Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:44:48.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting Recovery of Tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus) and Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesii) after Cutting or Burning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John C. Tappeiner II
Affiliation:
School of For., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331. Financial support for this study came from the U.S. Dep. Int. Bureau of Land Manage. and U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. through the southwest Oregon For. Intensive Res. Program Grant No. PNW-80-85
Timothy B. Harrington
Affiliation:
School of For., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331. Financial support for this study came from the U.S. Dep. Int. Bureau of Land Manage. and U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. through the southwest Oregon For. Intensive Res. Program Grant No. PNW-80-85
John D. Walstad
Affiliation:
School of For., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331. Financial support for this study came from the U.S. Dep. Int. Bureau of Land Manage. and U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. through the southwest Oregon For. Intensive Res. Program Grant No. PNW-80-85

Abstract

The development of 157 tanoak [Lithocarpus densiflorus (Hook. and Am.) Rehd.] and 130 Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii Pursh) sprout-clumps 1 to 6 yr after cutting or burning was studied on a range of sites in southwest Oregon. The width and area of sprout-clumps originating from trees ≥ 2-cm stem diameter at 1.4-m height of both species was related to the size of the parent stem and time since cutting (tanoak, r2 = 0.77 and 0.75; Pacific madrone, r2 = 0.84 and 0.83). The sprouting capacity of tanoak develops slowly, and 5 to 6 yr after cutting, sprout-clumps produced by small tanoak 40 to 50 yr old averaged only 37 cm in diameter. Prediction equations, along with stem-diameter distributions of these species in forest stands, can be used to estimate hardwood foliar cover up to 6 yr after cutting.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Johnson, P. S. 1975. Growth and structural development of red oak sprout clumps. For. Sci. 21:413418.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, P. S. 1977. Predicting oak stump sprouting and sprout development in the Missouri Ozarks. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Paper NC-149. 11 pp.Google Scholar
3. Kay, B. L., Leonard, O. A., and Street, J. E. 1961. Control of madrone and tanoak stump sprouting. Weeds 9:369373.Google Scholar
4. McArdle, R. E., Meyer, W. H., and Bruce, D. 1961. Yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 201. 74 pp.Google Scholar
5. Neter, J. and Wasserman, W. 1977. Applied linear statistical models. Richard P. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL. 842 pp.Google Scholar
6. Radosevich, S. R., Passof, P. C., and Leonard, O. A. 1976. Douglas-fir release from tanoak and Pacific madrone competition. Weed Sci. 24:144145.Google Scholar
7. Roy, D. F. 1955. Hardwood sprout measurements in northwestern California, U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Calif. For. Range Exp. Stn. Res. Note 95. 6 pp.Google Scholar