Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:10:43.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Residue Accumulation from Three Applied Arsenic Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. A. Woolson  and
A. R. Isensee
E. A. Woolson
Affiliation:
Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. Pest. Degrad. Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705
A. R. Isensee
Affiliation:
Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. Pest. Degrad. Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As a result of applying arsenicals as herbicides, desiccants, or soil sterilants, soil As levels can increase under some conditions. Three arsenicals, sodium arsenite, (NaAsO2), cacodylic acid, (hydroxydimethylarsine oxide), and MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate) were applied to bare soil at 1, 2, and 10 times the recommended maximum application rates. After incorporation, radishes (Raphanus sativus L.) and soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were planted as indicator crops to assess the phytotoxicity of accumulated soil As residues. Soil As residues increased at all levels of application. However, only 50% of the As applied at 10 times the recommended rate was found after seven annual applications, regardless of the source. Total losses of As from the soil averaged 14 to 15% of that applied each year. At 10 times the recommended rate, As generally reduced radish and soybean yields, but seldom reduced yields at the two lower rates. Results indicated little danger of As residue accumulating to phytotoxic levels under normal application rates.

Keywords

Metabolismvolatilizationarsenic cyclearsenic movementtoxicity
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 17 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Benson, N. R. 1953. Effect of season, phosphate, and acidity on plant growth in arsenic-toxic soils. Soil Sci. 76:215–224.Google Scholar
2. Benson, N. R. 1976. Retardation of apple tree growth by soil arsenic residues. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101:251–253.Google Scholar
3. Hiltbold, A. E., Hajek, B. F., and Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Distribution of arsenic in soil profiles after repeated applications of MSMA. Weed Sci. 22:272–275.Google Scholar
4. Raab, H. E. 1972. Pre-plant applications of cacodylic acid as it affects yields and residues in corn, soybeans, and wheat. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 32.Google Scholar
5. Raab, H. E. 1972. Pre-plant applications of MSMA as it affects yields and residues in soybeans, corn, and wheat. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 32.Google Scholar
6. Sandberg, G. R., and Allen, I. K. 1975. A proposed arsenic cycle in an agronomic ecosystem. Pages 124–127 in Woolson, E. A., ed. Arsenical Pesticides. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
7. Wells, B. R., and Gilmour, J. T. 1977. Sterility on rice cultivars as influenced by MSMA rate and water management. Agron. J. 69:451–454.Google Scholar
8. Woolson, E. A., Axley, J. H., and Kearney, P. C. 1971. Comparison of a colorimetric and a coulometric method for the determination of arsenic in soil digests. Soil Sci. 111:158–162.Google Scholar
9. Woolson, E. A., Axley, J. H., and Kearney, P. C. 1973. The chemistry and phytotoxicity of As in soils. II. Effects of time and P. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37:254–259.Google Scholar
10. Woolson, E. A. 1973. Arsenic phytotoxicity and uptake in six vegetable crops. Weed Sci. 21:524–527.Google Scholar
11. Woolson, E. A. 1977. Generation of alkylarsines from soil. Weed Sci. 25:412–416.Google Scholar
12. Woolson, E. A. 1977. Fate of arsenicals in different environmental substrates. Environ. Health Perspectives. 19:73–81.Google Scholar