Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-9h5t2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T23:47:52.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Douglas D. Buhler ,
Matt Liebman  and
John J. Obrycki
Matt Liebman
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
John J. Obrycki
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Modern weed control tactics have played a major role in the productivity of cropping systems. Herbicides have been an effective component of weed control for major crops, greatly reducing yield losses and facilitating reduced tillage systems. Although these benefits are important, weed problems, soil erosion, and environmental concerns persist. Herbicides will continue to play a key role in most production systems, but weed species will continue to evolve and weed communities shift in response to selection pressures. Weed science must develop and incorporate additional practices to create integrated management systems that diversify selection pressures and reduce environmental degradation. Integrated pest management (IPM) may provide a useful framework for the development of integrated weed management systems. The basic principles of IPM are well established and have been successfully applied to many agricultural pests. However, the application of IPM to weed management has lagged behind other pest management disciplines. Many of the concepts and approaches of IPM are relevant to weed management, but these were not developed specifically for weed management and are not sufficient to address it adequately. Principles of IPM unique to weed management need to be delineated, developed, and put into practice. Although IPM for other pests provides an excellent framework, weed science must develop its own theory, management tactics, and monitoring procedures based on the unique characteristics of weed communities.

Keywords

Cropping systemsintegrated pest managementintegrated weed managementweed biologyweed ecology

