Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:40:09.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence Control of Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Sugarcane (Saccharum spp hybrids) with Pendimethalin and Prodiamine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rex W. Millhollon
Rex W. Millhollon*
Affiliation:
Sugarcane Res. Unit, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Houma, LA 70361
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preemergence control of itchgrass in sugarcane with nonincorporated pendimethalin and prodiamine increased as rate for each herbicide increased from 2.2 to 3.4 kg ai ha-1. Itchgrass control at 3.4 kg ha-1 was similar for both herbicides, ranging from 78 to 94% (86% mean) for pendimethalin in six field experiments and 83 to 91% (86% mean) for prodiamine in three experiments. Incorporated trifluralin at 2.2 kg ha-1, the standard, gave 99% mean control of itchgrass. None of the nonincorporated treatments with pendimethalin or prodiamine consistently prevented a decrease in the sugarcane stalk population at harvest. Asulam applied postemergence at 3.7 kg ae ha-1 controlled itchgrass that survived the preemergence herbicides, and sugarcane stalk populations were maintained. Preemergence control of johnsongrass with nonincorporated treatments of pendimethalin or prodiamine at 2.8 kg ha-1, in a mixture with atrazine at 2.2 kg ai ha-1, ranged from 86 to 95% (89% mean) for pendimethalin and 80 to 95% (88% mean) for prodiamine. Metribuzin at 2.2 kg ha-1, the standard, gave 97% mean control of johnsongrass. Mixtures of pendimethalin with metribuzin or terbacil generally gave more effective control of johnsongrass than mixtures with atrazine. When used in conjunction with other herbicides, nonincorporated pendimethalin and prodiamine were effective alternatives to soil-incorporated treatments for weed control in sugarcane.

Keywords

Sodium salt of asulam, methyl[(4-aminophenyl)sulfonyl] carbamateatrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onependimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamineprodiamine, N3,N3-di-n-propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-(trifluoromethyl)-m-phenylenediamineterbacil, 5-chloro-3-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methyl-2,4-(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedionetrifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamineitchgrass, Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton [=Rottboellia exaltata (Lour.)Clayton] # ROOEXjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAsugarcane, interspecific hybrids of Saccharum.Asulamatrazinemetribuzinterbaciltrifluralindinitroaniline herbicidessugarcane weedsROOEXSORHA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 621 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Harris, C. I. 1967. Movement of herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kennedy, J. M. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. Comparative persistence of dinitroaniline type herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 25:373–381.Google Scholar
4. Millhollon, R. W. 1973. Soil-incorporated trifluralin for controlling weeds in sugarcane. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 2(NS):41–44.Google Scholar
5. Millhollon, R. W. 1976. Asulam for johnsongrass control in sugarcane. Weed Sci. 24:496–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Millhollon, R. W. 1977. Metribuzin for preemergence control of johnsongrass and other weeds in sugarcane. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 16:1299–1306.Google Scholar
7. Millhollon, R. W. 1977. Seasonal germination pattern of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) and control with trifluralin and terbacil. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 16:1027–1037.Google Scholar
8. Millhollon, R. W. 1986. Control of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) in sugarcane with postemergence herbicide treatments. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 19:80–91.Google Scholar
9. Millhollon, R. W. 1986. Preemergence control of seedling johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] and itchgrass [Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton] in sugarcane with several new herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 26:17.Google Scholar
10. Millhollon, R. W. 1992. Effect of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) interference on growth and yield of sugarcane (Saccharaum spp. hybrids). Weed Sci. 40:48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Savage, K. E. and Jordan, T. N. 1980. Persistence of three dinitroaniline herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 28:105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Shahied, S. and Andrews, H. 1966. Leaching of trifluralin, prometryne and cotoran in soil columns. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 19:522–534.Google Scholar
13. Standifer, L. C. and Thomas, H. 1965. Responses of johnsongrass to soil-incorporated trifluralin. Weeds 13:302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Walker, A. and Bond, W. 1977. Persistence of the herbicide AC 92553, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine, in soils. Pestic. Sci. 8:359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Weber, Jerome B. 1990. Behavior of dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. Weed Technol. 4:394–406.Google Scholar
16. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. Herbicide Handbook. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 301 pp.Google Scholar
17. Zimdahl, R. L., Catizone, P., and Butcher, A. C. 1984. Degradation of pendimethalin in soil. Weed Sci. 32:408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar