Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T06:53:36.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) Control in South Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. Mislevy  and
W. L. Currey
P. Mislevy
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Center, Ona, FL 33865
W. L. Currey
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various chemical and cultural treatments were evaluated for smutgrass [Sporobolus poiretii (R.&S.) Hitchc], control and their effects on pangolagrass (Digitaria decumbens Stent.) and bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flügge). Herbicide treatments were dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) at 1.7, 3.3, and 5.0 kg/ha with Sunoco HE spraying oil at 0, 9.4, 19.0 and 37.0 L/ha. Five weeks after herbicide treatment plots were clipped (clipped vs. nonclipped) and fertilized (0 vs. 112 kg/ha N). Increasing dalapon from 1.7 to 5.0 kg/ha increased smutgrass control and decreased the number of smutgrass plants/plot. Pangolagrass ground cover generally increased with fertilization, as the rate of dalapon increased up to 3.9 kg/ha. Bahiagrass ground cover decreased with rates of dalapon above 1.7 kg/ha. Increasing the rate of oil increased bahiagrass ground cover after 90 days. Nitrogen applied 5 weeks after dalapon treatment and semi-annually for 5 yr generally decreased ground cover of smutgrass and bahiagrass, but increased pangolagrass. Clipping treated smutgrass plants increased pangolagrass and bahiagrass ground cover while decreasing the ground cover of smutgrass.

Keywords

Perennial grasspastureDigitaria decumbensPaspalum notatumdalaponspraying oil
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , May 1980 , pp. 316 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chew, V. 1976. Comparison of treatment means: a compendium. Hortic. Sci. 11:348–357.Google Scholar
2. Currey, W. L., Parrado, R., and Jones, D. W. 1973. Seed characteristics of smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii . Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Florida Proc. 32:53–54.Google Scholar
3. Hitchcock, A. S. 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. USDA Misc. Publ. 200. p. 419.Google Scholar
4. McCaleb, J. E. and Hodges, E. M. 1963. Smutgrass control – a progress report. Down Earth 19:9–10.Google Scholar
5. McCaleb, J. E. and Hodges, E. M. 1971. Smutgrass control at Range Cattle Station, Ona, Florida. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:182–186.Google Scholar
6. McCaleb, J. E., Hodges, E. M., and Kirk, W. G. 1966. Smutgrass control. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Cir. S-149. 10 pp.Google Scholar
7. Petersen, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:205–208.Google Scholar