Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:47:16.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survey of glyphosate-, atrazine- and lactofen-resistance mechanisms in Ohio waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2019

Brent P. Murphy
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
Alvaro S. Larran
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina
Bruce Ackley
Affiliation:
Extension Program Specialist, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Mark M. Loux
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Patrick J. Tranel*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Patrick J. Tranel, Email: tranel@illinois.edu

Abstract

Herbicide resistance within key driver weeds, such as common waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer var. rudis (Sauer) Costea and Tardif ], constrains available management options for crop production. Routine surveillance for herbicide resistance provides a mechanism to monitor the development and spread of resistant populations over time. Furthermore, the identification and quantification of resistance mechanisms at the population level can provide information that helps growers develop effective management plans. Populations of Amaranthus spp., including A. tuberculatus, redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), were collected from 51 fields in Ohio during the 2016 growing season. Twenty-four A. tuberculatus populations were screened for resistance to the herbicides lactofen, atrazine, and glyphosate. Phenotypically resistant plants were further investigated to determine the frequency of known resistance mechanisms. Resistance to lactofen was infrequently observed throughout the populations, with 8 of 22 populations exhibiting resistant plants. Within those eight resistant populations, the ΔG210 resistance mechanism was observed in 17 of 30 phenotypically resistant plants, and the remainder lacked all known resistance mechanisms. Resistance to atrazine was observed in 12 of 15 populations; however, a target-site resistance mechanism was not observed in these populations. Resistance to glyphosate was observed in all populations. Gene amplification was the predominant glyphosate-resistance mechanism (147 of 322 plants) in the evaluated populations. The Pro-106-Ser mutation was identified in 24 plants, half of which also possessed gene amplification. In this study, molecular screening generally underestimated the phenotypically observed resistance. Continued mechanism discovery and marker development is required for improved detection of herbicide resistance through molecular assays.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Anderson, DD, Roeth, FW, Martin, AR (1996) Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 10:570575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Harker, KN (2017) Our top 10 herbicide-resistant weed management practices. Pest Manag Sci 73:10451052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, MS, Hager, AG, Tranel, PJ (2013) Multiple resistance to herbicides from four site-of-action groups in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci 61:460468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busi, R, Powles, SB (2009) Evolution of glyphosate resistance in a Lolium rigidum population by glyphosate selection at sublethal doses. Heredity 103:318325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatham, LA, Wu, C, Riggins, CW, Hager, AG, Young, BG, Roskamp, GK, Tranel, PJ (2015) EPSPS gene amplification is present in the majority of glyphosate-resistant Illinois waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations. Weed Sci 29:4855Google Scholar
Délye, C, Duhoux, A, Pernin, F, Riggins, CW, Tranel, PJ (2015) Molecular mechanisms of herbicide resistance. Weed Sci 63:91115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, W, Shi, X, Tjian, R, Lionnet, T, Singer, RH (2015) CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in situ labeling of genomic loci in fixed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:1187011875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, JJ, Doyle, JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:1315Google Scholar
Evans, AF, O’Brien, SR, Ma, R, Hager, AG, Riggins, CW, Lambert, KN, Riechers, DE (2017) Biochemical characterization of metabolism-based atrazine resistance in Amaranthus tuberculatus and identification of an expressed GST associated with resistance. Plant Biotechnol J 15:12381249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foes, MJ, Liu, L, Tranel, PJ, Wax, LM, Stoller, EW (1998) A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci 45:514520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, TA, Zhang, W, Wang, D, Bukun, B, Chisholm, ST, Shaner, DL, Nissen, SJ, Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Webster, TM, Vencill, WK, Sammons, RD, Jiang, J, Preston, C, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2010) Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:10291034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giacomini, DA, Umphres, AM, Nie, H, Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE, Young, BG, Scott, C, Tranel, PJ (2017) Two new PPX2 mutations associated with resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicides in Amaranthus palmeri. Pest Manag Sci 73:15591563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasieniuk, M, Brûlé-Babel, AL, Morrison, IN (1996) The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44:176193Google Scholar
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Stoller, EW, Bollero, GA (2002) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Sci 50:607610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2014) Global perspective of herbicide-resistant weeds. Pest Manag Sci 70:13061315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, I (2018) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: June 1, 2018Google Scholar
Huffman, J, Hausman, NE, Hager, AG, Riechers, DE, Tranel, PJ (2015) Genetics and inheritance of nontarget-site resistances to atrazine and mesotrione in a waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Illinois. Weed Sci 63:799809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, R, Kaundun, SS, Tranel, PJ, Riggins, CW, McGinness, DL, Hager, AG, Hawkes, T, McIndoe, E, Riechers, DE (2013) Distinct detoxification mechanisms confer resistance to mesotrione and atrazine in a population of waterhemp. Plant Physiol 163:363377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, PM, Green, JM (2011) Identification of a tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype resistant to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides, atrazine, and thifensulfuron in Iowa. Weed Technol 25:514518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Ray, JD, Ribeiro, DN, Pan, Z, Reddy, KN (2013) Glyphosate resistance in tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Mississippi is due to both altered target-site and nontarget-site mechanisms. Weed Sci 61:374383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:3162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettmeier, W (1999) Herbicide resistance and supersensitivity in photosystem II. Cell Mol Life Sci 55:12551277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pannell, DJ, Tillie, P, Rodríguez-Cerezo, E, Ervin, D, Frisvold, GB (2016) Herbicide resistance: economic and environmental challenges. AgBioForum 19:136155Google Scholar
Schultz, JL, Chatham, LA, Riggins, CW, Tranel, PJ, Bradley, KW (2015) Distribution of herbicide resistances and molecular mechanisms conferring resistance in Missouri waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer) populations. Weed Sci 63:336345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, LE, Sprague, CL (2004) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn. Weed Sci 52:359364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, PJ, Trucco, F (2009) 21st-century weed science: a call for Amaranthus genomics. Pages 5381 in Stewart, CN Jr, ed. Weedy and Invasive Plant Genomics. Ames, IA: BlackwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service (2016) Soybeans. Yield per harvested acre by county. Washington, DC: National Agriculture Statistics ServiceGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2018) 2017 Agricultural Chemical Use Survey: Soybeans. NASS Highlights No. 2018–4. Washington, DC: National Agriculture Statistics ServiceGoogle Scholar
Vieira, BC, Samuelson, SL, Alves, GS, Gaines, TA, Werle, R, Krugger, GR (2018) Distribution of glyphosate resistant Amaranthus spp. in Nebraska. Pest Manag Sci 74:23162324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, C, Davis, AS, Tranel, PJ (2018). Limited fitness costs of herbicide-resistance traits in Amaranthus tuberculatus facilitates resistance evolution. Pest Manag Sci 74:293301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerffel, RJ, Young, JM, Lee, RM, Tranel, PJ, Lightfoot, DA, Young, BG (2015) Distribution of the ∆G210 protoporphyrinogen oxidase mutation in Illinois waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and an improved molecular method for detection. Weed Sci 63:839845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Murphy et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Tables

Download Murphy et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.5 KB