Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:05:20.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Several Corn (Zea mays) Cultivars and Weed Species to EPTC With and Without the Antidote R-25788

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Erasmo G. Sagaral  and
Chester L. Foy
Erasmo G. Sagaral
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Physiol., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Physiol., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of the herbicide antidote R-25788 (N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide) in protecting corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars from EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) injury. Preplant-incorporated applications of EPTC, with and without R-25788, were made to a fine sandy loam in 1976 and a loamy sand soil in 1977. EPTC at 6.7 kg/ha was 20 to 30% more injurious to the susceptible cultivars grown in sandy, lower organic-matter soil than in fine sandy loam. R-25788 did not decrease the weed-control efficacy of EPTC. The cultivar ‘TXS114’ was highly tolerant to EPTC at 6.7 kg/ha with or without antidote protection. Most of the other EPTC-susceptible cultivars showed significant stand improvement when R-25788 was used in combination with EPTC. R-25788 did not alleviate EPTC phytotoxicity toward ‘XL55’ and ‘XL379’ cultivars. EPTC applied in combination with R-25788 showed no, or only, slight injury to all other cultivars.

Keywords

N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamidephytotoxicityherbicide-antidotethiocarbamates
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 64 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P., Furtick, W. R., and Fang, S. C. 1965. Soil placement studies with EPTC and other carbamate herbicides on Avena sativa . Weed Res. 5:115–122.Google Scholar
2. Beste, C. E. and Schreiber, M. M. 1970. Antagonistic interaction of EPTC and 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 18:484–488.Google Scholar
3. Burt, G. W. 1976. Factors affecting thiocarbamate injury to corn. II: soil incorporation, seed placement, cultivar, leaching, and breakdown. Weed Sci. 24:327–330.Google Scholar
4. Burt, G. W. and Akinsorotan, A. O. 1976. Factors affecting thiocarbamate injury to corn. I: temperature, soil moisture. Weed Sci. 24:318–322.Google Scholar
5. Burt, G. W. and Buzio, C. A. 1979. EPTC plus R-25788 injury to corn (Zea mays) as affected by plant age at treatment. Weed Sci. 27:460–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buzio, C. A. and Burt, G. W. 1980. Leaching of EPTC and R-25788 in soil. Weed Sci. 28:241–245.Google Scholar
7. Chang, F. Y., Bandeen, J. D., and Stephenson, G. R. 1972. A selective antidote for prevention of EPTC injury in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Chang, F. Y., Bandeen, J. D., and Stephenson, G. R. 1973. N,N-diallyl-1,1-dichloroacetamide as an antidote for EPTC and other herbicides in corn. Weed Res. 3:399–406.Google Scholar
9. Chang, F. Y., Stephenson, G. R., and Bandeen, J. D. 1973. Comparative effects of three EPTC antidotes. Weed Sci. 21:292–295.Google Scholar
10. Croak, J. J. 1975. A status report of thiocarbamate injury to corn on the Maryland eastern shore. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:49–54.Google Scholar
11. Dawson, J. H. 1963. Development of barnyardgrass seedlings and their responses to EPTC. Weeds 11:60–66.Google Scholar
12. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1969. Importance of root, shoot, and seed exposure on the herbicidal activity of EPTC. Weed Sci. 17:223–229.Google Scholar
13. Pallos, F. M., Gray, R. A., and Arneklev, D. R. 1978. Antidotes protect corn from thiocarbamate herbicide injury. Pages 15–20 in Pallos, F. M. and Casida, J. E., eds. Chemistry and Action of Herbicide Antidotes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
14. Prendeville, G. N., James, C. S., and Schreiber, M. M. 1969. Antagonistic responses with combinations of carbamate and growth regulator herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:307–308.Google Scholar
15. Sagaral, E. G and Foy, C. L. 1978. Controlling weeds in corn (Zea mays L.) with thiocarbamate herbicides applied with and without antidotes. Va. J. Sci. 29:46.Google Scholar
16. Sagaral, E. G. and Foy, C. L. 1978. Responses of several corn cultivars to EPTC with and without the antidote R-25788 (N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide). Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 23.Google Scholar
17. Thomas, V. M. Jr. and Gray, R. A. 1974. Behavior and persistence of (N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide) R-25788 in soils. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 2.Google Scholar
18. Waldrep, T. W. and Freeman, J. F. 1964. EPTC injury to corn as affected by depth of incorporation in the soil. Weeds 12:313–317.Google Scholar
19. Wright, T. H., Rieck, C. E., and Poneleit, C. G. 1974. Effect of R-25788 on EPTC injury to corn genotypes. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 1.Google Scholar