Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:56:36.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Target Tissue for Napropamide Inhibition: Effects on Green and White Callus Cultures and Seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. Zilkah ,
P. F. Bocion  and
J. Gressel
S. Zilkah
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Genetics, Weizmann Inst. Sci., Rehovot, Israel
P. F. Bocion
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Genetics, Weizmann Inst. Sci., Rehovot, Israel
J. Gressel
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Genetics, Weizmann Inst. Sci., Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We previously reported that napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)-N,N-diethylpropionamide] was highly toxic to achlorophyllous callus of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘San Marzano’), whereas foliar application to seedlings was almost without effect. Experiments were performed to ascertain the effects of napropamide on green and achlorophyllous calli of tomato and broadleaf dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.). The growth of achlorophyllous tissues was more severely inhibited. Foliar applications were not as inhibitory in both species. Napropamide was applied to tomato seedlings via roots and cut shoots and root growth was more inhibited than shoot growth. Thus napropamide is toxic to achlorophyllous tissue and is either less toxic to, or detoxified by green tissue.

Keywords

Lycopersicon esculentumRumex obtusifoliusmicroscreencell culture
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , November 1978 , pp. 711 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Klingman, G. C. and Ashton, F. M. 1975. Weed Science Principles and Practices. Wiley Interscience Publ., New York. p. 158.Google Scholar
2. Zilkah, S. and Gressel, J. 1977. Cell cultures vs. whole plants for measuring phytotoxicity. I. The establishment and growth of callus and suspension cultures; definition of factors affecting toxicity. Plant Cell Physiol. 18:641–655.Google Scholar
3. Zilkah, S., Biocion, P., and Gressel, J. 1977. Cell cultures vs. whole plants for measuring phytotoxicity. II. Correlations between phytotoxicity in seedlings and calli. Plant Cell Physiol. 18:657–670.Google Scholar
4. Zilkah, S. and Gressel, J. 1977. Cell cultures vs. whole plants for measuring phytotoxicity. HI. Correlation between phytotoxicities in cell suspension cultures, calli and seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 18:815–820.Google Scholar
5. Zilkah, S. and Gressel, J. 1978. Correlations in phytotoxicity between white and green calli of three species. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. (in press).Google Scholar