Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:11:51.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential Effects of Global Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment on the Growth and Competitiveness of C3 and C4 Weed and Crop Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. T. Patterson
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776 and Dep. Bot., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
E. P. Flint
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776 and Dep. Bot., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706

Abstract

Mathematical growth analysis techniques were used to evaluate the effects of CO2 concentrations of 350, 600, and 1000 ppm (v/v) on growth and biomass partitioning in corn (Zea mays L. ‘Dekalb XL 395’), itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata L. f.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Tracy’], and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic). Controlled environment chambers with day/night temperatures of 28/22 C and photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) of 650 μE (microeinsteins) m-2 s-1 were used. Dry matter production in the two C3 species (soybean and velvetleaf) was increased significantly by raising the CO2 concentration above 350 ppm. In corn (a C4 species), dry matter production was least at 1000 ppm CO2 and did not differ between the 350 and 600 ppm treatments. In itchgrass (also C4), dry matter production was greatest at 600 ppm CO2 and did not differ between the 350 and 1000 ppm treatments. Increasing the CO2 concentration increased the rate of dry matter production per unit leaf area (net assimilation rate or NAR) in soybean and velvetleaf but either decreased or did not alter NAR in corn and itchgrass. At 45 days after planting, the weed/crop ratios for total dry matter production for velvetleaf/corn and itchgrass/corn were significantly greater at both 600 and 1000 ppm than at 350 ppm CO2. The weed/crop ratio for itchgrass/soybean was less at 1000 ppm than at 350 or 600 ppm CO2. Compared to the value at 350 ppm, the weed/crop ratio for velvetleaf/soybean was greater at 600 ppm and less at 1000 ppm CO2. We conclude that atmospheric CO2 enrichment probably will make weeds with the C3 photosynthetic pathway more competitive with crops having the C4 pathway. Weeds with the C4 pathway may become less competitive with crops having the C3 pathway.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akita, S. and Moss, D. N. 1972. Differential stomatal response between C3 and C4 species to atmospheric CO2 concentration and light. Crop Sci. 12:789793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Aoki, M. and Yabuki, K. 1977. Studies on the carbon dioxide enrichment for plant growth, VII. Changes in dry matter production and photosynthetic rate of cucumber during carbon dioxide enrichment. Agric. Meteorol. 18:475485.Google Scholar
3. Baes, C. J. Jr., Goeller, H. E., Olson, J. S., and Rotty, R. M. 1976. The global carbon dioxide problem. ORNL-5194. Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 72 pp.Google Scholar
4. Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338344.Google Scholar
5. Hesketh, J. D. 1963. Limitations to photosynthesis responsible for differences among species. Crop Sci. 3:489492.Google Scholar
6. Imai, K. and Murata, Y. 1976. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production of crop plants. I. Effects on leaf area, dry matter, tillering, dry matter distribution ratio, and transpiration. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jap. 45:598606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Imai, K. and Murata, Y. 1977. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production of crop plants. II. Specific and varietal differences in the response of dry matter production. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 46:291297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kramer, P. J., Hellmers, H., and Downs, R. J. 1970. SEPEL: new phytotrons for environmental research. BioScience 20:12011208.Google Scholar
9. Kretchman, D. W. and Howlett, F. S. 1970. Carbon dioxide enrichment for vegetable production. Trans. ASAE 13:252256.Google Scholar
10. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production: Manual of Methods. Dr. W. Junk, N. V. Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Patterson, D. T. 1979. Ecological factors affecting weed competition in soybeans. Proc. World Soybean Res. Conf. II, Raleigh, North Carolina (In press).Google Scholar
12. Patterson, D. T. 1979. Light and temperature adaptation. Chapter 8 in Hesketh, J. D. and Jones, J. W., eds. Predicting Photosynthate Production and Use for Ecosystem Models. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida. (In press).Google Scholar
13. Patterson, D. T., Bunce, J. A., Alberte, R. S., and Van Volkenburgh, E. 1977. Photosynthesis in relation to leaf characteristics of cotton from controlled and field environments. Plant Physiol. 59:384387.Google Scholar
14. Patterson, D. T., Meyer, C. R., Flint, E. P., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1979. Temperature response and potential distribution of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata L. f.) in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:7782.Google Scholar
15. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 481 pp.Google Scholar
16. Wittwer, S. H. and Robb, W. 1964. Carbon dioxide enrichment of greenhouse atmospheres for crop production. Econ. Bot. 18:3456.Google Scholar
17. Woodwell, G. M. 1978. The carbon dioxide question. Sci. Am. 238:3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Woodwell, G. M., Whittaker, R. H., Reiners, W. A., Likens, G. E., Delwiche, C. C., and Botkin, D. B. 1978. The biota and the world carbon budget. Science 199:141146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed