panicum (Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTE), large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA], and broadleaf signalgrass [Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.)Nash. # BRAPP] in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’). Fluazifop applied at 280 and 410 g ai/ha, sethoxydim at 340 g ai/ha, haloxyfop at 140 g ai/ha, and CGA 82725 at 280 g ai/ha usually gave better control when applied to annual grasses in the two- to four-leaf stage than when applied at the six- to eight-leaf stage. Higher rates of application were required to provide acceptable weed control at the later stage of growth. Peanut yields were usually higher following the early applications, indicating that timing of application is important in obtaining improved yields.

Keywords

Annual grassesPanicum texanumDigitaria sanguinalisBrachiaria platyphyllaPANTEDIGSABRAPP
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 587 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174–177.Google Scholar
2. Edwards, N. C. Jr. and Hurst, H. R. 1981. Over-the-top herbicides for annual grass control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:51.Google Scholar
3. Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1981. Postemergence grass control on peanuts. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 13: 111.Google Scholar
4. Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Efficacy of three postemergence grass herbicides in soybeans. Weed Sci. 31:557–561.Google Scholar
5. Rosser, S. W. and Witt, W. W. 1981. Activity of BAS 9052, CGA-82725, and RO-13-8895 on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:99.Google Scholar
6. Schroder, M., Menck, B. H., Pearson, J. O., Inataki, I., and Ishikawa, H. 1979. Control of annual and perennial grasses in soybeans with BAS-9052-OH as a postemergence herbicide. Int. Congr. of Plant Prot. and 71st Annu. Meet. Am. Phytopath. Soc., Washington, DC. Abstr. No. 605.Google Scholar
7. Vesecky, J. F., Hendrick, L. W., Veenstra, M. A., and Ascheman, R. E. 1979. BAS-9052-OH for postemergence control of annual and perennial grasses in field crops. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 34:34.Google Scholar