Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:57:13.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tillage and Soybean Canopy Effects on Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy  and
Marcos J. Oliveira
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Marcos J. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jnorswor@uark.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Pendleton, SC, in 2004 and 2005, to determine the influence of tillage with or without soybean on common cocklebur emergence. Treatments included no-till/no soybean (NTNS), no-till plus soybean (NTS), tillage/no soybean (TNS), and tillage plus soybean (TS). Emergence was monitored from an artificial seed bank in 2004 and a natural seed bank in 2005. Overall, common cocklebur emerged from early May through late October and presented multiple emergence. In no-till plots with or without soybean, initial emergence was delayed 7 d in both years. In TNS plots, major emergence (daily emergence > mean emergence plus standard deviation) of common cocklebur occurred from early May to late July. In NTNS plots, major emergence occurred from late May through late August. No-till reduced total common cocklebur emergence by 59 to 69% compared with tillage. At the V5 to V6 soybean growth stage, the daily soil thermal fluctuation at 2.5 cm soil depth diminished from approximately 15 to 5 C and reduced common cocklebur emergence by 84 to 91% for the rest of the growing season. Common cocklebur emergence was higher when the mean soil temperature was > 15 C, and the daily thermal fluctuation was > 7.5 C. This study suggests that strategies that promote early crop canopy development and minimum tillage should reduce common cocklebur emergence.

Keywords

Common cockleburXanthium strumarium L. XANSTsoybeanGlycine max (L.) MerrEmergence patternstemporal weed emergence
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 474 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bararpour, M. T. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Effect of tillage and interference on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) population, seed production, and seedbank. Weed Sci. 46:424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bàrberi, P. and LoCascio, B. 2001. Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on weed seedbank size and composition. Weed Res. 41:325–340.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1985. The annual dormancy cycle in buried weeds seeds: a continuum. Bioscience. 35:492–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batlla, D., Kruk, B. C., and Benech-Arnold, R. L. 2000. Very early detection of canopy presence by seeds through perception of subtle modifications in red:far-red signals. Funct. Ecol. 14:195–202.Google Scholar
Benech Arnold, R. L., Ghersa, C. M., Sanchez, R. A., and Insausti, P. 1990. Temperature effects on dormancy release and germination rate in Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. seeds: a quantitative analysis. Weed Res. 30:81–89.Google Scholar
Botto, J. F., Scopel, A. L., Ballaré, C. L., and Sánchez, R. A. 1998. The effect of light during and after cultivation with different tillage implements on weed seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 46:351–357.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. S. and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. The effects of depth and fluctuating soil water potential on the emergence of eight annual and six perennial plant species. Weed Sci. 51:725–730.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems. Weed Sci. 40:241–248.Google Scholar
Chancellor, R. J. 1964. The depth of weed seed germination in the field. Pages 607–613. in. Proceedings of the 7th British Weed Control Conference. Brighton, London, UK British Weed Control Council.Google Scholar
Clements, D. R., Benoit, D. L., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci. 44:314–322.Google Scholar
Fortin, M. C. and Pierce, F. J. 1990. Development and growth effects of crop residues on corn. Agron. J. 82:710–715.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Martinez-Ghersa, M. A., Casal, J. J., Kaufman, M., Roush, M. L., and Deregibus, V. A. 1994. Effect of light on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) competition. Weed Technol. 8:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosheh, H. Z. and Al-Hajaj, N. A. 2004. Impact of soil tillage and crop rotation on barley (Hordeum vulgare) and weeds in a semi-arid environment. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190:374–380.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Pages 7–83. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Battles, B. A., and Nordby, D. 2004. Effect of common soil waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybean. Weed Sci. 52:242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 2007. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/in.asp.Google Scholar
Henry, W. T. and Bauman, T. T. 1989. Interference between soybeans (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) under Indiana field conditions. Weed Sci. 37:753–760.Google Scholar
[ISTA] International Seed Testing Association 1985. International rules for seed testing 1985. Seed Sci. Technol. 13:327–483.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Dilbeck, J. S., DeFelice, M. S., and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Weed control with reduced rates of imazaquin and imazethapyr in no-till narrow-row soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 46:105–110.Google Scholar
Kaul, V. 1965. Physiological ecology of Xanthium strumarium Linn. II. Physiology of seed in relation to its distribution. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 44:365–380.Google Scholar
King, T. J. 1975. Inhibition of seed germination under leaf canopies in Arenaria serpyllifolia, Veronica arvensis and Cerastum holosteoides . New Phytol. 75:87–90.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Miura, S., and Oyanagi, A. 2003. Analysis of weed vegetation of no-tillage upland fields based on multiplied dominance ratio. Weed Biol. Manag. 3:77–92.Google Scholar
Litch, M. A. and Al-Kaisi, M. 2005. Strip-tillage on seedbed soil temperature and other soil physical properties. Soil Tillage Res. 80:233–249.Google Scholar
Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Effect of tillage systems on the efficacy and phytotoxicity of imazaquin and imazethapyr in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:233–238.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 1993. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecol. Appl. 3:53–73.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. C., Runger, G. C., and Hubele, N. F. 2001. Engineering Statistic. 2nd ed. New York J. Wiley. 448–480.Google Scholar
Muyonga, K. C., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1996. Weed control with reduced rates of four soil applied soybean herbicides. Weed Sci. 44:148–155.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol. 17:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. 2004a. South Carolina Soybean Production Guide: Planting Considerations. http://www.clemson.edu/edisto/soybean/planting%20considerations.pdf Accessed on: April 19, 2006.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2004b. Soybean canopy formation effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) emergence. Weed Sci. 52:961–967.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Jha, P., and Bridges, W. Jr. 2007. Sicklepod survival and fecundity in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 55:252–259.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliveira, M. J. 2007. Light and temperature requirements for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) germination during after-ripening under field conditions. Weed Sci. 55:227–234.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A. Jr. and Kendig, J. A. 1999. Inheritance of an ALS-cross-resistant common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) biotype. Weed Technol. 13:100–103.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2001. Weed management in transgenic soybean resistant to glyphosate under conventional tillage and no-tillage systems. J. New Seeds. 3:27–40.Google Scholar
Schmidt, L. A., Talbert, R. E., and McClelland, M. 2004. Management of acetolactate synthase (ALS)-resistant common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) in soybean. Weed Technol. 18:665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballaré, C. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1994. Photostimulation of seed germination during soil tillage. New Phytol. 126:145–152.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballaré, C. L., and Sánchez, R. A. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weeds seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivations. Plant Cell Env. 14:501–508.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 52:591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streit, B., Rieger, S. B., Stamp, P., and Richner, W. 2003. Weed populations in winter wheat as affected by crop sequence, intensity of tillage and time of herbicide application in a cool and humid climate. Weed Res. 43:20–32.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1983. A comparative study of germination to diurnally-fluctuating temperatures. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:141–156.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11:308–317.Google Scholar
Wiesbrook, M. L., Johnson, W. G., Hart, S. E., Bradley, P. R., and Wax, L. M. 2001. Comparison of weed management systems in narrow-row, glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effects of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seed in soil. Weed Sci. 40:429–433.Google Scholar