Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:42:54.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Florunner Peanuts to Planting Dates, Herbicide Sequences, and a Systemic Insecticide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E.W. Hauser
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Tifton, GA 31794
G.A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36830
W.L. Currey
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601
W.J. Ethredge
Affiliation:
Southwest Br. Stn., Plains, GA 31780
D.W. Gorbet
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, Marianna, FL 32446
J.W. Slaughter
Affiliation:
ARS, USDA, Tifton, GA
C.W. Swann
Affiliation:
Univ. Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794

Abstract

Benefin (N-butyl-N-ethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine) applied as a preplant incorporated treatment followed by application at the ground-cracking stage (GC) of a mixture of alachlor [(2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] plus naptalam (N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid) and dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitro-phenol) significantly increased the yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’). Delaying treatment with the GC mixture for 10 days did not significantly depress peanut yields when averaged over all soils, although exceptions occurred within soil series. Substantial and consistent yield reductions occurred when the herbicide sequences terminated with five repeated applications of dinoseb, especially on the Ruston soil. Late planted peanuts often were more susceptible to intensive herbicide treatments than the early plantings. Beginning intensive sequential treatments with vernolate (S-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate) reduced yields more than when benefin initiated the sequence. Average yields of Florunner peanuts were increased significantly by the insecticide disulfoton (O,O-diethyl S[2-(ethylthio)ethyl]phosphorodithioate) on the Greenville and Ruston soil series, but not on the Dothan soil. The disulfotan x herbicide interaction was not significant. Herbicides interacted more frequently with planting date, treatment time, soil series, and year than did disulfoton.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hauser, E.W. 1967. The influence of DMPA on peanut yields. Weeds 15:8485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hauser, E.W. and Buchanan, G.A. 1974. Control of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod in peanuts with dinoseb. Peanut Sci. 1:4044.Google Scholar
3. Hauser, E.W., Buchanan, G.A., Currey, W.L., Ethredge, E.J., Gorbet, D.W., and Swann, C.W. 1976. Response of Florunner peanuts to planting dates, herbicide sequences, and a systemic insecticide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:64.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, E.W., Buchanan, G.A., Ethredge, W.J., Jellum, M.D., and Cecil, S.R., 1976. Interactions among peanut cultivars, herbicide sequences and a systemic insecticide. Peanut Sci. 3:5662.Google Scholar
5. Hauser, E.W. and Parham, S.A. 1964. Herbicide mixtures for weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.), 1961–63. 1964. Weed Res. 4:338350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hauser, E.W., Shaw, W.C., Harrison, H.F., and Parham, S.A. 1962. Herbicides and herbicide mixtures for weed control in peanuts. Weeds 10:139144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar