Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:08:46.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotational Crop Response to Chlorimuron, Clomazone, and Imazaquin Applied the Previous Year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Dale Monks  and
Philip A. Banks
C. Dale Monks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Philip A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments to determine effects of chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the year before planting corn, cotton, and sorghum were conducted at three locations in Georgia. Corn injury was <20% in 1987 and 1988 and yield was not affected. In 1988, imazaquin applied at a high rate or sequentially the previous year to late-planted soybeans injured corn more than applications to the early-planted soybeans. Cotton was the most sensitive crop to herbicides applied the previous year. However, seed cotton yield was not decreased due to herbicides applied the previous year. Sorghum growth and yield 8 weeks after planting was not affected by soybean herbicide application the previous year. Sicklepod, corn, and wheat bioassays did not detect any of the herbicides in soil samples obtained the season after treatment. Bioassays accurately predicted potential injury in corn and sorghum but not cotton.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidclomazone, 2–[(2–chlorophenyl)methyl]–4,4–dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinoneimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1 H-imadazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3320′, ‘Pioneer 3147′, ‘Pioneer 3369A′cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine 90′sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Pioneer 8333′soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Braxton′, ‘Coker 237′, ‘Gordon’ and ‘Ransom′wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Florida 302′sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBBioassaycrop rotationdissipation
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 629 - 633
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1984. The fate of oryzalin applied to straw-mulched and nonmulched soils. Weed Sci. 32:269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Braddock, R. L., Congleton, W. F., and Van Cantfort, A. M. 1987. Rotational crop performance following imazaquin applications in the southeastern U.S. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:379.Google Scholar
3. Braverman, M. P., Lavy, T. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Effects of metolachlor residues on rice. Weed Sci. 33:819–824.Google Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Atrazine carryover in soil in a reduced tillage crop production system. Weed Sci. 28:661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. FMC Corporation. 1990. Command label. Philadelphia, PA 19103.Google Scholar
6. Hurle, K. and Walker, A. 1980. Persistence and its prediction. Pages 84–122 in Hance, R. J., ed. Interactions Between Herbicides and the Soil. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
7. Lavy, T. L. and Santelmann, P. W. 1986. Herbicide bioassay as a research tool. Pages 201–217 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Google Scholar
8. Martin, J. A., Leonard, W. H., and Stamp, D. L. 1976. Pages 168–171 in Principles of Field Crop Production. The Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
9. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1989. Effect of straw ash and tillage on chlorimuron dissipation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:344–347.Google Scholar
10. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1988. Response of rotational crops to soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:47.Google Scholar
11. Poku, J. A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Soil persistence of dinitramine. Weed Sci. 28:650–654.Google Scholar
12. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R., and Frans, R. 1986. Effect of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicide carryover on subsequent crops. Weed Sci. 34:756–760.Google Scholar
14. Ross, M. A. and Lemhi, C. A. 1985. Page 143 in Applied Weed Science. The Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
15. Schroeder, J. and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence of norflurazon in five Georgia soils. Weed Sci. 34:595–599.Google Scholar
16. Walker, A. 1987. Herbicide persistence in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 3:1–17.Google Scholar
17. Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36:629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Zimdahl, R. L., Catizone, P., and Butcher, A. C. 1984. Degradation of pendimethalin in soil. Weed Sci. 32:408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar