Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:51:53.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistance to Aryloxyphenoxypropionate Herbicides in Two Wild Oat Species (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ali M. Mansooji
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Prot., Waite Agric. Res. Inst., Univ. Adelaide, P.O. Bag 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
Joseph A. Holtum
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Prot., Waite Agric. Res. Inst., Univ. Adelaide, P.O. Bag 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
Peter Boutsalis
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Prot., Waite Agric. Res. Inst., Univ. Adelaide, P.O. Bag 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
John M. Matthews
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Prot., Waite Agric. Res. Inst., Univ. Adelaide, P.O. Bag 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
Stephen B. Powles
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Prot., Waite Agric. Res. Inst., Univ. Adelaide, P.O. Bag 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia

Abstract

Resistance to the methyl ester of diclofop, an aryloxyphenoxypropionate graminicide, was shown for a wild oat (Avena fatua) population from Western Australia, and marked resistance to a range of aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione graminicides was detected in a winter wild oat (Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana) population from South Australia. The A. sterilis biotype exhibited high levels of resistance to the aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides diclofop, fluazifop, haloxyfop, fenoxaprop, quizalofop, propaquizafop, and quinfurop and low levels of resistance to the cyclohexanedione herbicides sethoxydim, tralkoxydim, and cycloxydim. Ratios of LD50 values for responses of resistant and susceptible A. sterilis to the aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides were between 20 for propaquizafop and > 1,000 for fluazifop, and were between 2.5 and 3 for the cyclohexanedione herbicides. The LD50 value for diclofop for the A. fatua biotype was 442 g ai ha-1 which was 2.7-fold that of a susceptible control. Thirty-three percent of the plants survived at the registered rate of application.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cartledge, O. 1973. Wild oats Qld. Agric. J. 99:5861.Google Scholar
2. Devine, M. D., MacIsaac, S. A., Romano, M., and Hall, J. C. 1992. Investigation of the mechanism of diclofop resistance in two biotypes of Avena fatua . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42:8896.Google Scholar
3. Häusler, R. E., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1991. Cross-resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) IV. Correlation between membrane effects and resistance to graminicides. Plant Physiol. 97:10351043.Google Scholar
4. Heap, I. M. and Knight, R. J. 1986. The occurrence of herbicide cross-resistance in a population of annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum, resistant to diclofop-methyl. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37:149156.Google Scholar
5. Heap, I. M. and Knight, R. J. 1990. Variation in herbicide cross-resistance in populations of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) resistant to diclofop-methyl. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41:121128.Google Scholar
6. Heap, I. M., Morrison, I. N., and Friesen, L. F. 1991. Cross-resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in Avena fatua (wild oat) populations in western Canada. WSSA Abstr. 31:54.Google Scholar
7. Heap, J. and Knight, R. J. 1982. A population of ryegrass tolerant to the herbicide diclofop-methyl. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 48:156157.Google Scholar
8. Holtum, J.A.M., Matthews, J. M., Häusler, R. E., Liljegren, D. R., and Powles, S. B. 1991. Cross-resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) III. On the mechanism of resistance to diclofop-methyl. Plant Physiol. 97:10261034.Google Scholar
9. Holtum, J.A.M. and Powles, S. B. 1991. Annual ryegrass: an abundance of resistance, a plethora of mechanisms. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds III:10711078.Google Scholar
10. Jacobsohn, R. and Andersen, R. N. 1968. Differential response of wild oat lines to diallate, triallate and barban. Weed Sci. 16:491494.Google Scholar
11. Jana, S. and Naylor, J. M. 1982. Adaptation for herbicide tolerance in populations of Avena fatua . Can. J. Bot. 60:16111617.Google Scholar
12. Jones, P. 1976. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. Agricultural Research Council, London. 296 pp.Google Scholar
13. Joseph, O. O., Hobbs, S.L.A., and Jana, S. 1990. Diclofop resistance in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 38:475479.Google Scholar
14. Matthews, J. M., Holtum, J.A.M., Liljegren, D. E., Furness, B., and Powles, S. B. 1990. Cross-resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) I. Properties of the herbicide target enzymes acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and acetolactate synthase (ALS). Plant Physiol. 94:11801186.Google Scholar
15. Med, R. W. and Pandey, S. 1990. Estimating the cost of wild oats (Avena spp.) in the Australian wheat industry. Plant Prot. Quart. 5:142144.Google Scholar
16. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Mulder, C.E.G. 1982. Morphological and physiological variation in wild oat. Agron. J. 74:771775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Patterson, J. G. 1976. The distribution of Avena species naturalised in Western Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 13:257264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Piper, T. J. 1990. Field trials on diclofop-methyl tolerant wild oats (Avena fatua). Proc. 9th Aust. Weeds Conf. 211215.Google Scholar
19. Powles, S. B. and Howat, P. 1990. Herbicide resistant weeds in Australia. Proc. 9th Aust. Weeds Conf. 9:185193.Google Scholar
20. Powles, S. B. and Matthews, J. M. 1992. Multiple herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum), the driving force for the adoption of integrated weed management in Deholm, I., Devonshire, A., and Holloman, D., eds. Achievements and Developments in Combating Pest Resistance. Elsevier, London, U.K. Google Scholar
21. Price, S. C., Hill, J. E., and Allard, R. W. 1983. Genetic variability for herbicide reaction to plant populations. Weed Sci. 31:652657.Google Scholar
22. Rydrych, D. J. and Seeley, C. I. 1964. Effect of IPC on selections of wild oat. Weeds 12:265267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Shimabukuro, R. H. 1989. Selectivity and mode of action of the post-emergent herbicide diclofop-methyl. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am. Quart. 18:3754.Google Scholar
24. Somody, C. N., Nalewaja, J. D., and Miller, S. D. 1984. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and Avena sterilis morphological characteristics and response to herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:352359.Google Scholar
25. Thai, K. M., Jana, S., and Naylor, J. M. 1985. Variability for response to herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua) populations. Weed Sci. 33:829835.Google Scholar
26. Thurston, J. M. and Phillipson, A. 1976. Distribution. Pages 1966 in Jones, D. P., ed. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
27. Whalley, R.D.B. and Burfitt, J. M. 1972. Ecotypic variation in Avena fatua L., A. sterilis L. (A. ludoviciana), and A. barbata Pott. in New South Wales and southern Queensland. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23:799810.Google Scholar