Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:34:47.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Purple Deadnettle (Lamium purpureum) Emergence and Removal Time Effects on Soybean Cyst Nematode (Heterodera glycines)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. Kent Harrison*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1086
Ramarao Venkatesh
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1086
Richard M. Riedel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1086
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: harrison.9@osu.edu

Abstract

Purple deadnettle is an obligate winter annual weed and an alternate host of soybean cyst nematode (SCN). Field experiments were conducted using microplots to determine (1) the effect of purple deadnettle planting date and (2) the effect of purple deadnettle removal time on SCN egg population density in continuous no-tillage soybean. A population change factor (PCF) to assess treatment effects on SCN population densities was calculated by dividing the SCN population density at each sampling time (Pf) by the initial population density before treatments were applied (Pi). In the planting date experiment, purple deadnettle seeded on October 3, 11, and 18 resulted in PCF values ranging from 7.28 to 11.41, which were three- to fivefold higher than the PCF values for the weed-free control or purple deadnettle seeded on September 6, 20, and 27. Self-thinning of purple deadnettle seeded in September may have resulted in higher levels of SCN mortality compared to later seeding dates. In the removal time experiment, purple deadnettle removal at 2 and 4 wk after emergence (WAE) resulted in PCF values of 1.19 and 1.54, respectively, which were similar to the PCF for the weed-free control. In contrast, PCF values for purple deadnettle removal times of 6 WAE or later ranged from 2.46 to 5.44. Field and greenhouse experiments provided evidence that completion of the SCN life cycle on purple deadnettle was prevented if the weed was removed before the accumulation of 380 soil degree days within the 5 to 30 C range. Results from the removal study also suggested that completion of the first SCN generation on purple deadnettle in the fall was the primary factor causing increases in egg population density, since PCF values did not continue to increase significantly beyond the 6 WAE removal time.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alston, D. G. and Schmitt, D. P. 1988. Development of Heterodera glycines life stages as influenced by temperature. J. Nematol. 20:366372.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006. 2006 Crop Residue Management Survey. Conservation Tillage Information Center (CTIC). http://www.conservationinformation.org/index.aspsite51action5crm. Accessed: July 23, 2007.Google Scholar
Arendaño, F., Pierce, F. J., Schabenberger, O., and Melakeberhan, H. 2004. The spatial distribution of soybean cyst nematode in relation to soil texture and soil map unit. Agron. J. 96:181194.Google Scholar
Barker, K. R., Koenning, S. R., and Schmitt, D. P. 89100. in 2004. Population density based management. Schmitt, D. P., Wrather, J. A., and Riggs, R. D. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates of Marceline.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1984. Role of temperature in regulating timing of germination in soil seed reserves of Lamium purpureum L. Weed Res. 24:341349.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M., Baskin, C. C., and Parr, J. C. 1986. Field emergence of Lamium amplexicaule L. and L. purpureum L. in relation to the annual seed dormancy cycle. Weed Res. 26:185190.Google Scholar
Bond, J. and Wrather, J. A. 2004. Interactions with other plant pathogens and pests. Pages 107114. in Schmitt, D. P., Wrather, J. A., and Riggs, R. D. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates of Marceline.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. S. 1977. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. New York Springer-Verlag. 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., Wyse, D. L., Johnson, G. A., Porter, P. M., Stetina, S. R., Miller, D. R., Betts, K. J., Klossner, L. D., and Harr, M. J. 2006. Effect of cover crops alfalfa, red clover, and perennial ryegrass on soybean cyst nematode population and soybean and corn yields in Minnesota. Crop Sci. 46:18901897.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E. and Johnson, W. G. 2006. Survey of broadleaf winter weeds in Indiana production fields infested with soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Weed Technol. 20:10661075.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Johnson, W. G., Faghihi, J., Ferris, V. R., and Westphal, A. 2005. First report of soybean cyst nematode reproduction on purple deadnettle under field conditions. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/. Crop Management DOI:10.1094/CM-200500715-01-BR. Accessed February 6, 2007.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Webb, J. S., Young, B. G., Bond, J. P., Harrison, S. K., Ferris, V. R., Faghihi, J., Westphal, A., and Johnson, W. G. 2007. Development of soybean cyst nematode on henbit (Lamium amplexicaule) and purple deadnettle (Lamium purpureum). Weed Technol. 21:10641070.Google Scholar
