Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:39:33.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) Control in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) by Fluazifop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jerry A. Ivany*
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, C1A 7M8

Abstract

In greenhouse and field studies, fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy] propanoic acid} controlled quackgrass [Agropyron repens (Beauv.) # AGRRE] in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’). Quackgrass control with fluazifop at 0.25 and 0.5 kg ai/ha in the greenhouse was greatest with application at the two-leaf stage compared with the four-and six-leaf stages. Control was not affected by rhizome length, with similar control obtained of plants grown from 2- and 10-node rhizome pieces. Removal of quackgrass shoots at 6 or 24 h after treatment resulted in decreased control at application rates of 0.25 and 0.5 kg/ha. Fluazifop at 0.5 kg/ha controlled quackgrass treated at the four-leaf stage. The active enantiomer of fluazifop at half the rate of the racemic mixture controlled the quackgrass to the same extent. Fluazifop did not affect potato yield.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chandrasena, J.P.N.R. and Sagar, G. R. 1984. Effects of fluazifop-P-butyl on shoot growth and rhizome buds of Elymus repens L. Gould. Weed Res. 24:297303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chandrasena, J.P.N.R. and Sagar, G. R. 1986. Some factors affecting the performance of fluazifop-P-butyl against Elymus repens L. Gould [=Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.]. Weed Res. 26:139148.Google Scholar
3. Dicks, J. W., Slater, J. W., and Bewick, D. W. 1985. PP. 005 – the R-enantiomer of fluazifop-butyl. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Pages 271280.Google Scholar
4. Gibbard, M., Smith, M. R., and Stoddart, G. B. 1982. Annual and perennial grass weed control with fluazifop-butyl in oilseed rape, potatoes and other broad-leaved crops. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Pages 819825.Google Scholar
5. Hicks, C. P. and Jordan, T. N. 1984. Response of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), and wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) to postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:835841.Google Scholar
6. Ivany, J. A. 1974. Effects of delayed paraquat application on Sebago potato yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:853854.Google Scholar
7. Ivany, J. A. 1976. Kennebec potato yield response to delayed paraquat application. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:539542.Google Scholar
8. Ivany, J. A. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with sethoxydim Weed Sci. 32:194197.Google Scholar
9. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. P., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Plowman, R. E., Stonebridge, W. C., and Hawtree, J. N. 1980. Fluazifop-butyl – a new selective herbicide for the control of annual and perennial grass weeds. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. –Weeds. Pages 2937.Google Scholar