Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:51:58.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Aryloxyalkanoate Dioxygenase-12 Transformed Soybean Yield Components to Postemergence 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew P. Robinson ,
David M. Simpson  and
William G. Johnson
Andrew P. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 915 W. State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
David M. Simpson
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 915 W. State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New trait technology incorporating 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) resistance in soybean provides an alternative method to control weeds. However, the effect of postemergence treatments of 2,4-D on aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-12 (AAD-12) soybean on injury and yield components has not been reported. Our objectives were to characterize the effect of 2,4-D (dimethylamine salt) rates (0, 1,120, and 2,240 g ae ha−1) and soybean growth stage (V5, R2, or V5 followed by R2) on AAD-12 soybean injury and yield components. Less than 3% soybean injury was observed when 2,240 g ha−1 of 2,4-D was applied to R2 soybean, and less than 1% soybean injury was caused by 1,120 g ha−1 of 2,4-D. Seed yield, seed mass, pod number, seed number, seed per pod, reproductive node number, pods per reproductive node, node number, and percent reproductive nodes were not affected by 2,4-D treatments when applied at the V5, R2, or the V5 followed by R2 soybean growth stage. This research demonstrates that soybean transformed with AAD-12 can tolerate foliar applications of 2,4-D at rates up to 2,240 g ha−1 with no effect on soybean grain yield components.

Keywords

2,4-D (dimethylamine salt)Glycine max (L.) Merr., soybean.2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acidAAD-12 soybeanEnlistsoybean injurytransgenic soybeanyield components
Type
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 242 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, SM, Clay, SA, Wrage, LJ, Matthees, D (2004) Soybean foliage residues of dicamba and 2,4-D and correlation to application rates and yield. Agron J. 96:750–760 Google Scholar
Board, JE, Modali, H (2005) Dry matter accumulation predictors for optimal yield in soybean. Crop Sci. 45:1790–1799 Google Scholar
Dale, P, Irwin, J, Scheffler, J (1993) The experimental and commercial release of transgenic crop plants. Plant Breed 111:1–22 Google Scholar
Delannay, X, Bauman, TT, Beighley, DH, Buettner, MJ, Coble, HD, DeFelice, MS, Derting, CW, Diedrick, TJ, Griffin, JL, Hagood, ES, Hancock, FG, Hart, SE, LaVallee, BJ, Loux, MM, Lueschen, WE, Matson, KW, Moots, CK, Murdock, E, Nickell, AD, Owen, M. D. K., Paschal, EH, Prochaska, LM, Raymond, PJ, Reynolds, DB, Rhodes, WK, Roeth, FW, Sprankle, PL, Tarochione, LJ, Tinius, CN, Walker, RH, Wax, LM, Weigelt, HD, Padgette, SR (1995) Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-resistant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35:1461–1467 Google Scholar
Elmore, RW, Roeth, FW, Klein, RN, Knezevic, SZ, Martin, A, Nelson, LA, Shapiro, CA (2001a) Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate. Agron J. 93:404–407 Google Scholar
Elmore, RW, Roeth, FW, Nelson, LA, Shapiro, CA, Klein, RN, Knezevic, SZ, Martin, A (2001b) Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar yields compared with sister lines. Agron J. 93:408–412 Google Scholar
Jones, MA, Snipes, CE (1999) Tolerance of transgenic cotton to topical applications of glyphosate. J Cotton Sci. 3:19–26 Google Scholar
Kahlon, CS, Board, JE, Kang, MS (2011) An analysis of yield component changes for new vs. old soybean cultivars. Agron J. 103:13–22 Google Scholar
Kelley, KB, Wax, LM, Hager, AG, Riechers, DE (2005) Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 53:101–112 Google Scholar
King, CA, Purcell, LC, Vories, ED (2001) Plant growth and nitrogenase activity of glyphosate-resistant soybean in response to foliar glyphosate applications. Agron J. 93:179–186 Google Scholar
Krausz, RF, Young, BG (2001) Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol 15:745–749 Google Scholar
Miller, DK, Scroggs, DM, Clawson, EL, Lanclos, DY (2008) Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean to glyphosate during reproductive development. Weed Technol 22:359–362 Google Scholar
Nelson, KA, Renner, KA (2001) Soybean growth and development as affected by glyphosate and postemergence herbicide tank mixtures. Agron J. 93:428–434 Google Scholar
Pline, WA, Edmisten, KL, Wilcut, JW, Wells, R, Thomas, J (2003) Glyphosate-induced reductions in pollen viability and seed set in glyphosate-resistant cotton and attempted remediation by gibberellic acid (GA3). Weed Sci. 51:19–27 Google Scholar
Robinson, AP, Conley, SP, Volenec, JJ, Santini, JB (2009) Analysis of high yielding, early-planted soybean in Indiana. Agron J. 101:131–139 Google Scholar
Robinson, AP, Davis, VM, Simpson, DM, Johnson, WG (2013a) Response of soybean yield components to 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 61:68–76 Google Scholar
Robinson, AP, Simpson, DM, Johnson, WG (2013b) Response of glyphosate-tolerant soybean yield components to dicamba exposure. Weed Sci. 61:526–536 Google Scholar
Slife, FW (1956) The effect of 2,4-D and several other herbicides on weeds and soybeans when applied as post-emergence sprays. Weeds 4:61–68 Google Scholar
Thomas, WE, Pline, SAW, Thomas, JF, Edmisten, KL, Wells, R, Wilcut, JW (2004) Glyphosate negatively affects pollen viability but not pollination and seed set in glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Sci. 52:725–734 Google Scholar
Wax, LM, Knuth, LA, Slife, FW (1969) Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:388–393 Google Scholar
Wright, TR, Shan, G, Walsh, TA, Lira, JM, Cui, C, Song, P, Zhuang, M, Arnold, NL, Lin, G, Yau, K, Russell, SM, Cicchillo, RM, Peterson, MA, Simpson, DM, Zhou, N, Ponsamuel, J, Zhang, Z (2010) Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:20240–20245 Google Scholar
Zablotowicz, RM, Reddy, KN (2007) Nitrogenase activity, nitrogen content, and yield responses to glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Crop Prot 26:370–376 Google Scholar
Zobiole, LHS, Kremer, RJ, Oliveria, RS Jr., Constantin, J (2012) Glyphosate effects on photosynthesis, nutrient accumulation, and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant soybean. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 175:319–330 Google Scholar