Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:29:22.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Concord Grapes (Vitis labrusca) to 2,4-D in Irrigation Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard D. Comes ,
Louis Y. Marquis  and
Allen D. Kelley
Richard D. Comes
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Prosser, WA 99350
Louis Y. Marquis
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Prosser, WA 99350
Allen D. Kelley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Prosser, WA 99350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field studies 0.1 ppmw ae or less 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] applied by sprinklers in 5.1 cm of water over 8 h did not affect the number or dry weight of leaves or length of canes of 1-yr-old Concord grape plants (Vitis labrusca L.). A second application at 0.01 ppmw or higher to the same plants 1 yr later reduced growth of leaves, canes, and trunk. Combined effects of root pruning (required to position plants for treatment the second year) and 2,4-D probably account for this apparent anomaly. When 2,4-D was applied annually at 1.0 ppmw or less to established plants for three consecutive years, growth, yield, and fruit quality were not affected. No residues of 2,4-D were detected in the fruit at harvest (detection limit 0.05 ppmw). Grapes treated with 1.0 ppmw 2,4-D developed moderate injury symptoms.

Keywords

Yieldqualitygrowthresidues
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , July 1984 , pp. 455 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1969. Chlorinated organic residues in Pesticide Analytical Manual 1: U.S. Dep. Agric., Section 22 D. Google Scholar
2. Bruns, V. F. 1954. The response of certain crops to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in irrigation water. Part I. Red Mexican beans. Weeds 3:359–376.Google Scholar
3. Bruns, V. F., Carlile, B. L., and Kelley, A. D. 1973. Responses and residues in sugarbeets, soybeans, and corn irrigated with 2,4-D or silvex-treated water. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1476. 31 pp.Google Scholar
4. Bruns, V. F. and Clore, W. J. 1958. The response of certain crops to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in irrigation water. Part III. Concord grapes. Weeds 6:187–193.Google Scholar
5. Bruns, V. F., Demint, R. J., Frank, P. A., Kelley, A. D., and Pringle, J. C. Jr. 1974. Responses and residues in six crops irrigated with water containing 2,4-D. Wash. State Univ. Coll. Agric. Res. Cent. Bull. 798. 9 pp.Google Scholar
6. Clore, W. J. and Bruns, V. F. 1953. The sensitivity of the Concord grape to 2,4-D. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 61:125–134.Google Scholar
7. Clore, W. J. and Tukey, R. B. 1972. Trellising and training grapes for production in Washington. Ext. Bull. 637. Coll. Agric. Wash. State Univ. 12 pp.Google Scholar
8. Comes, R. D. and Kelley, A. D. 1979. Response of certain crops to glyphosate in irrigation water. Weed Sci. 27:658–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Elliston, R. A. and Steward, K. K. 1972. The response of eurasian watermilfoil to various concentrations and exposure periods of 2,4-D. Hyacinth Control J. 10:38–40.Google Scholar
10. Frank, P. A., Demint, R. J., and Comes, R. D. 1970. Herbicides in irrigation water following canalbank treatment for weed control. Weed Sci. 18:687–692.Google Scholar
11. Hodgson, J. M., Bruns, V. F., Timmons, F. L., Lee, W. O., Weldon, L. W., and Yeo, R. R. 1962. Control of certain ditchbank weeds on irrigation systems. U.S. Dep. Agric. Prod. Res. Rpt. No. 60. 64 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kelley, A. D. and Bruns, V. F. 1975. Dissemination of weed seeds by irrigation water. Weed Sci. 23:486–493.Google Scholar
13. Newroth, P. R. 1979. British Columbia aquatic plant management program. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 17:12–19.Google Scholar
14. Sherwood, C. H., Weigle, J. L., and Denisen, E. L. 1970. 2,4-D as an air pollutant: Effects on growth of representative horticultural plants. Hortic. Sci. 5:211–213.Google Scholar
15. Smith, G. E. 1971. Resume of studies and control of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) in the Tennessee valley from 1960 through 1969. Hyacinth Control J. 9:23–25.Google Scholar
16. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill, New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
17. Timmons, F. L. 1960. Weed control in western irrigation and drainage systems. U.S. Agric. Res. Serv. ARS 34–14. 22 pp.Google Scholar
18. Weaver, R. J., Leonard, O. A., and McCune, S. B. 1961. Response of Tokay grapes to spray applications of 2,4-D. Hilgardia 31:419–433.Google Scholar