Hill, N. S. and Schmitt, D. P. 1989. Influence of temperature and soybean phenology on dormancy induction of Heterodera glycines . J. Nematol. 21:361369.Google ScholarPubMed
Koenning, S. R. 2004. Population biology. Pages 7388. in Schmitt, D. P., Wrather, J. A., and Riggs, R. D. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates of Marceline.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2003. Winter annual weed control with fall-applied corn (Zea mays) herbicides. Weed Technol. 17:516520.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R., and Ammerman, C. B. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Animal Sci. 76:12161231.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., and Schabenberger, O. 2006. in. SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd edition. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 160203. 425–428.Google Scholar
Long, J. H. Jr. and Todd, T. C. 2001. Effect of crop rotation and cultivar resistance on seed yield and the soybean cyst nematode in full-season and double-cropped soybean. Crop Sci. 41:11371143.Google Scholar
Miller, D. R., Chen, S. Y., Porter, P. M., Johnson, G. A., Wyse, D. L., Stetina, S. R., Klossner, L. D., and Nelson, G. A. 2006. Rotation crop evaluation for management of the soybean cyst nematode in Minnesota. Agron. J. 98:569578.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A., Johnson, W. G., Wait, J. D., and Smoot, R. L. 2006. Winter-annual weed management in corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) and the impact on soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) egg population densities. Weed Technol. 20:965970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niblack, T. L., Arelli, P. R., Noel, G. R., Opperman, C. H., Orf, J. H., Schmitt, D. P., Channon, J. G., and Tylka, G. L. 2002. A revised classification scheme for genetically diverse populations of Heterodera glycines . J. Nematol. 34:279288.Google ScholarPubMed
Niblack, T. L. and Chen, S. Y. 2004. Cropping systems and crop management practices. Pages 181206. in Schmitt, D. P., Wrather, J. A., and Riggs, R. D. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates of Marceline.Google Scholar
Niblack, T. L., Lambert, K. N., and Tylka, G. L. 2006. A model plant pathogen from the kingdom Animalia: Heterodera glycines, the soybean cyst nematode. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 44:283303.Google Scholar
Noel, G. R. and Edwards, D. I. 1996. Population development of Heterodera glycines and soybean yield in soybean-maize rotations following introduction into a noninfested field. J. Nematol. 28:335342.Google ScholarPubMed
Noel, G. R. and Wax, L. M. 2003. Population dynamics of Heterodera glycines in conventional tillage and no-tillage soybean/corn cropping systems. J. Nematol. 35:104109.Google Scholar
Porter, P. M., Chen, S. Y., Reese, C. D., and Klossner, L. D. 2001. Population response of soybean cyst nematode to long term corn-soybean cropping sequences in Minnesota. Agron. J. 93:619626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, R. D. 1992. Host range. Pages 107114. in Riggs, R. D. and Wrather, J. A. Biology and Management of the Soybean Cyst Nematode. St. Paul, MN American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S. K., and Riedel, R. M. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14:156160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Niblack, T. L., Tremain, J. A., Wiebold, W. J., Tylka, G. L., Marett, C. C., Noel, G. R., Myers, O., and Schmidt, M. E. 2003. Soybean cyst nematode reduces soybean yield without causing obvious aboveground symptoms. Plant Dis. 87:623628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willson, H. R., Riedel, R. M., Eisley, J. B., Young, C. E., Jasinski, J. R., Wheeler, T. A., Kauffman, P. H., Pierson, P. E., and Stuart, M. C. 1996. Distribution of Heterodera glycines in Ohio. J. Nematol. 28:599603.Google ScholarPubMed
Wrather, J. A. and Koenning, S. R. 2006. Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States from 2003 to 2005. J. Nematol. 38:173180.Google Scholar
Wrather, J. A., Koenning, S. R., and Anderson, T. R. 2003. Effect of diseases on soybean yields in the United States and Ontario (1999–2002). http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.com/pub/php/. Plant Health Progress DOI:10.1094/PHP-2003-0325-01 RV. Accessed November 10, 2006.Google Scholar