Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:42:26.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies to terminate summer cover crops for weed management in no-tillage vegetable production in southeast Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2021

Roberto Botelho Ferraz Branco*
Affiliation:
Researcher, Agronomic Institute, Department of Horticulture (IAC/APTA), Ribeirão Peto, SP, Brazil
Fernando de Carvalho
Affiliation:
Agronomist, Agronomy College, University Moura Lacerda, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
João Paulo Oliveira
Affiliation:
Agronomist, Agronomy College, University Moura Lacerda, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Pedro Luis da Costa Alves
Affiliation:
Professor, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Department of Biology Applied to Agriculture, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Roberto Botelho Ferraz Branco, Instituto Agronômico, Department of Horticulture (IAC/APTA), Rodovia Antonio Duarte Nogueira, km 321, Code:14032-800, Ribeirão Peto, SP, Brazil. (Email: roberto.branco@sp.gov.br)

Abstract

Cover crop residue left on the soil surface as organic mulch in no-tillage crop production provides several environmental benefits, including weed suppression. Thus, many farmers who use cover crops attempt to reduce the use of agricultural inputs, especially herbicides. Therefore, our objectives were to study the potential of different cover crop species to suppress weeds and produce an in situ organic mulch and to evaluate the effect of the organic mulch with and without spraying glyphosate on weed suppression for vegetable (tomato [Solanum lycopersicum L.] and broccoli [Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis]) growth and yield. Five cover crop treatments (sunn hemp [Crotalaria juncea L.], jack bean [Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.], pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor], and no cover crop [control]) were used in the main plots; and glyphosate was or was not sprayed on the flattened cover crop in the subplots of this split-plot experimental design. Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum, and sunn hemp resulted in lower weed biomass during the early seasons of both tomato and broccoli than mulch from jack bean and no cover crop (control). Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 103 g m−2 and 20 g m−2 by 45 and 60 d after transplanting (DATr) of tomato, respectively, and resulted in a better tomato yield compared with not spraying. Glyphosate reduced weed biomass by 110 g m−2 in the early season of broccoli (30 DATr) but did not affect yield. Terminating high-biomass cover crops with a roller-crimper is a promising technique for weed management in vegetable crops that has the potential to reduce or even eliminate the need for herbicide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Carlene Chase, University of Florida

