Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:10:18.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) to the Organic Arsenical Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William E. Haigler ,
Billy J. Gossett ,
James R. Harris  and
Joe E. Toler
William E. Haigler
Affiliation:
Exp. Stn. Unit, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC, 29634-0359
Billy J. Gossett
Affiliation:
Exp. Stn. Unit, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC, 29634-0359
James R. Harris
Affiliation:
Exp. Stn. Unit, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC, 29634-0359
Joe E. Toler
Affiliation:
Exp. Stn. Unit, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC, 29634-0359
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The presence of a common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L. # XANST) population resistant to organic arsenical herbicides was confirmed in three adjoining counties of South Carolina's ten-county cotton-growing region, but little evidence of resistance was found in the remaining seven counties. This population was resistant to both disodium salt of methylarsonic acid (DSMA) and monosodium salt of methylarsonic acid (MSMA) but not to herbicides from nine other chemical groups. A much greater level of resistance was apparent in the field than under greenhouse conditions and larger plants were more resistant than small plants.

Keywords

Weed resistanceDSMAMSMAXANST
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 24 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abel, A. L. 1954. The rotation of weed killers. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 1:249–255.Google Scholar
2. Andersen, R. N. 1982. Variation in growth habit and response to chemicals among three common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) selections. Weed Sci. 30:339–343.Google Scholar
3. Bandeen, J. D. and McLaren, R. D. 1976. Resistance of Chenopodium album to triazine herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide resistant weeds in North America. Pages 9–27 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
5. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.Google Scholar
6. Gressel, J., Ammon, H. U., Fogelfors, H., Gasquez, J., Kay, Q. O. N., and Kees, H. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide resistant weeds outside North America. Pages 32–55 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
7. Harper, J. L. 1956. The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 3:179–188.Google Scholar
8. Mudge, L. C., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Resistance of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:591–594.Google Scholar
9. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Snipes, C. E., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30: 553–556.Google Scholar
11. Whitwell, T. and Higgins, J. H. 1985. Report of the 1984 Cotton Weed Loss Committee. Proc. Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Pages 206–210.Google Scholar