Information

Type
Review
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 274 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Akobunudu, I. O. 1991. Weeds in human affairs in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for sustainable food production. Weed Technol. 5:680–690.Google Scholar
Battles, B., Hartzler, B., and Buhler, D. 1998. Effect of common waterhemp emergence date in soybeans on growth and competitiveness. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:145–146.Google Scholar
Benbrook, C. M. 1996. Pest Management at the Crossroads. Yonkers, NY: Consumers Union. 272 p.Google Scholar
Benbrook, C. M., Hoppin, P., and Liebman, M. 1996. New tools to measure reliance and use of herbicides and the adoption of integrated weed management. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:94–95.Google Scholar
Bottrell, D. R., ed. 1979. Integrated pest management: definition, features, and scope. Pages 19–26 In Council on Environmental Quality. Integrated Pest Management. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. 1994. Impacts of weeds on human endeavors. Weed Technol. 8:392–395.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1996. Development of alternative weed management strategies. J. Prod. Agric. 9:501–505.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., and Forcella, F. 1997a. Implications of weed seed bank dynamics to weed management. Weed Sci. 45:329–336.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., Forcella, F., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1997b. Relative Emergence of Weeds of Corn and Soybean. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension Pub. SA-11. 4 p.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Johnson, G. A., and Sparrow, D. H. 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution. Weed Sci. 45:364–373.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Webster, T. M., Herms, C. P., and Regnier, E. E. 1999. Development of weed IPM: levels of integration for weed management. J. Crop Prod. 2:239–267.Google Scholar
Cate, J. R. and Hinkle, M. K. 1994. Integrated Pest Management: The Path of a Paradigm. Washington, DC: National Audubon Society. 40 p.Google Scholar
Cavers, P. B. 1995. Seed banks: memory in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 75:11–13.Google Scholar
Chiang, H. C. 1978. Insects and their environment. Pages 151–188 In Pfadt, R. E., ed. Fundamentals of Applied Entomology. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. The dynamics of geographic range expansion. Pages 21–54 In Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, D. A., House, G. J., Snider, R. M., Snider, R. J., and Stinner, B. R. 1984. The positive interactions in agroecosystems. Pages 73–81 In Lowrance, R., Stinner, B. R., and House, G. J., eds. Agricultural Ecosystems: Unifying Concepts. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. L. 1996. A reintroduction to integrated weed management. Weed Sci. 44:409–412.Google Scholar
Gould, F. 1991. The evolutionary potential of crop pests. Am. Sci. 79:496–507.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. 1992. Addressing real weed science needs with innovations. Weed Technol. 6:509–525.Google Scholar
Hall, R. 1995. Challenges and prospects of integrated pest management. Pages 1–19 In Reuventi, R., ed. Novel Approaches to Integrated Pest Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. The influence of density on form and reproduction. Pages 195–235 In Population Biology of Plants. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harwood, R. F. 1978. Insect growth. Pages 79–96 In Pfadt, R. E., ed. Fundamentals of Applied Entomology. 3rd ed. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 1999. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Herbicide Resistance Action Committee and Weed Science Society of America. Internet: www.weedscience.com.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1994. Impact of weed control on weeds: new problems and research needs. Weed Technol. 8:400–402.Google Scholar
Krysan, J. L., Jackson, J. J., and Lew, A. C. 1984. Field termination of egg diapause in Diabrotica with new evidence of extended diapause in Diabrotica barberi (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 13:1237–1240.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. Pages 77–92 In Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L., eds. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E. R. 1997. Many little hammers: ecological management of crop-weed interactions. Pages 291–341 In Jackson, L., ed. Ecology in Agriculture. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309–313.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Westra, P., et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195–200.Google Scholar
Maxwell, B. D. 1999. My view. Weed Sci. 47:129.Google Scholar
Maxwell, B. D., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:2–13.Google Scholar
Mortensen, D. A., Johnson, G. A., and Young, L. J. 1993. Weed distribution in agricultural fields. Pages 113–123 In Robert, P. C., Rust, R. H., and Larson, W. E., eds. Soil Specific Crop Management. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Murdock, A. J. and Ellis, R. H. 1992. Longevity, viability, and dormancy. Pages 193–229 In Fenner, M., ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, Oxford, Great Britain: CAB International.Google Scholar
Myers, J. H., Savoie, A., and Van Randen, E. 1998. Eradication and pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43:471–491.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1996. Ecologically Based Pest Management: New Solutions for a New Century. National Academy Board on Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 320 p.Google Scholar
Navas, M. L. 1991. Using plant population biology in weed research: a strategy to improve weed management. Weed Res. 31:171–179.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. 1999. Ecological implications of using thresholds for weed management. J. Crop Prod. 2:31–58.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, J. T. 1996. Weed economic thresholds: useful agronomic tool or pipe dream? Phytoprotection 77:13–28.Google Scholar
Pedigo, L. P. 1995. Closing the gap between IPM theory and practice. J. Agric. Entomol. 12:171–181.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. 1997. Life histories and reproductive strategies. Pages 341–374 In Insect Ecology. 3rd ed, Chapter 14. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Rice, M. E. and Tollefson, J. 1999. Corn rootworms and lodged first-year corn. Integrated Crop Manage. IC-482 22:163–165.Google Scholar
Root, R. B. 1973. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monographs 43:95–124.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1993. Flowering patterns, seed production, and somatic polymorphism of three weed species. Weed Sci. 41:418–425.Google Scholar
Smith, R. F. and van den Bosch, R. 1967. Integrated control. Pages 295–340 In Kilgore, W. W. and Doutt, R. L., eds. Pest Control: Biogical, Physical, and Selected Chemical Methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., van den Bosch, R., and Hagen, K. S. 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29:81–101.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Weaver, S., Cowan, P., Van Acker, R., Deen, W., and Shreshta, A. 1999. Weed thresholds: theory and applicability. J. Crop Prod. 2:9–29.Google Scholar
Swinton, S. M. and King, R. P. 1994. A bioeconomic model for weed management in corn and soybean. Agric. Systems 44:313–335.Google Scholar
Travis, J. L. and Latin, R. X. 1991. Development, implementation, and adoption of expert systems in plant pathology. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 29:343–360.Google Scholar
Wassenaar, L. I. and Hobson, K. A. 1998. Natal origins of migratory monarch butterflies at wintering colonies in Mexico: new isotopic evidence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15436–15439.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., King, R. P., Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., and Swinton, S. M. 1996. GWM: general weed management model. Agric. Systems 50:355–376.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1988. Biology of weed seeds in the soil. Pages 25–39 In Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wyse, D. L. 1992. Future of weed science research. Weed Technol. 6:162–165.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1991. Weed Science—A Plea for Thought. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Service. 34 p.Google Scholar