References

Altieri, MA, Lana, MA, Bitterncourt, HV, Kielin, AS, Comim, JJ, Lovato, PE (2011) Enhancing crop productivity via weed suppression in organic no-till cropping systems in Santa Catarina, Brasil. J Sustain Agric 35:855869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RL (2015) Integrating a complex rotation with no-till improves weeds management in organic farming. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:967974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barré, K, Le Viol, L, Julliard, R, Kerbiriou, C (2018) Weed control method drives conservation tillage efficiency on farmland breeding birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 256:7481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazilian Ministry of Health (2016) Agricultural defensive monitoring in water for human consumption. Brazil 2014 Epidemiological Bulletin nº12. P 9Google Scholar
Canali, S, Campanelli, G, Ciaccia, C, Leteo, F, Testane, E, Montemurro, F (2013) Conservation tillage strategy based on the roller crimper technology for weed control in Mediterranean vegetable organic cropping systems. Eur J Agron 50:1118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciaccia, C, Canali, S, Campanelli, G, Testani, E, Montemurro, F, Leteo, F, Delate, K (2015) Effect of roller-crimper technology in weed management in organic zucchini production on Mediterranean climate zone. Renew Agric Food Syst 31:111121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A (2007) Managing Cover Crops Profitably. 3rd ed. Beltsville, MD: Sustainable Agriculture Network. 248 p Google Scholar
Creamer, NG, Bennett, MA, Stinner, BR, Cardina, J, Regnier, EE (1996) Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems. HortScience 31:410413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creamer, NG, Dabney, SM (2002) Killing cover crops mechanically: review of recent literature and assessment of new research results. Am J Alternative Agric 17:3240 Google Scholar
Einhellig, FA, Souza, IF (1992) Phytotoxicity of sorgoleone found in grain sorghum root exudates. J Chem Ecol 18:111 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forcella, F, Eklund, J, Peterson, D (2015) Rolled-crimped winter rye cover effects on hand-weeding times and fruit yield and quality of cucurbits. Int J Veg Sci 21:386396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisa, IM, Mógor, AF, Koehler, HS, Mendes, VS, Da Rolt, SR (2019) No-till broccoli farming over pearl millet: weed suppression and yield at consecutive seasons in the southern coast of Brazil. Idesia 37:2126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäck, O, Ajal, J, Weih, M (2021) Altered nitrogen availability in pea–barley sole- and intercrops changes dominance of two nitrophilic weed species. Agronomy 11:679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornecki, TS, Price, AJ, Raper, RL, Arriaga, FJ (2009) New roller crimper concepts for mechanical termination of cover crops in conservation agriculture. Renew Agric Food Syst 24:165173 10.1017/S1742170509002580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Obour, A, Jha, P, Liu, R, Manuchehri, MR, Dille, JA, Holman, J, Stahlman, PW (2020) Integrating cover crops for weed management in the semiarid U.S. Great Plains: opportunities and challenges. Weed Sci 68:311326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langeroodi, AS, Radicetti, E, Campiglia, E (2018) How cover crop residue management and herbicide rate affect weed management and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) crop. Renew Agric Food Syst 34:492500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, JM, Mitchell, JP, Shrestha, A (2012) Conservation tillage for organic agriculture: Evolution toward hybrid systems in the western USA. Renew Agric Food Syst 27:2130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, RAC, Madeira, NR, Peixoto, JR (2010) Cultivo de brócolos de inflorescência única no verão em plantio direto. Hort Bras 28:2328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, JP, Reicosky, DC, Kueneman, EA, Fisher, J, Beck, D (2019) Conservation agriculture systems. CAB Reviews 1:125 Google Scholar
Miville, D, Leroux, GD (2018) Rolled winter rye-vetch cover crops for weed control in no-till pumpkin. Weed Technol 32:251259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, RD (2001) No-herbicide, no-till summer broccoli—quantity of rye and hairy vetch mulch on weed suppression and crop yield. Pages 85–94 in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, Oklahoma City, OK, July 9–11, 2001Google Scholar
Moyer, J (2011) Organic No-Till Farming. Advancing No-Till Agriculture: Crops, Soil and Equipment. 1st ed. Austin, TX: ACRES. 204 pGoogle Scholar
Navarro-Miró, D, Blanco-Moreno, JM, Ciaccia, C, Chamorro, L, Testani, E, Kristensen, HL, Hefner, M, Tamm, K, Bender, I, Jakop, M, Bavec, M, Védie, H, Canali, S, Sans, FX (2019) Agroecological service crops managed with roller crimper reduce weed density and weed species richness in organic vegetable systems across Europe. Agron Sustain Dev 39:55 10.1007/s13593-019-0597-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osipitan, OA, Dille, JA, Assefa, Y, Radicetti, E, Ayeni, A, Knezevic, SZ (2019) Impact of cover crop management on level of weed suppression: a meta-analysis. Crop Sci 59:833842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palm, C, Blanco-Canqui, H, DeClerck, F, Gatere, L, Grace, P (2014) Conservation agriculture and ecosystems services: an overview. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187:87105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peigné, J, Casagrande, M, Payet, V, David, C, Sans, FX, Blanco-Moreno, JN, Cooper, J, Gaskoyne, K, Antiche, D, Barbèri, P, Bigongiali, F, Surböck, A, Kranzler, A, Beekman, A, Willekens, A, et al. (2015) How organic farmers practice conservation agriculture in Europe. Renew Agric Food Syst 31:7285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritz, C, Kniss, AR, Streibig, JC (2015) Research methods in weed science: statistics. Weed Sci 63:166187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RobaČer, M, Canali, S, Kristensen, HL, Bavec, F, Mlakar, SG, Jakop, M, Bavec, M (2016) Cover crops in organic field vegetable production. Sci Hort 208:104110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, AC, Hirata, ED, Monquero, PA (2009) Produção de palha e supressão de plantas daninhas por plantas de cobertura no plantio direto do tomateiro. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 44:2228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soti, P, Racelis, A (2020) Cover crops for weed suppression in organic vegetable systems in semiarid subtropical Texas. Org Agr 10:429436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Abdul-Baki, AA (1998) Comparison of mixtures vs. monocultures of cover crops for fresh market tomato production with and without herbicide. HortScience 33:11631166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Mohler, CL (2000) The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci 48:385392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, JLR, Pereira, MG, Fabian, AJ (2008) Produção de fitomassa por plantas de cobertura e mineralização de seus resíduos em plantio direto. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 43:421428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, RA (1995) Amount of Crop Residues in No-Till Farming Affects Weed-Crop Ecosystems. Ph.D thesis. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. 162 pGoogle Scholar
Vidal, RA, Trezzi, MM (2004) Potencial de utilização de coberturas vegetais de sorgo e milheto na supressão de plantas daninhas em condição de campo: I – plantas em desenvolvimento vegetativo. Planta Daninha 22:217223 10.1590/S0100-83582004000200007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wutke, EB, Trani, PE, Ambrosano, EJ, Drugowich, MI (2009) Adubação verde no estado de São Paulo. Campinas, SP, Brazil: Boletim Técnico CATI 249Google Scholar