Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:18:11.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Management Can Substitute for Diclofop for Foxtail (Setaria spp.) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mohammad Khan ,
William W. Donald  and
Tony Prato
Mohammad Khan
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Sci. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo 58105
William W. Donald
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Inst., Tarnab (Peshawar) NSFP, Pakistan; Res. Agron., Cropping Systems and Water Quality Res. Unit, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., 244 Agric. Engr., Univ. Missouri, Columbia, 65211, formerly of the ARS Biosciences Res. Lab., Fargo, ND
Tony Prato
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Econ., Univ. Missouri, Mumford Hall, Columbia 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of this research was to determine whether crop management practices could substitute for a herbicide for managing mixed populations of green and yellow foxtail in hard red spring wheat. Crop yield and foxtail growth were measured in two years of field research in North Dakota. Spring wheat yields were as great or greater when early seeding date or 2× seeding rate were substituted for POST diclofop3 at 0.75 kg ai ha−1 for managing foxtail in spring wheat. Yield of spring wheat competing with foxtails was greater for the high seeding rate (2× = 270 kg ha−1) than both the normal (1× = 130 kg ha−1) and low (0.5× = 70 kg ha−1) seeding rates for early or middle seeding dates, but not for the late seeding date. For both early and middle seeding dates, wheat yield at the 2×seeding rate without diclofop was equal to or greater than that of the 1× seeding rate with diclofop. Late-seeded wheat did not yield well in competition with dense foxtail stands for any treatment combination. Early and middle seeding dates favored the relative increase of green foxtail over yellow foxtail in wheat, whereas late seeding favored yellow foxtail over green foxtail. Economic analysis demonstrated that early seeding date was the most critical factor in determining the stochastic dominance of treatments without diclofop over treatments with diclofop. Seeding rate was much less important than seeding date in determining the ranking of treatments in stochastic dominance analysis.

Keywords

Diclofop, (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acidgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. ♯ SETVIyellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. ♯ SETLUspring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Wheaton.’Crop managementeconomicsplantingseeding rateseeding datestochastic dominancesustainable agriculturediclofop
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 362 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alex, J. F. 1967. Competition between Setaria viridis (green foxtail) and wheat seeded at two rates. Res. Rep. West. Section Nat. Weed Comm. (Can.) Pages 286–287.Google Scholar
2. Alex, J. F., Banting, J. D., and Gebhardt, J. P. 1972. Distribution of Setaria viridis in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52: 129–138.Google Scholar
3. Ashford, R., McKercher, R. B., and Holm, F. A. 1990. Chapter 17. Trifluralin. Pages 359–374 in Donald, W. W., ed., Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
4. Banting, J. D., Molberg, A.E.S., and Gebhardt, J. P. 1973. Seasonal emergence and persistence of green foxtail. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53: 369–376.Google Scholar
5. Black, A. L. 1983. Cropping practices: Northern Great Plains. Pages 397–406 in Dregne, H. E. and Willis, W. O., eds., Dryland Agriculture. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
6. Blackman, C. E. and Templeman, W. G. 1938. The nature of thecompetition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J. Agric. Sci. 28: 247–271.Google Scholar
7. Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., Shakeywich, C. F., and Woodbury, W. 1981. Influence of soil temperature and soil moisture on green foxtail (Setaria viridis) established in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29: 179–184.Google Scholar
8. Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., and Sturko, A.R.W. 1981. Effect of seeding dates and densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the growth and productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29: 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dexter, A. G., Nalewaja, J. D., Rasmusson, D. D., and Buchli, J. 1981. Survey of wild oats and other weeds in North Dakota in 1978 and 1979. N. D. Res. Rep. No. 79. 79 pp.Google Scholar
10. Donald, W. W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1990. Chapter 5. Northern Great Plains. Pages 90–126 in Donald, W. W., ed., Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
11. Eberlein, C. V. 1990. Chapter 18. Propanil. Pages 374–390 in Donald, W. W., ed., Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
12. Fay, P. K. 1990. A brief overview of the biology and distribution of weeds of wheat. Pages 33–50 in Donald, W. W., ed., Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
13. Geisler, G. N., Hoag, B. K., Bauer, A., and Kucera, H. L. 1971. Influence of seedbed preparation on some soil properties and wheat yield on stubble. N. D. State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 488. 21 pp.Google Scholar
14. Godel, G. 1938. Cereal growing on weedy land in Northern Saskatchewan. Sci. Agric. 19: 21–23.Google Scholar
15. Hunter, J. H., Morrison, I. N., and Rourke, D. S. R. 1990. The Canadian Prairie Provinces. Pages 51–89 in Donald, W. W., ed., Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
16. Klemme, R. M. 1985. A stochastic dominance comparison of reduced tillage systems in corn and soybean production under risk. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 67: 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kramer, R. A. and Pope, R. D. 1981. Participation in farm commodity programs: a stochastic dominance analysis. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 63: 119–128.Google Scholar
18. Li, C. C. 1975. Path Analysis—a Primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA. 346 pp.Google Scholar
19. Nadeau, L. B. and Morrison, I. N. 1986. Influence of soil moisture on shoot and root growth of green and yellow foxtail (Setaria viridis and S. lutescens). Weed Sci. 34: 225–232.Google Scholar
20. O'Sullivan, P. A. 1990. Diclofop. Pages 321–346 in Donald, W. W., ed., Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
21. Peterson, D. E. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition with spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 6: 291–296.Google Scholar
22. Rahman, A. and Ashford, R. 1972. Control of green foxtail in wheat with trifluralin. Weed Sci. 20: 23–27.Google Scholar
23. Williams, J. 1988. A stochastic dominance analysis of tillage and crop insurance practices in a semiarid region. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 70: 112–120.Google Scholar