Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:26:01.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preplanting Applications of Dinitroanilines in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. C. Hamilton  and
H. F. Arle
K. C. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta., Tucson, AZ 85721
H. F. Arle
Affiliation:
Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta., Tucson, AZ 85721
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two incorporation methods were used in applying eight dinitroaniline herbicides before planting cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for 3 yr. Penoxalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] gave the best stands of cotton. Nitralin [4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylaniline] and dinitramine (N4,N4-diethyl-a,a,a-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) resulted in the poorest stands. In 2 of 3 yr, cotton stands were better where herbicides were incorporated by listing only rather than by disking before listing. The eight herbicides were equally effective in annual grass control when followed by postemergence applications of diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea]. An-56477 [N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl)-4-methyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] was least effective in controlling annual broadleaf weeds. In 1972, cotton yield was reduced when An-56477 was incorporated by disking. In the average cotton yields for six tests, An-56477 produced significantly lower yields than any other herbicide except butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine]. No differences in cotton fiber properties or boll components were due to herbicides or method of application.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 51 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arte, H.F. and Hamilton, K.C. 1974. Linuron-trifluralin combinations in irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 22:355–357.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G.A., McLaughlin, R.D., Bannon, J., and Ivy, H. 1973. Performance of dinitroaniline herbicides in peanuts. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:95–106.Google Scholar
3. Davis, G.G. and Jeffery, L.S. 1973. Bioassay of dinitroanilines in Sequatchie loam. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:390–397.Google Scholar
4. Hamilton, K.C. and Arte, H.F. 1971. Herbicide combinations in irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 19:178–182.Google Scholar
5. Hamilton, K.C. and Arte, H.F. 1975. Preplanting applications of diuron with and without trifluralin in cotton. Weed Sci. 23:75–77.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R.G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.Google Scholar
7. Harvey, R.G. 1973. Relative phytotoxicities of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:517–520.Google Scholar
8. Murray, D.S., Santelmann, P.W., and Greer, H.A.L. 1973. Differential phytotoxicity of several dinitroaniline herbicides. Agron. J. 65:34–36.Google Scholar
9. Weber, J.B. and Monaco, T.J. 1972. Review of the chemical and physical properties of the substituted dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:31–37.Google Scholar